Home: Non Football Related: General Chat:
Brexit - Again



leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 3, 2019, 7:54 PM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 4714
     Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Steve has asked that we restart with a new thread as it reduces the use of system resources, (most posters come in on the first new post when browsing).

Just a reminder to those of you posting on here, that the point is to discuss what is happening and what may happen. Just because someone disagrees with you does not make them a bad person, so argue the point as much as you like but always play the ball, not the man (or woman).


With the goings on in Parliament today, I think it was necessary to end the prorogation of discussion here.



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 3, 2019, 8:52 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 4693
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Steve has asked that we restart with a new thread as it reduces the use of system resources, (most posters come in on the first new post when browsing).

Just a reminder to those of you posting on here, that the point is to discuss what is happening and what may happen. Just because someone disagrees with you does not make them a bad person, so argue the point as much as you like but always play the ball, not the man (or woman).


With the goings on in Parliament today, I think it was necessary to end the prorogation of discussion here.


Got my phone out tonight , not something I usually do on holiday....Yate playing away at Exmouth in FACup replay so getting updates.......currently Yate bloody losing 1-0.......

Anyway point is I dont know what's going on in the UK re Parliament...
Can someone post an upshot of happenolings today by any chance?


northstandexile
First Team Regular

Sep 3, 2019, 8:53 PM

Posts: 1413
Location: Mansfield
Team(s): Mansfield Town


Views: 4691
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Does anyone on this board trust Boris Johnson in anything he says?

I know I donít.


steve walker
Administrator


Sep 3, 2019, 9:02 PM

Posts: 1807
Location: Staffordshire
Team(s):


Views: 4685
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Thanks to the EU scrapping roaming charges for mobile phone networks you should be able to check this without help from here in the same way that you can check on Yate updates. Can I recommend BBC Parliament channel.
But then you knew that already, you just wanted a summary you could argue against.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 3, 2019, 9:13 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 4680
     Re: [steve walker] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Thanks to the EU scrapping roaming charges for mobile phone networks you should be able to check this without help from here in the same way that you can check on Yate updates. Can I recommend BBC Parliament channel.
But then you knew that already, you just wanted a summary you could argue against.


That's me telt.....

Of course you're wrong....

Updates are via text from a friend and I'm not wsisting time scourin g the internet for info......I am on holiday y'know.... and the missus is off getting the cheese and biscuits....!

Btw roaming chargescetc are mere baubles of EU membership and perfectly negotiable outside of EU....
Yate bloody losing 2-0....shocking!


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Sep 3, 2019, 9:14 PM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 3, 2019, 9:33 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 4662
     Re: [northstandexile] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Does anyone on this board trust Boris Johnson in anything he says?

I know I donít.


The QC at the Scottish Court of Sessions came up with a cracker today as he spoke of Johnson

"he doesn't get the benefit of any doubt. You look at the record, you try as best you can to determine the credibility and reliability of what is said against a background of an individual whose personal professional and political life has been characterised by incontinent mendacity or to make it plainer an unwillingness or inability to acknowledge and speak the truth"


steve walker
Administrator


Sep 3, 2019, 9:39 PM

Posts: 1807
Location: Staffordshire
Team(s):


Views: 4660
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Thanks to the EU scrapping roaming charges for mobile phone networks you should be able to check this without help from here in the same way that you can check on Yate updates. Can I recommend BBC Parliament channel.
But then you knew that already, you just wanted a summary you could argue against.


That's me telt.....

Of course you're wrong....

Updates are via text from a friend and I'm not wsisting time scourin g the internet for info......I am on holiday y'know.... and the missus is off getting the cheese and biscuits....!

Btw roaming chargescetc are mere baubles of EU membership and perfectly negotiable outside of EU....
Yate bloody losing 2-0....shocking!



Okay against my better judgement I will bite... here is the summary as I see it...Ö.

Johnson is very hopeful of securing a deal with the EU before Oct 31st which includes removing the Irish problem and is getting closer to it according to him. There have been 'meaningful discussions'.

The EU say they have had no proposals so far from Johnson to solve this problem so their stance is as unchanged as it always has been.

MPs are voting on a motion right now to allow a vote on a bill that will force an extension from Oct 31 to Jan 31 to allow a General Election or a Referendum, whichever, without us having left with no deal. It looks likely they will win, should know in a hour or so.

Due to Parliament being shut down for five weeks next week which cannot be reversed they have to get this through before Friday as there will be no time when Parliament reconvenes as the Queens speech normally takes 5 days of debate. Unlike a suspension for the Conferences season the prorogue means that all pending legislation going through the process is effectively wiped out.

The motion apparently says that the UK cannot leave the EU with no deal unless a deal has been agreed by Parliament or that Parliament has voted for a no deal.

I'm no expert but I think that's an accurate summary.

Meanwhile several Tory MPs have said they don't give a shit about the threat of being de-selected as they won't stand for the Tories at the next election anyway and another has defected to the Lib Dems to wipe out the Government majority.

Certainly Johnsons premiership after 1 day in Parliament is going not so well.


Ronsdog
First Team Star


Sep 3, 2019, 9:45 PM

Posts: 2669
Location: Sarf London
Team(s): Lowestoft Town, Crystal Palace


Views: 4654
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Steve has asked that we restart with a new thread as it reduces the use of system resources, (most posters come in on the first new post when browsing).
.


Could someone explain to me why the EU Withdrawal Negotiations thread has been junked in favour of Brexit Again when the Wetherspoons thread continues unabated after some nine years in existence. Surely the same systems overload applies.

Or is it that the goings on of a pub chain are considered to be of more importance than the most lively political topic for over a generation?


leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 3, 2019, 9:49 PM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 4650
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The roaming across the EU is a very useful service and one that is down to EU regulation. Yes, the companies could have provided it without the EU insistence but just seeing the charges in Switzerland shows that this was not likely to happen.

Leaving the EU does not mean a sudden restart of high roaming charges - I would drop my current supplier if they restarted roaming charges and the others did not. Eventually, I would end up with an EU provider if all the UK suppliers resarted charges.

Anyway, taking the news from a single source, which may be biased it seems that Johnson has lost the arguments today and can be expected to lose the vote that follows. This only means that parliament gets to debate things tomorrow. If I was a Johnson supporting MP, (I am not), then I would still argue that he should lose the vote today - because if he can then win the vote tomorrow it gives some legitimacy to the course of action he is proposing.



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 3, 2019, 10:29 PM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 4625
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Parliament 328, Government 301.



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 3, 2019, 10:29 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 4624
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The roaming across the EU is a very useful service and one that is down to EU regulation. Yes, the companies could have provided it without the EU insistence but just seeing the charges in Switzerland shows that this was not likely to happen.

Leaving the EU does not mean a sudden restart of high roaming charges - I would drop my current supplier if they restarted roaming charges and the others did not. Eventually, I would end up with an EU provider if all the UK suppliers resarted charges.

Anyway, taking the news from a single source, which may be biased it seems that Johnson has lost the arguments today and can be expected to lose the vote that follows. This only means that parliament gets to debate things tomorrow. If I was a Johnson supporting MP, (I am not), then I would still argue that he should lose the vote today - because if he can then win the vote tomorrow it gives some legitimacy to the course of action he is proposing.


Ok......thanks.

Last post for a while from me...

From what little I can glean a GE is likely now and the Remainer alliance
has scuppered getting any changes to Withdrawal Deal.....Parliament will have set itself against the choice democratically expressed of and by the people ......

Tories will win the GE by a massive margin.
Labour dead in the water.


steve walker
Administrator


Sep 3, 2019, 10:36 PM

Posts: 1807
Location: Staffordshire
Team(s):


Views: 4619
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Steve has asked that we restart with a new thread as it reduces the use of system resources, (most posters come in on the first new post when browsing).
.


Could someone explain to me why the EU Withdrawal Negotiations thread has been junked in favour of Brexit Again when the Wetherspoons thread continues unabated after some nine years in existence. Surely the same systems overload applies.

Or is it that the goings on of a pub chain are considered to be of more importance than the most lively political topic for over a generation?



Since the EU thread had already been locked for a few days it seemed the perfect chance to start a new one.

It's nothing more sinister than that


buncranaboy
Qatar World Cup bid member!


Sep 3, 2019, 10:38 PM

Posts: 17970
Location: South Birmingham
Team(s): Barnstoneworth United; Bostock Stanley


Views: 4616
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Withdrawal deal ? Johnson had no intention of pursuing one. Meaningful discussions my arse.
You can't believe a single word he utters.......


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 4, 2019, 6:57 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 4533
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

It seems unlikely that the opposition parties are going to allow a general election before this legislation passes.

However, he has a couple more options;
1. He could issue new legislation allowing a general election, which would need a majority (not two-thirds majority), but it would be subject to ammendment.
2. He can ask the EU for an extension, as required by the new legislation, but then veto it as one of the 28 members has every right to.
3. He can allow the legislation to pass, then get a General Election, then seek to over-turn it. However, this is unlikely to happen before 31st October
4. The Leavers can try various tactics in the Lords (albeit they have a minority), such as trying to add ammendments or fillibuster.

However, having just dismissed 21 MPís from the Tory party, leaving him with 22 short of a working majority in Parliament, his options are receding.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 8:09 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 4520
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

He can also table of a vote of no confidence in himself.

He's such an inept chump he will lose that too.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 8:34 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 4513
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Good old Daily Mail has got hold of the updated Yellowhammer document that Gove wouldn't release in case it scared the public


EXCLUSIVE: No Deal Brexit could lead to months of chaos, public disorder and food shortages, updated Government dossier reveals

Leaked government document warns few individuals are prepared for No Deal
The 150-page-assessment outlines Government's contingency plans for No Deal
Includes five-page annexe with 'reasonable worst case planning assumptions'
Version seen by the Mail was due to be published by Gove but pulled last night


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/...tter_impression=true


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 4, 2019, 8:35 AM)


leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 4, 2019, 9:15 AM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 4505
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

If I understood correctly, the MPs were only threatened with withdrawal of the whip and deselection, and this will not be carried out if they return to the fold in today's debate. The warped logic of my mind says that it is right for today's debate to happen even if it ends in a Johnson victory. Some of the MPs that voted against him yesterday may well feel the same

A general election, while probable, is not the easiest way to settle matters. There is a risk that it ends up as a bipolar event between the "no-deal brexiters" and the "remainers", leaving those that want Brexit, but do not want no-deal with a stark choice. The fact that Johnson has been claiming to play a game of poker where the no-deal is a bluff in order to obtain a deal will confuse some into voting for something they do not want. It is very difficult to bluff in poker while all of your cards are face up, and I cannot see Johnson achieving this. He will of course try to heap the blame on this on the opposition, (especially the opposition within).

Throughout the year, as the government has stumbled over one vote after another it has been clear there is not a majority in Parliament for any of the three major options, (Repeal Article 50, The deal negotiated by Mrs May's team, No-Deal Brexit). If this is the case, then the logical answer is a new referendum - I would go a two question on the voting slip

  1. Do you agree with the Government's intention for Britain to exit the EU on (insert date here). Yes/No
  2. The Government's intention is to leave in accordance with the deal as set out, the alternative is to leave without a deal. If the vote is to exit the EU, then do you agree with the Government's intention to leave in accordance with the deal. Yes/No


I think the reason why this type of approach has not been taken by parliament is because regardless of the results it produces, there is currently a majority in the house that disagrees with it.

If we were to have the second referendum before an election and parliament still cannot agree to vote in accordance with results, then it is time for the general election with some MPs forced to go to their constituents and say that they voted against the clearly expressed views of the constituency.

[Yes, I can see at least one flaw in my argument but I have left that for someone else to point out]



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 9:53 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 4494
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
If I understood correctly, the MPs were only threatened with withdrawal of the whip and deselection, and this will not be carried out if they return to the fold in today's debate. The warped logic of my mind says that it is right for today's debate to happen even if it ends in a Johnson victory. Some of the MPs that voted against him yesterday may well feel the same


Andrea Loathsome made that claim last night.

She was quickly slapped down. They've gone.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/...-gets-no-10-19396802


hawkwind
First Team Star

Sep 4, 2019, 9:59 AM

Posts: 1998
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 4493
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The Conservative whip was withdrawn from 21 MPs last night.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 10:04 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 4490
     Re: [hawkwind] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The Conservative whip was withdrawn from 21 MPs last night.


Rory Stewart got his news by text message.


leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 4, 2019, 10:05 AM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 4490
     Re: [hawkwind] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I stand corrected - I saw the Leadsome quote yesterday and thought this was the decision



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 10:23 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 4479
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately




Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 4, 2019, 10:47 AM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 4468
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

As an election is now imminent, this is likely to be the biggest election of all time where tactical voting comes into play. I would expect the Tory and Brexit party to form a pact putting up one candidate.
Therefore, I would urge all remain/ against no deal parties to do the same, to put up just one candidate that has the best chance of defeating either of the above.
The worst possible scenario for remainers is that it should stop a Johnson majority.



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 1:15 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 4422
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Has anyone ever seen a PM get such a horse whipping at PMQs.

I almost felt sorry for him.


Blanc Mange
Youth Team Regular

Sep 4, 2019, 1:32 PM

Posts: 201
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 4415
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Iím no fan of Boris but youíve mustíve watching a different PMQís to me but saying that after Ian Blackfordís interminable 2nd question we probably both fell asleepLaugh


Karen Browne
First Team Sub


Sep 4, 2019, 2:24 PM

Posts: 998
Location: Pocklington, East Yorkshire
Team(s): Welwyn Garden City


Views: 1217
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Parliament 328, Government 301.


Who do Parliament get in the next round



Karen Browne
Spartan South Midlands League
Fixtures Officer


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 4, 2019, 2:27 PM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 1216
     Re: [Karen Browne] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Parliament 328, Government 301.


Who do Parliament get in the next round


The House of Lords. But thatís basically a walkover. Expect to see that in Ďmad resultsí


(This post was edited by 007Dale on Sep 4, 2019, 2:28 PM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 3:07 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 1198
     Re: [Blanc Mange] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Iím no fan of Boris but youíve mustíve watching a different PMQís to me but saying that after Ian Blackfordís interminable 2nd question we probably both fell asleepLaugh



Corbyn mastered him. 6 questions not one answer. Statesman v waffling, bluster, blunder and pathetic attempts at jokes. All Johnson could do was attack Corbyn

Singh Dhesi eating him alive. Instead of apologising all Johnson could do was attavk Corbyn

https://twitter.com/...218435554918400?s=20

Swinson talking to him like a naughty boy
https://twitter.com/...245163723591681?s=20

Margot James tearing into him from his own benches with cheers round the house

https://twitter.com/...237162551906304?s=20

Skewered by Vernon Coker and Dominic Grieve too

As the Politics Home editor wrote

"Oh dear. After a torrid first #PMQs, Boris Johnson headed for the exit - then had to be told to turn back so he can sit next to Sajid Javid for the Spending Review. Not surprised he wanted to make a quick getaway, to be honest."

or John Crace
"Itís turning into Groundhog Day for Boris Johnson. Heís really not very good at this. Heís making Corbyn look brilliant"

Kevin McGuire
"And sacked Tory MP Margot James tears into Johnson over Dominic Cummingsí reign of terror. Uncomfortable #PMQs for Johnson and now Cummings"

"Boris Johnsonís #pmqs debut was the worst Iíve seen though in fairness Iíve only watched those of May, Cameron, Brown, Blair & Major. Binary Law mightíve struggled."


Yes I think you were watching something different. What did you thiink was good about the version you saw?


Blanc Mange
Youth Team Regular

Sep 4, 2019, 4:19 PM

Posts: 201
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 1176
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I never said he was good or bad but as a Tory rebel supporter he couldíve been better,as for a politician never answering a question well how unusual,I do like that out of the 3 reviews youíve chosen two of them happen to be of labour persuasion....strange thatWink


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 6:28 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 1133
     Re: [Blanc Mange] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Well, I wouldnít like to be Dilyn the dog when Boris gets home.

ďIs that the PM shouting? The last time he did that the police had to be calledĒ
John Macdonald


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 4, 2019, 6:55 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 1120
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Brexit has nothing of benefit for British working class people only the rich. I am struggling to understand why it's being so vehemently campaigned for.



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !

(This post was edited by Towlawtom on Sep 4, 2019, 6:55 PM)


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 4, 2019, 6:57 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 1117
     Re: [Blanc Mange] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

When the Daily Mail describes his performance at a "calamitous" PMQs as "nervous and flustered" I think we can safely say it was a car crash debut.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/...calamitous-PMQs.html

I found it interesting to see how badly he reacted under pressure. Not a good omen given current circumstances. I never thought a UK PM would use the insult "big girl's blouse" in the House of Commons. Other than that low point, his approach appeared to consist of bluster and pre-prepared soundbite jibes.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 7:41 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 1104
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The contrast with the considered, measured, polite style of Corbyn was remarkable.


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 4, 2019, 7:42 PM)


Tykeoldboy
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 4, 2019, 8:09 PM

Posts: 3268
Location:
Team(s): Doncaster Rovers, Everton, Mablethorpe


Views: 1091
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Johnson didn't do himself any favours by referring to the opposion leader as Corbyn, the speaker immediately pulled him up on that. Johnson also referred Corbyn as a "chlorinated chicken" and "Caracas" a play on the word "Crackers" and referring to the current problems in Venezuela



The feeling of utter devastation when you pick up your mug and realise you already finished your tea.

(This post was edited by Tykeoldboy on Sep 4, 2019, 10:04 PM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 4, 2019, 9:45 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 1063
     Re: [Tykeoldboy] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

and "big girl's blouse"


Tykeoldboy
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 4, 2019, 10:04 PM

Posts: 3268
Location:
Team(s): Doncaster Rovers, Everton, Mablethorpe


Views: 1054
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

No "No deal Brexit" and no General Election. Not a great day for the new PM with two votes and two defeats. Now the UK bumbles along with a minority government.



The feeling of utter devastation when you pick up your mug and realise you already finished your tea.


splodge
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 5, 2019, 12:42 AM

Posts: 4831
Location:
Team(s): Fareham Town, Hampshire League


Views: 1015
     Re: [Tykeoldboy] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

When Boris lost the vote last night and then got up to speak, with the look of clear anger on his face, I was half expecting something akin to Richard Harris in the film version of Cromwell when he spoke to Parliament, soldiers coming in, blocking the doorways, arresting people who didn't agree with him.



www.twitter.com/splodgey
www.facebook.com/paulsplodgeproctor


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 5, 2019, 11:51 AM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 941
     Re: [splodge] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Perhaps the problem is we ended up with the wrong Johnson.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/...uk-politics-49594793

Maybe we should have tried to persuade Joe or Labour's Alan to be PM.

.


leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 5, 2019, 12:57 PM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 920
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

So can we have the next election with the correct Johnson, and maybe the correct Milliband.
(If the UK gets relegated in the meantime, I suggest Gary Johnson)



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



dottirofhod
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 5, 2019, 1:04 PM

Posts: 13738
Location: The North. 'Ich hassen lehm kopfs'
Team(s): Crewe Alex and obviously England.(Unlike a lot on here)


Views: 917
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I suggest Erin =






July 1, 2019 to June 30,2020 = 87 / 75 / 12 / inc 3 x 0-0's. (You know my rules) @ 14 / 10 / 2019.
2019/20. Benelux = Bel = 0-0-0-(I(MUI-I)-0-0)-(0-2-1-1)/ Lux = 0-2 / Neth = 0-0-0-(1 - 2) Others France = 0-0 / Germany =0-0-0 / Italy =0-1(Act 2- Frosinone new)./ Iberia = P = 0-0 & S = 0-0.

Now blogging at https://eccentricity.video.blog/



Tykeoldboy
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 5, 2019, 1:33 PM

Posts: 3268
Location:
Team(s): Doncaster Rovers, Everton, Mablethorpe


Views: 903
     Re: [dottirofhod] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I suggest Holly Johnson then we can all "Relax". See what I did there? Welcome to the displeasuredome



The feeling of utter devastation when you pick up your mug and realise you already finished your tea.


dottirofhod
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 5, 2019, 1:44 PM

Posts: 13738
Location: The North. 'Ich hassen lehm kopfs'
Team(s): Crewe Alex and obviously England.(Unlike a lot on here)


Views: 897
     Re: [Tykeoldboy] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

 I do hope the two tribes don't rage too hard and with the power of love learn to relax and cum to a decision.



July 1, 2019 to June 30,2020 = 87 / 75 / 12 / inc 3 x 0-0's. (You know my rules) @ 14 / 10 / 2019.
2019/20. Benelux = Bel = 0-0-0-(I(MUI-I)-0-0)-(0-2-1-1)/ Lux = 0-2 / Neth = 0-0-0-(1 - 2) Others France = 0-0 / Germany =0-0-0 / Italy =0-1(Act 2- Frosinone new)./ Iberia = P = 0-0 & S = 0-0.

Now blogging at https://eccentricity.video.blog/



Tykeoldboy
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 5, 2019, 5:19 PM

Posts: 3268
Location:
Team(s): Doncaster Rovers, Everton, Mablethorpe


Views: 816
     Re: [dottirofhod] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I do hope the two tribes don't rage too hard and with the power of love learn to relax and cum to a decision.

Shouldn't this be Power of Gove Laugh



The feeling of utter devastation when you pick up your mug and realise you already finished your tea.


KnowYourMarket
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 5, 2019, 9:56 PM

Posts: 10970
Location: Longton, Stoke-on-Trent - Ar Bay a Brummie
Team(s): WBA, FC Saarbruecken, Brierley Hill Alliance (RIP)


Views: 751
     Re: [Tykeoldboy] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

As Hilary Benn said. Once we leave the EU (with or without a deal) that will be the end of the beginning. The beginning has already taken 3 years.

This will drag on for years whether we stay, leave or do the hokey cokey. I cannot see a time in the near future where Brexiteers or Remainers will change their mind.



Last ground visited(update requested by Spud): Wellington . New grounds 18/19: 38


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 6, 2019, 7:22 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 661
     Re: [KnowYourMarket] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
As Hilary Benn said. Once we leave the EU (with or without a deal) that will be the end of the beginning. The beginning has already taken 3 years.

This will drag on for years whether we stay, leave or do the hokey cokey. I cannot see a time in the near future where Brexiteers or Remainers will change their mind.


Some Brexiteers have been doing.

There is now a majority favouring Remain.


leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 6, 2019, 7:42 AM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 658
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

PaulC - that is according to pollsters. Whether you or I like it or not, Yatesman has always been right in saying the only votes that matter have been won by Brexit supporters.

While I have always been a remainer, I do not believe we should ignore the referendum on a change of parliament. If we are to offer remain back to the populace, then another referendum is required. See my "two question" scenario a few posts back and note that the questions are slanted to favour leaving with a deal.



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 6, 2019, 8:20 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 643
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
PaulC - that is according to pollsters. Whether you or I like it or not, Yatesman has always been right in saying the only votes that matter have been won by Brexit supporters.

While I have always been a remainer, I do not believe we should ignore the referendum on a change of parliament. If we are to offer remain back to the populace, then another referendum is required. See my "two question" scenario a few posts back and note that the questions are slanted to favour leaving with a deal.


Absolutely. Another referendum is required. Itís so obvious itís hardly worth mentioning.

The polls have shown for a long time that the tide has turned. Thatís why Brexiteers donít want one. I regularly cite latest polls because Brexiteers regularly parrot ďnothing has changedĒ ďwe still want outĒ when that clearly isnít true.

They are happy to hold 3 complex GE votes in 4 years but not two binary referendums in 3.5 years.


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 6, 2019, 8:24 AM)


Ronsdog
First Team Star


Sep 6, 2019, 9:11 AM

Posts: 2669
Location: Sarf London
Team(s): Lowestoft Town, Crystal Palace


Views: 628
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
PaulC - that is according to pollsters. Whether you or I like it or not, Yatesman has always been right in saying the only votes that matter have been won by Brexit supporters.

While I have always been a remainer, I do not believe we should ignore the referendum on a change of parliament. If we are to offer remain back to the populace, then another referendum is required. See my "two question" scenario a few posts back and note that the questions are slanted to favour leaving with a deal.



Absolutely. Another referendum is required. Itís so obvious itís hardly worth mentioning.

The polls have shown for a long time that the tide has turned. Thatís why Brexiteers donít want one. I regularly cite latest polls because Brexiteers regularly parrot ďnothing has changedĒ ďwe still want outĒ when that clearly isnít true.

They are happy to hold 3 complex GE votes in 4 years but not two binary referendums in 3.5 years.


Would a second referendum solve the problem that currently exists?

Consider for a moment the possibility that it returned the same result.
Jo Swinson the leader of the Lib Dems has stated publicly that she would not or ever accept such a scenario. Pretty undemocratic and illiberal if you ask me.

The current stated position of the Labour Party is that they would campaign to remain, even if they held power and managed to negotiate a new deal, as was stated by their Foreign Affairs spokesman on yesterday evenings Question Time. What a shambolic position to hold.

No, the only way forward is to hold another GE and hope that the country will give a clear majority to one party which can then end this interminable deadlock.

Either way it would be a travesty if the original result is not enacted.


Part-Timer
Chelsea Transfer Target

Sep 6, 2019, 12:23 PM

Posts: 4526
Location: Huntingdonshire
Team(s): Brentford, Bradford City, Peterborough United, Yaxley


Views: 577
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
PaulC - that is according to pollsters. Whether you or I like it or not, Yatesman has always been right in saying the only votes that matter have been won by Brexit supporters.

While I have always been a remainer, I do not believe we should ignore the referendum on a change of parliament. If we are to offer remain back to the populace, then another referendum is required. See my "two question" scenario a few posts back and note that the questions are slanted to favour leaving with a deal.



Absolutely. Another referendum is required. Itís so obvious itís hardly worth mentioning.

The polls have shown for a long time that the tide has turned. Thatís why Brexiteers donít want one. I regularly cite latest polls because Brexiteers regularly parrot ďnothing has changedĒ ďwe still want outĒ when that clearly isnít true.

They are happy to hold 3 complex GE votes in 4 years but not two binary referendums in 3.5 years.


Would a second referendum solve the problem that currently exists?

Consider for a moment the possibility that it returned the same result.
Jo Swinson the leader of the Lib Dems has stated publicly that she would not or ever accept such a scenario. Pretty undemocratic and illiberal if you ask me.

The current stated position of the Labour Party is that they would campaign to remain, even if they held power and managed to negotiate a new deal, as was stated by their Foreign Affairs spokesman on yesterday evenings Question Time. What a shambolic position to hold.

[b[No, the only way forward is to hold another GE and hope that the country will give a clear majority to one party which can then end this interminable deadlock.[b/]

Either way it would be a travesty if the original result is not enacted.

Lest we forget: neither of the two main parties have a united view on what should happen. Even a parliament with one of them in a clear majority could leave us in exactly the same position as we are at the moment. Only a Liberal Democrat Party or a Brexit Party majority is going to resolve that conundrum. Either of those would, of course, cause all manner of other problems.


Ronsdog
First Team Star


Sep 6, 2019, 1:05 PM

Posts: 2669
Location: Sarf London
Team(s): Lowestoft Town, Crystal Palace


Views: 557
     Re: [Part-Timer] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

[b[No, the only way forward is to hold another GE and hope that the country will give a clear majority to one party which can then end this interminable deadlock.[b/]

Either way it would be a travesty if the original result is not enacted.

Lest we forget: neither of the two main parties have a united view on what should happen. Even a parliament with one of them in a clear majority could leave us in exactly the same position as we are at the moment. Only a Liberal Democrat Party or a Brexit Party majority is going to resolve that conundrum. Either of those would, of course, cause all manner of other problems.


When Johnson assumed leadership of the Tory Party he did so with a clear agenda. He assumed power with a clear message to become the party of leave. In that case his prorogation of parliament was clearly designed to instil discipline throughout his party by confronting his hardcore opponents which once they voted against allowed him to expel them. His party was already split and he was always leading a minority government in all but name. The sackings merely formalised this.

Something that the hapless May should have done when her cabinet leaked and briefed against her.

The Remainers saw the purge of their favourite Tories as a terrible loss of talent, a cataclysmic blow to the credibility of the party, its final death even; yet to Leave voters, losing anti-Brexit irreconcilables, especially overrated establishment figures, was a huge step in the right direction and proof of Borisís seriousness.

In any case, the Prime Minister needs a party with a single message: every candidate will have to sign up to his plans. This will be the only way that he can fight off the Brexit Party. If he wins, perhaps with a slender majority, Johnson will need to be able to count on every one of his MPs.

Whatever the outcome the Tories are now being corralled into a united force under his plan to exit the EU.

Only a GE will see if this high risk plan works.

Of course the remainers will attempt to delay a future GE for fear of this strategy being successful.


(This post was edited by Ronsdog on Sep 6, 2019, 1:17 PM)


MelChester
Junior Team Regular

Sep 6, 2019, 1:17 PM

Posts: 41
Location: Cotswolds
Team(s):


Views: 895
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

A right wing elite party who want to leave with no deal so it's leaders don't have to abide by forth coming EU rules about offshore investments.

Don't think 17.4 million people voted for that, 25 to 30 million voted for remain or soft / medium Brexit .Not quite sure where no deal creapt in other than for the rich to get richer. I dislike the far left almost as much as I do the fat right.


northstandexile
First Team Regular

Sep 6, 2019, 1:28 PM

Posts: 1413
Location: Mansfield
Team(s): Mansfield Town


Views: 889
     Re: [MelChester] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

What I canít get over is how can any deal be financially better off than remaining.

No country is going to give us a better trade deal than the one we have as part of the EU.


Ronsdog
First Team Star


Sep 6, 2019, 1:34 PM

Posts: 2669
Location: Sarf London
Team(s): Lowestoft Town, Crystal Palace


Views: 888
     Re: [MelChester] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Not quite sure where no deal creapt in other than for the rich to get richer. I dislike the far left almost as much as I do the fat right.


It crept in as a strategy to unite the Leave vote and nullify the threat to the Tories of the Brexit party. If Johnson is right in his thinking then after over three years of dithering and obfuscation by Parliamentarians, we will finally rid ourselves of the EU yoke.

As a leaver, who is neither rich nor privilidged, along with 34% of the total electorate I support this way forward. The prize is far more important than the means to it.


(This post was edited by Ronsdog on Sep 6, 2019, 1:37 PM)


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 6, 2019, 1:50 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 867
     Re: [northstandexile] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
What I canít get over is how can any deal be financially better off than remaining.

No country is going to give us a better trade deal than the one we have as part of the EU.


Yes but at least we will be free, able to take control of our borders, Make our own laws and get rid of all those unelected bureaucrats LaughLaugh



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 6, 2019, 2:38 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 844
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Something that the hapless May should have done when her cabinet leaked and briefed against her.

Except May was really for staying. The Chequers business showed this, when Baker, Davis and Johnson realised what an appalling document the WA was.


northstandexile
First Team Regular

Sep 6, 2019, 6:28 PM

Posts: 1413
Location: Mansfield
Team(s): Mansfield Town


Views: 786
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
What I canít get over is how can any deal be financially better off than remaining.

No country is going to give us a better trade deal than the one we have as part of the EU.


Yes but at least we will be free, able to take control of our borders, Make our own laws and get rid of all those unelected bureaucrats LaughLaugh


Control of our borders? When we have no border controls between NI and ROI.


MelChester
Junior Team Regular

Sep 6, 2019, 6:49 PM

Posts: 41
Location: Cotswolds
Team(s):


Views: 776
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Not quite sure where no deal creapt in other than for the rich to get ricaher. I dislike the far left almost as much as I do the fat right.


It crept in as a strategy to unite the Leave vote and nullify the threat to the Tories of the Brexit party. If Johnson is right in his thinking then after over three years of dithering and obfuscation by Parliamentarians, we will finally rid ourselves of the EU yoke.

As a leaver, who is neither rich nor privilidged, along with 34% of the total electorate I support this way forward. The prize is far more important than the means to it.


Itís actually split the leave vote, because many did not vote for or do not want no deal. Many leave voters would prefer to remain than leave with a no deal.


steve walker
Administrator


Sep 6, 2019, 7:04 PM

Posts: 1807
Location: Staffordshire
Team(s):


Views: 764
     Re: [MelChester] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
Not quite sure where no deal creapt in other than for the rich to get ricaher. I dislike the far left almost as much as I do the fat right.


It crept in as a strategy to unite the Leave vote and nullify the threat to the Tories of the Brexit party. If Johnson is right in his thinking then after over three years of dithering and obfuscation by Parliamentarians, we will finally rid ourselves of the EU yoke.

As a leaver, who is neither rich nor privilidged, along with 34% of the total electorate I support this way forward. The prize is far more important than the means to it.


Itís actually split the leave vote, because many did not vote for or do not want no deal. Many leave voters would prefer to remain than leave with a no deal.



I don't think 'no deal' was ever touted as a favourable outcome by the Leave campaign in the run up to the Referendum. We were told that since we were already compliant with EU regulations it could be sorted as the easiest deal in history.

Similarly the Irish border situation was hardly ever mentioned unless I am going senile and forget and when I look back on Google the few references there are to it were dismissed by many including our current PM as being "not a problem".

Certainly seems to be a problem now.


Chris1963
Man City Transfer Target!

Sep 6, 2019, 8:35 PM

Posts: 6942
Location: North London
Team(s): Oxford United / Groundhopper


Views: 725
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
[reply

Yes but at least we will be free, able to take control of our borders, Make our own laws and get rid of all those unelected bureaucrats


1) We already have control of our own borders. We have never been part of the Schengen area. This is due to the UK being an island nation.

2) We already make our own laws, in our own Parliament. Same with all the other EU members. The EU allows them to make their own laws.

3) Unelected bureaucrats? You mean the British Civil Service?

The truth is that Brexiteers are fighting an imaginary dragon. Rather than see the EU as an enemy, they should look to it as a friend and a protector against Vladimir Putin, who would love to see the EU collapse.


Richard Rundle
Man City Transfer Target!

Sep 6, 2019, 9:27 PM

Posts: 8469
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 708
     Re: [Chris1963] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The truth is that Brexiteers are fighting an imaginary dragon. Rather than see the EU as an enemy, they should look to it as a friend and a protector against Vladimir Putin, who would love to see the EU collapse.


And you could easily replace the name "Vladimir Putin" with the name "Donald Trump" and the post still makes sense.


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 6, 2019, 10:59 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 676
     Re: [Chris1963] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
[reply

Yes but at least we will be free, able to take control of our borders, Make our own laws and get rid of all those unelected bureaucrats


1) We already have control of our own borders. We have never been part of the Schengen area. This is due to the UK being an island nation.

2) We already make our own laws, in our own Parliament. Same with all the other EU members. The EU allows them to make their own laws.

3) Unelected bureaucrats? You mean the British Civil Service?

The truth is that Brexiteers are fighting an imaginary dragon. Rather than see the EU as an enemy, they should look to it as a friend and a protector against Vladimir Putin, who would love to see the EU collapse.


My comments were of course said in jest Chris1963. Its the usual bullshit arguments the leavers give when asked why they voted leave.

Usually if someone says to you " The Eu is run by Unelected bureaucrats", It would be common sense to research how our UK parliament is run where the EU puts our so called democratic process to shame!



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 6, 2019, 11:25 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 672
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Unelected bureaucrats. Blimey, we have an unelected legislature packed with has beens, cronies and people who have bankrolled parties.

Add to that the anti-democratic chicanery of Johnson and the UK really isn;t much better than a banana republic.


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 6, 2019, 11:31 PM)


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 7, 2019, 6:40 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 627
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

[reply/]
Add to that the anti-democratic chicanery of Johnson and the UK really isn;t much better than a banana republic.


I know, that undemocratic Johnson, fancy trying to call a General Election in order to deliver a referendum result voted for by the people.


MelChester
Junior Team Regular

Sep 7, 2019, 8:03 AM

Posts: 41
Location: Cotswolds
Team(s):


Views: 609
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
[reply/]
Add to that the anti-democratic chicanery of Johnson and the UK really isn;t much better than a banana republic.


I know, that undemocratic Johnson, fancy trying to call a General Election in order to deliver a referendum result voted for by the people.


No he doesn't, he wants to deliver a Brexit very few voted for and only a small percentage want. The circumstances have been explained many times this week about him calling an election at this time is not of benefit to the other parties and the only person it would help is Boris and his cronies. They have engineered this mess let them stew. Many remainers would except a soft Brexit that was proposed in 2016, but the Tories have been infilttrated by a right wing elite who want to force a no deal to feather their on nests. If a no deal happened there would be very few winners and the worst losers would not be many remainers but those who are less well off and who voted for Brexit. They will be the hardest hit.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 7, 2019, 8:06 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 609
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
[reply/]
Add to that the anti-democratic chicanery of Johnson and the UK really isn;t much better than a banana republic.


I know, that undemocratic Johnson, fancy trying to call a General Election in order to deliver a referendum result voted for by the people.


We are getting a General Election. After Johnson has obeyed the will of our sivereign Parliament.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 7, 2019, 8:43 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 597
     Re: [MelChester] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
[reply/]
Add to that the anti-democratic chicanery of Johnson and the UK really isn;t much better than a banana republic.


I know, that undemocratic Johnson, fancy trying to call a General Election in order to deliver a referendum result voted for by the people.


No he doesn't, he wants to deliver a Brexit very few voted for and only a small percentage want.


Iím intrigued as to why, if as you say so few want this Brexit, why opposition parties are so frightened to have an election - it can only be because they know exactly who will win and why.

Pro-Brexit parties have won every national election since 2014. Theyíll win the 2019 General Election whenever it comes. At worst, all this legislation has done is delay Brexit to 31st January, when Boris (with a new Parliament reflecting the will of the people) will enact a Brexit deal or no-deal. And as all this happens, labour continue to shed votes to parties with a clearly defined Brexit position.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 7, 2019, 8:53 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 590
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
[reply/]
Add to that the anti-democratic chicanery of Johnson and the UK really isn;t much better than a banana republic.


I know, that undemocratic Johnson, fancy trying to call a General Election in order to deliver a referendum result voted for by the people.


No he doesn't, he wants to deliver a Brexit very few voted for and only a small percentage want.


Iím intrigued as to why, if as you say so few want this Brexit, why opposition parties are so frightened to have an election - it can only be because they know exactly who will win and why.

Pro-Brexit parties have won every national election since 2014. Theyíll win the 2019 General Election whenever it comes. At worst, all this legislation has done is delay Brexit to 31st January, when Boris (with a new Parliament reflecting the will of the people) will enact a Brexit deal or no-deal. And as all this happens, labour continue to shed votes to parties with a clearly defined Brexit position.


You need to think things through rather than just recycle Tory press releases.

There will be a General Election. It will take place after 31 October.

15 October is what Johnson wants. He is begging, pleading for that date because two days later he has to report back to Brussels. How embarrassing will that be?

By 31 October he will probably be forced to resign because the PM will either have to beg for an extension or revoke Article50.

The opposition parties have him and the Tories by the short and curlies.

The Tory press spin the yarn about Corbyn being cowardly, those who believe what Tories tell them swallow it, whilst the reality is the opposition parties are playing a blinder, They have given Johnson and Cummings a thrashing.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 7, 2019, 8:58 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 586
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Oh, as for Pro Brexit parties winning n 2019, whenever it comes, study the latest poll.


ICM (Election Before Oct 31) - 2019-09-03
Con: 37%
Lab: 30%
LDem: 16%
BRX: 9%
Grn: 4%
SNP: 3%
UKIP: 1%
PC: 1%

Projection
Con: 340 (+22)
Lab: 217 (-45)
SNP: 41 (+6)
LDem: 30 (+18)
PC: 3 (-1)
Grn: 1 (-)
Changes w/ 2017



ICM (Election after Oct 31 and still in EU) - 2019-09-03
Lab: 28%
Con: 28%
BRX: 18%
LDem: 17%
Grn: 4%
SNP: 3%
UKIP: 2%
PC: 1%
CHUK: 0%


Projection
Con: 266 (-52)
Lab: 261 (-1)
SNP: 50 (+15)
LDem: 50 (+38)
PC: 3 (-1)
BRX: 1 (+1)
Grn: 1 (-)
Changes w/ 2017


MelChester
Junior Team Regular

Sep 7, 2019, 8:59 AM

Posts: 41
Location: Cotswolds
Team(s):


Views: 585
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I said no deal not Brexit, they are very different.

The election thing has been explained to death, the other parties are not stupid.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 7, 2019, 9:37 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 574
     Re: [MelChester] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Marina Hydeís opinion piece on Boris Johnson is a gem.


ďAs for his turns away from Westminster, Thursday afternoon found him at a Yorkshire police academy, where he appeared deeply confused. He resembled a political Elvis Ė twilight years Ė whoíd had to be slapped awake on the tour bus by his manager, given some of his special medicine, and shoved on to greet the LA crowd with the words ďHello Philadelphia!Ē This, but in Wakefield.Ē

https://www.theguardian.com/...escort-conservatives


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 7, 2019, 9:49 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 569
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

ďYes, sir, of course youíre Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.Ē




MelChester
Junior Team Regular

Sep 7, 2019, 10:30 AM

Posts: 41
Location: Cotswolds
Team(s):


Views: 552
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

At the moment x 2!


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 7, 2019, 11:30 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 530
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

This is so funny, one fact destroys all this Remain propaganda; Jeremy Corbyn will still be Labour leader after 31st October.

The U.K. will not elect a hard-left Government, before or after the 31st October.

Post any Opinion Poll you can find, it doesnít matter, because when the British are eventually allowed to go to the polls, the Brexit supporting parties will win. Theyíve won actual elections consistently over the last six years.

The country still wants to leave, we will leave. 31st October, 31st January or any date in between.

Iíll let you go and find another opinion poll to stand behind...


MelChester
Junior Team Regular

Sep 7, 2019, 12:23 PM

Posts: 41
Location: Cotswolds
Team(s):


Views: 510
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Of course they won't elect a far left government, like they won't elect a far right one either. Both the Tories and Labour have alienated many supporters to move to the centre ground. If pacts are not formed 4 or 5 parties will get a reasonable number of seats and no one will be in overall control. We will probably have a situation where the party that gets the most votes (not seats) will not be in power


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 7, 2019, 12:40 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 505
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Post any Opinion Poll you can find, it doesnít matter, because when the British are eventually allowed to go to the polls, the Brexit supporting parties will win.


Can you explain why the polls shows supporters of pro-Brexit supporters are now in the minority?

In the absence of Yatesman, you are doing a great job on his behalf, arguing against reality.


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 7, 2019, 1:21 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 952
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Being in the EU costs each person in the UK a whole 34p a day .... 34p a day!!


For all the access, opportunities, no European war conflicts for 70 years, freedom of trading, protection of rights and safety standards for UK citizens, I would happily pay a hell of a lot more!

eu-rope.ideasoneurope.eu/2019/03/03/eu-membership-is-a-bargain


Do brexit voters still believe this myth that the EU "tells us what to do"? I really wish people would research the facts and stop spouting this Shite!. All laws passed by the European parliament have to be agreed by ALL member states. Each country can use its veto if it disagrees, including the UK - therefore, all the laws passed by the EU which affect the UK have been agreed with by the UK!! And every voter in the UK gets a vote in deciding who they send to the European parliament to make these decisions on our behalf. Unfortunately, lots of people vote to send someone like Farage who sits on his arse, fails to attend any meetings, but happily collects the cash thank you very much.



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 7, 2019, 5:48 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 925
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

QMV has all but replaced unanimity and the veto.


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 7, 2019, 10:20 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 869
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

It's all going Pete Tong for Boris, Amber Rudd has resigned from Cabinet and Conservative party.!



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 7, 2019, 11:08 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 854
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
It's all going Pete Tong for Boris, Amber Rudd has resigned from Cabinet and Conservative party.!


ďPolitical vandalismĒ

ĎAssault on decency and democracyĒ

ďI no longer believe leaving with a deal is the governmentís main ibjectiveĒ


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 8, 2019, 12:18 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 833
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

And yet, those with a perversion to remain still donít understand the mood of the electorate.


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 8, 2019, 4:27 AM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 805
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

"perversion to remain"?

I suppose it would be equally valid/invalid to speak of "perversion to leave".

Maybe we should stick to describing the different sides as being those who believe the UK is best served by staying in the EU and those who believe the UK is best served by leaving the EU.

We're moving into dangerously tense and emotive times. Some of the exchanges inside Parliament last week were bitter and vitriolic. And the atmosphere between the rival demos today was toxic and near violent.

I don't see the point of a second Referendum when it appears that whichever side won it would be by a very narrow margin. And I'm not convinced that a General Election would produce a clear majority for either side.

Although I voted remain in 2016 I think that ship has sailed. Like Kinnock Junior I think the best or least worst way out of this mess would be to try May's deal once more. There appear to be plenty of Labour MPs who, with no-deal exit looming, now fervently wish they'd voted in favour of it last time out.

.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 8, 2019, 6:56 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 797
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
"perversion to remain"?

I suppose it would be equally valid/invalid to speak of "perversion to leave".

.


No, the language is specifically and only appropriate to be used for remainers wishing to block the will of the people.

Hereís the dictionary definition of the word;
ďDistortion or corruption of the original courseĒ

Personally donít think it could be swapped as youíve suggested.


leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 8, 2019, 7:44 AM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 793
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Perversion to Remain, Perversion to Brexit?
I think you will find the problem is the potential no-deal Brexit, which many in the Conservative Party will not accept, even though they accept Brexit per se.


It is the distrust of Johnson's policies within his own party that is tearing his government apart.



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 8, 2019, 8:11 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 785
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
And yet, those with a perversion to remain still donít understand the mood of the electorate.


Can you explain these riddles to me.

IN 2016 we voted narrowly to leave

In 2019 all the polls indicate we want to remain.

Why should a decision made in 2016 trump the will of the people in 2019?

Why should we punish ourselves by doing something we no longer appear to want to do?

Shouldn't a confirmatory referendum be the obvious solution? Only one group is against such a referendum - why is that?

Only 35% want to leave iwithout a deal. Why should we leave without a deal?


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 8, 2019, 8:49 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 771
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Here is where iím at with Brexit;

1. Parliament doesnít reflect the British Peopleís position on Brexit. Thatís factual. 52/48 public view, majority of MPís are remain.

2. Parliament will never vote for a deal, whatever deal, whateverís in it. The Labour Party policy is to campaign against any Tory deal. Even if itís the best deal in the world, Parliament will vote against it. Boris knows that, we all know that.

3. Therefore we need a new Parliament, whether to approve a cracking new deal (unlikely weíll get this from the EU) or to allow a no-deal Brexit.

4. I believe the British people will deliver a pro-Brexit Parliament in 2019 (my opinion), as they overwhelmingly thought they were doing in 2017.

5. However, if the voters deliver a hung parliament (or worse), then I would conclude the only way out of this is for another referendum.

I personally donít believe weíll need a new referendum after the GE, because people will get the Leave Parliament they were promised in 2017. However, if people truly have changed there mind (& no national votes since 2016 have indicated that) then weíll get a Remain parliament and consequently a second referendum.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 8, 2019, 8:54 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 766
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

 

1 The 52/48 split was three and a half years ago. Not now.
2 The Labour party is irrelevant if the Tories had delivered on their promises
3 Only 35% want no deal
4 The only way that will happen is through the vageries of our electoral system. The majority now supports remain parties.
5 The EU may decide enough is enough. No extension without referendum,
6 Johnson is an incompetent, lying buffoon.


Richard Rundle
Man City Transfer Target!

Sep 8, 2019, 8:54 AM

Posts: 8469
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 766
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Here is where iím at with Brexit;

1. Parliament doesnít reflect the British Peopleís position on Brexit. Thatís factual. 52/48 public view, majority of MPís are remain.


Those "majority of MPs" were elected with their views on remain/leave well known, 12 months after the referendum. The people of the UK elected those members with those views so perhaps it's the poeple's fault that they elected the wrong MPs?


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 8, 2019, 12:41 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 714
     Re: [Richard Rundle] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The voice of Brexit

https://twitter.com/...348038608408576?s=20


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 8, 2019, 3:00 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 682
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To


That's shocking!

Brexit supporters can't defend that by saying your are bound to get the odd idiot because there are several odd idiots in that clip.



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


Ronsdog
First Team Star


Sep 8, 2019, 3:00 PM

Posts: 2669
Location: Sarf London
Team(s): Lowestoft Town, Crystal Palace


Views: 681
     Re: [Richard Rundle] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The whole sorry mess that is Brexit may yet be taken out of Parliaments hands if reports coming out of France are to be believed....

"There will be no extension to Brexit in the current circumstances",

according to the France's Foreign Minister.

Jean-Yves Le Drian said on Sunday that as things stand, a delay beyond the October 31 deadline would not be granted.

Asked if a Brexit delay was possible, the French minister told Europe 1 radio not under the current conditions.

"We are not going to do [extend] this every three months," he added..........

Suits me Cool


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 8, 2019, 3:05 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 679
     Re: [Richard Rundle] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Here is where iím at with Brexit;

1. Parliament doesnít reflect the British Peopleís position on Brexit. Thatís factual. 52/48 public view, majority of MPís are remain.


Those "majority of MPs" were elected with their views on remain/leave well known, 12 months after the referendum. The people of the UK elected those members with those views so perhaps it's the poeple's fault that they elected the wrong MPs?


Interesting also that the majority of the tory mps that lost the whip the majority of their constituents voted remain.. SO they were sacked for going against their constituents wishes.



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 8, 2019, 3:10 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 677
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Oh wad some pow'r the giftie gie us, to see oorsels as others see us.

The view from Canada


ďBut the position of Mr. Johnsonís new government is that since Britain voted for the idea of skydiving, then skydiving there must be. On Oct. 31, Britain has no option but to jump out of a plane, parachute or no parachute.Ē

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/...ed+Web+Article+Links


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 8, 2019, 6:49 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 625
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Oh wad some pow'r the giftie gie us, to see oorsels as others see us.

The view from Canada


ďBut the position of Mr. Johnsonís new government is that since Britain voted for the idea of skydiving, then skydiving there must be. On Oct. 31, Britain has no option but to jump out of a plane, parachute or no parachute.Ē

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/...ed+Web+Article+Links

Worrying about the view of another nation's media is no substitute for democracy.

Selective polling is no substitute for democracy.

Parliamentary distaste for the Express wishes ofvthechoi polloi is no substitute for democracy.

The only 'opinon'.....The only 'statistic'.....The only 'poll' that matters is the one expressed by the UK electorate in 2016.

There is no such phenomenon as a 'narrow' victory in a fptp electoral plebiscite.

The vote was fair, legal and open to all.

There was no 'deal's requisite in delivering Brexit , even if optimal.
Anyway, that bird flew the minute Remainers broke our democratic contract that requires losers' consent.
Their undermining of our negotiating position and cohorting with foreign interests has hamstrung the Govt for the past 3yrs.

No Deal is the Brexit we will get.
It is the Brexit we deserve.
It is the only Brexit that will lead to order from this chaos.

The order will be I the form of a total reformation of our system of political representation.
Leftys should welcome that....

If they really knew what left wing politics was truly about.......Envy of the rich is a nihilistic self defeating ideology and has failed many times throughout history.....Only the truest of morons based their political stance on that failed ideologue.

How's the weather?
Too hot here !


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 8, 2019, 7:05 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 614
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Selective polling LOL!

Hereís 116 polls for you.

http://www.no2brexit.com/polls.htm

Enjoy.


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 8, 2019, 7:27 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 603
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The whole sorry mess that is Brexit may yet be taken out of Parliaments hands if reports coming out of France are to be believed....

"There will be no extension to Brexit in the current circumstances",

according to the France's Foreign Minister.

Jean-Yves Le Drian said on Sunday that as things stand, a delay beyond the October 31 deadline would not be granted.

Asked if a Brexit delay was possible, the French minister told Europe 1 radio not under the current conditions.

"We are not going to do [extend] this every three months," he added..........

Suits me Cool


And which presumably means we'll hear less from Brexiters about the EU desperately hanging on to us for our monetary contribution.

.


Richard Rundle
Man City Transfer Target!

Sep 8, 2019, 7:33 PM

Posts: 8469
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 599
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The only 'opinon'.....The only 'statistic'.....The only 'poll' that matters is the one expressed by the UK electorate in 2016.


In a parliamentary democracy, the only "polls" that matter are those taken in parliament.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 8, 2019, 8:02 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 586
     Re: [Richard Rundle] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Another view of yesterdayís pro-Brexit yobs.

They behave remarkably like the yobs who follow the England football team around the world.

https://twitter.com/...421368002895877?s=21


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 8, 2019, 8:27 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 574
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The Boris Bounce appears to be of the dead cat Variety.
New ComRes Poll - 4-6 September 2019

LAB- 28% (+1)
CON 26% (-5)
LDEM 20% (+4)
BREXIT 17% (+1)
SNP/PC 4% (+1)
GREENS - 4%

Just wait until polling after 31 October.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 8, 2019, 11:58 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 520
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Another view of yesterdayís pro-Brexit yobs.

They behave remarkably like the yobs who follow the England football team around the world.

https://twitter.com/...421368002895877?s=21

Please explain exactly how half a dozen pushers and shovers ( who may have been police agent provocateurs....hmmm!) have any relevance to the result to
leave the EU as proscribed by the 2016 referendum....


Looking forward to this answer...LOL!


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 9, 2019, 7:17 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 484
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The Boris Bounce appears to be of the dead cat Variety.
New ComRes Poll - 4-6 September 2019

LAB- 28% (+1)
CON 26% (-5)
LDEM 20% (+4)
BREXIT 17% (+1)
SNP/PC 4% (+1)
GREENS - 4%

Just wait until polling after 31 October.


Interesting you pick that one. How about YouGov (5-6 Sept);
Conservative 35%
Labour 21%
Lib Dem 19%
Brexit 15%
Green 4%
SNP 4%

I could pick another half a dozen polls all with different numbers.

The only ones that count are those on election day, but they donít ever support the Remain case!


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 9, 2019, 9:46 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 1326
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Another view of yesterdayís pro-Brexit yobs.

They behave remarkably like the yobs who follow the England football team around the world.

https://twitter.com/...421368002895877?s=21

Please explain exactly how half a dozen pushers and shovers ( who may have been police agent provocateurs....hmmm!) have any relevance to the result to
leave the EU as proscribed by the 2016 referendum....


Looking forward to this answer...LOL!


Actually meant prescribed, not proscribed but point remains that the actions of half a dozen numpties in 2019 is irrelevant to the result of the referendum of 2016......unless someone can explain otherwise !


coops
First Team Sub

Sep 11, 2019, 10:09 AM

Posts: 1176
Location: Black Country
Team(s): Tamworth


Views: 1173
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Yes but at least we will be free, able to take control of our borders, Make our own laws and get rid of all those unelected bureaucrats LaughLaugh


Unelected bureaucrats like Dominic Cummings who is basically running the government at the moment?


Tykeoldboy
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 11, 2019, 1:47 PM

Posts: 3268
Location:
Team(s): Doncaster Rovers, Everton, Mablethorpe


Views: 1114
     Re: [coops] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

Yes but at least we will be free, able to take control of our borders, Make our own laws and get rid of all those unelected bureaucrats LaughLaugh


Unelected bureaucrats like Dominic Cummings who is basically running the government at the moment?


The business of running the country continues whether or not there is a government and that job is the responsibility of Mark Sedwill who is the head of the Civil Service, but not a politician.



The feeling of utter devastation when you pick up your mug and realise you already finished your tea.


Part-Timer
Chelsea Transfer Target

Sep 11, 2019, 1:56 PM

Posts: 4526
Location: Huntingdonshire
Team(s): Brentford, Bradford City, Peterborough United, Yaxley


Views: 1108
     Re: [Tykeoldboy] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

Yes but at least we will be free, able to take control of our borders, Make our own laws and get rid of all those unelected bureaucrats LaughLaugh


Unelected bureaucrats like Dominic Cummings who is basically running the government at the moment?


The business of running the country continues whether or not there is a government and that job is the responsibility of Mark Sedwill who is the head of the Civil Service, but not a politician.

It's parliament that has been prorogued not government. Ministers will still be working as hard as ever in their departments.


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 11, 2019, 3:41 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 1072
     Re: [Part-Timer] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Ministers will still be working as hard as ever in their departments.


In theory, it's great for Ministers to be hard at work in their Departments.

Unfortunately, if you're talking of the Chris Graylings of this world, you'd rather they lazed around chilling and doing nothing rather than busily spreading disaster with all they touch. Frown

.


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 11, 2019, 4:17 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 1054
     Re: [Tykeoldboy] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

Yes but at least we will be free, able to take control of our borders, Make our own laws and get rid of all those unelected bureaucrats LaughLaugh


Unelected bureaucrats like Dominic Cummings who is basically running the government at the moment?


The business of running the country continues whether or not there is a government and that job is the responsibility of Mark Sedwill who is the head of the Civil Service, but not a politician.


I suppose the argument is that Dominic Cummings is some sort of supercharged Alastair Campbell/Malcolm Tucker hatchet man pulling Boris' strings and running the show. Personally, I'm not convinced that is actually the case. Any Minister with a bit of backbone and self respect can take the Jo Johnson/Amber Rudd option and walk out if they disagree with the way the ship is being steered, irrespective of who's doing the steering.

I'm also not convinced that Cummings is a tactical and strategic genius.

For instance, I don't understand what they expected to gain from the decision to prorogue.

The opponents of No Deal are deeply split between Remainers and those MPs willing to Brexit but not without a Deal. This split has been one reason why the Commons has found it so difficult to find a majority for any course of action. I would have expected an unprorogued Commons to have remained the ineffective talking shop that it has been for months and months.

However, the decision to prorogue has managed the difficult feat of uniting the various anti No Deal factions and resulted in the run of defeats Boris has suffered.

Proroguing Parliament looks like a Baldrick cunning plan that in reality is both a conspiracy and a cock-up.

.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 11, 2019, 4:51 PM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 1041
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

For instance, I don't understand what they expected to gain from the decision to prorogue.

The opponents of No Deal are deeply split between Remainers and those MPs willing to Brexit but not without a Deal. This split has been one reason why the Commons has found it so difficult to find a majority for any course of action. I would have expected an unprorogued Commons to have remained the ineffective talking shop that it has been for months and months.

However, the decision to prorogue has managed the difficult feat of uniting the various anti No Deal factions and resulted in the run of defeats Boris has suffered.

Proroguing Parliament looks like a Baldrick cunning plan that in reality is both a conspiracy and a cock-up.

.


Agree. It was perfectly possible to predict the fallout by also leaving the Remainers time to do exactly what they did last week.

Had he suggested a General Election first off, he wouldnít have píeed off 20-odd members of his parliamentary party and given the momentum to Remain.

However, if he can cling on until the eventual General Election I feel certain heíll win a majority.


leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 12, 2019, 6:59 AM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 948
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

https://bylinetimes.com/...nsons-leave-backers/



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



northstandexile
First Team Regular

Sep 12, 2019, 5:25 PM

Posts: 1413
Location: Mansfield
Team(s): Mansfield Town


Views: 879
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Does it really matter if you tell porkies to the Queen?


Tykeoldboy
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 12, 2019, 6:05 PM

Posts: 3268
Location:
Team(s): Doncaster Rovers, Everton, Mablethorpe


Views: 859
     Re: [northstandexile] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Does it really matter if you tell porkies to the Queen?


I'm not sure if the reigning UK monarch is still allowed to have someone taken to the gallows to be hung drawn and quartered just because they have been insulted or lied to.



The feeling of utter devastation when you pick up your mug and realise you already finished your tea.

(This post was edited by Tykeoldboy on Sep 12, 2019, 6:06 PM)


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 12, 2019, 6:46 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 843
     Re: [Tykeoldboy] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Nobody accused Johnson of lying last week when an English court found in his favour. I wonder why that judgement has had rather less publicity...


Sale Holmfield
First Team Regular

Sep 12, 2019, 6:59 PM

Posts: 1394
Location: Sale
Team(s): Altrincham, Conwy Borough


Views: 829
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Nobody accused Johnson of lying last week when an English court found in his favour. I wonder why that judgement has had rather less publicity...

Probably because, naive as we are, most people expect a government to act within the law, so it is much more worthy of note when one has not.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 12, 2019, 7:00 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 829
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Nobody accused Johnson of lying last week when an English court found in his favour. I wonder why that judgement has had rather less publicity...


It had plenty of publicity. Perhaps you werenít paying attention.

However, Gina Millerís case was not that Johnson had lied but that prorogation was an abuse of power, The Scottish court concluded that Johnson had not told the queen his true reason for prorogation. Quite different. He isnít being accused, by the way. The Scottish Court of Session has concluded he DID lie.

As an aside, its interesting reading the English reaction to the Scottish court case. Most people seem to think that English law is UK law and the Scottish judgment is a bit of a side show.

Lots of people are saying that because the English court found against the appellants the Supreme Court will do the same. They even think itís an English court.

The truth is, Scots Law and English Law are equals. The UK Supreme Court, with Scottish and English judges on it must consider the Scottish verdict in line with Scots law.

What the English court decided is an irrelevance.


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 12, 2019, 7:02 PM)


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 12, 2019, 7:20 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 814
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

It got far less publicity and generated far less comment from certain quarters because the judgement did not go against the government. It is as simple as that.

And I know perfectly well that the cases were not about 'lying'. These accusations came from politicians and the media.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 12, 2019, 8:25 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 772
     Re: [Sale Holmfield] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Nobody accused Johnson of lying last week when an English court found in his favour. I wonder why that judgement has had rather less publicity...

Probably because, naive as we are, most people expect a government to act within the law, so it is much more worthy of note when one has not.

But what law? There is no statute, only precedent. The English court's judgement was that it is not the courts' business to judge.


Ronsdog
First Team Star


Sep 12, 2019, 8:25 PM

Posts: 2669
Location: Sarf London
Team(s): Lowestoft Town, Crystal Palace


Views: 772
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To


Perhaps not as clear cut as reported......

https://fullfact.org/...omy/short-positions/

.......and wasn't it the bankroller of the remain campaign , one George Soros, that made over £100m from betting against the £ during the ERM fiasco?

We all enjoy a punt so what was your point Leo?


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 12, 2019, 8:26 PM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 768
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The Supreme Court will find in the Governments favour; and this week will prove to be something of an unnecessary side show.

Itís at least given the Remoaners something to crow on about, given they never get to celebrate actual election victories.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 12, 2019, 8:27 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 766
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Nobody accused Johnson of lying last week when an English court found in his favour. I wonder why that judgement has had rather less publicity...


It had plenty of publicity. Perhaps you werenít paying attention.

However, Gina Millerís case was not that Johnson had lied but that prorogation was an abuse of power, The Scottish court concluded that Johnson had not told the queen his true reason for prorogation. Quite different. He isnít being accused, by the way. The Scottish Court of Session has concluded he DID lie.

As an aside, its interesting reading the English reaction to the Scottish court case. Most people seem to think that English law is UK law and the Scottish judgment is a bit of a side show.

Lots of people are saying that because the English court found against the appellants the Supreme Court will do the same. They even think itís an English court.

The truth is, Scots Law and English Law are equals. The UK Supreme Court, with Scottish and English judges on it must consider the Scottish verdict in line with Scots law.

What the English court decided is an irrelevance.


I haven't had time to get fully up to speed but I understand that the Scottish Judges were obliged to draw this conclusion because the UK Gov't didn't offer any evidence to the contrary or alternative explanatuion to the charge of lying laid before them.

Because they are Judges and NOT investigators, if there was NO evidence presented by the defence to the contrary they are obliged to judge that as the charges are uncontested the only conclusion they can draw is that they must be true.

It's not the same as them being factually true, just evidentially true.

It's why there will be an appeal, the Gov't will present it's side and the case will fail in the Supreme Court due to the impossibility of proving the lie.

This is how I understand it with what I've read.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 12, 2019, 8:29 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 762
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Multiply the Soros windfall by 10...


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 12, 2019, 9:07 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 725
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
Nobody accused Johnson of lying last week when an English court found in his favour. I wonder why that judgement has had rather less publicity...


It had plenty of publicity. Perhaps you werenít paying attention.

However, Gina Millerís case was not that Johnson had lied but that prorogation was an abuse of power, The Scottish court concluded that Johnson had not told the queen his true reason for prorogation. Quite different. He isnít being accused, by the way. The Scottish Court of Session has concluded he DID lie.

As an aside, its interesting reading the English reaction to the Scottish court case. Most people seem to think that English law is UK law and the Scottish judgment is a bit of a side show.

Lots of people are saying that because the English court found against the appellants the Supreme Court will do the same. They even think itís an English court.

The truth is, Scots Law and English Law are equals. The UK Supreme Court, with Scottish and English judges on it must consider the Scottish verdict in line with Scots law.

What the English court decided is an irrelevance.


I haven't had time to get fully up to speed but I understand that the Scottish Judges were obliged to draw this conclusion because the UK Gov't didn't offer any evidence to the contrary or alternative explanatuion to the charge of lying laid before them.

Because they are Judges and NOT investigators, if there was NO evidence presented by the defence to the contrary they are obliged to judge that as the charges are uncontested the only conclusion they can draw is that they must be true.

It's not the same as them being factually true, just evidentially true.

It's why there will be an appeal, the Gov't will present it's side and the case will fail in the Supreme Court due to the impossibility of proving the lie.

This is how I understand it with what I've read.


Iím afraid you cannot present new evidence at the Supreme Court.

The role of the Supreme Court is to examine the verdict based on the evidence at the time of the case. It is not a retrial. Johnson has had hisbopportunity to present his evidence.

Johnson was requested by the court to submit a sworn affadavit explaining his actions. He failed to do so. No civil servant was willing to swear to anything either.

It seems to me clear that the Court of Session was right to deduce from this that Johnson and his civil servants were unwilling to perjure themselves and that consequently he did lie about his motives.


Ronsdog
First Team Star


Sep 12, 2019, 9:30 PM

Posts: 2669
Location: Sarf London
Team(s): Lowestoft Town, Crystal Palace


Views: 702
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Multiply the Soros windfall by 10...


Thanks for pointing out my error.

I think the point is well and truly madeWink


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 12, 2019, 10:28 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 674
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
Nobody accused Johnson of lying last week when an English court found in his favour. I wonder why that judgement has had rather less publicity...


It had plenty of publicity. Perhaps you werenít paying attention.

However, Gina Millerís case was not that Johnson had lied but that prorogation was an abuse of power, The Scottish court concluded that Johnson had not told the queen his true reason for prorogation. Quite different. He isnít being accused, by the way. The Scottish Court of Session has concluded he DID lie.

As an aside, its interesting reading the English reaction to the Scottish court case. Most people seem to think that English law is UK law and the Scottish judgment is a bit of a side show.

Lots of people are saying that because the English court found against the appellants the Supreme Court will do the same. They even think itís an English court.

The truth is, Scots Law and English Law are equals. The UK Supreme Court, with Scottish and English judges on it must consider the Scottish verdict in line with Scots law.

What the English court decided is an irrelevance.


I haven't had time to get fully up to speed but I understand that the Scottish Judges were obliged to draw this conclusion because the UK Gov't didn't offer any evidence to the contrary or alternative explanatuion to the charge of lying laid before them.

Because they are Judges and NOT investigators, if there was NO evidence presented by the defence to the contrary they are obliged to judge that as the charges are uncontested the only conclusion they can draw is that they must be true.

It's not the same as them being factually true, just evidentially true.

It's why there will be an appeal, the Gov't will present it's side and the case will fail in the Supreme Court due to the impossibility of proving the lie.

This is how I understand it with what I've read.


Iím afraid you cannot present new evidence at the Supreme Court.

The role of the Supreme Court is to examine the verdict based on the evidence at the time of the case. It is not a retrial. Johnson has had hisbopportunity to present his evidence.

Johnson was requested by the court to submit a sworn affadavit explaining his actions. He failed to do so. No civil servant was willing to swear to anything either.

It seems to me clear that the Court of Session was right to deduce from this that Johnson and his civil servants were unwilling to perjure themselves and that consequently he did lie about his motives.


The Supreme Court is essentially an appeal court and as such new evidence can be presented if presented for the Judges' consideration at the start of proceedings.
It has to meet certain criteria and generally ( though NOT exclusively) has to be something that could not have been presented at the original trial.
In a case of this importance it is my contention that the judges would be sympathetic to new evidence being presented.

It was a big mistake of Johnson's not to properly engage with the Scottish trial.

In general, I think Judges have to be careful not to be political and to not get involved in matters that are better dealt with at the ballot box.


TroubleAtMill
Reserve Team Sub

Sep 13, 2019, 7:12 AM

Posts: 427
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 613
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

This man in the question time audience sums it up perfectly https://mobile.twitter.com/.../1172274896711442434


Part-Timer
Chelsea Transfer Target

Sep 13, 2019, 4:34 PM

Posts: 4526
Location: Huntingdonshire
Team(s): Brentford, Bradford City, Peterborough United, Yaxley


Views: 517
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Appealing to the courts in this instance seems a little desperate to me. The convention is that the Prime Minister advises the monarch when to prorogue Parliament. There is no law that the PM has to make a reasonable case when doing so. The monarch is just a rubber stamp. The monarch may ask why and may even counsel against it but that is as far as it should go. There should be no veto and so whether the PM has given honest reasons is neither here nor there. Much as I deplore this prorogation it is right that the decision is made by an elected PM (and, yes, there are issues around that in Boris Johnson's case but he holds that position as a result of a recognised process with plenty of precedents) and not an individual in an inherited role.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 13, 2019, 5:46 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 493
     Re: [Part-Timer] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

A rare intelligent analysis of the Court of Sessions judgment by our media.

https://threadreaderapp.com/...252249667592193.html


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 15, 2019, 12:07 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 2069
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
A rare intelligent analysis of the Court of Sessions judgment by our media.

https://threadreaderapp.com/...252249667592193.html


The undeniable conclusion is that the court simply wishes to continue the tradition of 'rebel Scots' more than anything else.
It basically says the prorogation is legal but thinks it might be able to claim illegality on the basis of what might have been hidden in the PM's mind, even though that is beyond its remit!
It knows the Supreme Court will dismiss it biit the Scottish Court can at least retain a sense of solidarity with its fellow Nationals with its anti-Westminster ruling.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 15, 2019, 7:41 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 2042
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

LOL!


northstandexile
First Team Regular

Sep 16, 2019, 12:47 PM

Posts: 1413
Location: Mansfield
Team(s): Mansfield Town


Views: 1839
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I think one of the big issues is that in a normal conference recess, the parliament has a possible of cancelling the recess to discuss important matters if the parliament agrees. Whereas in this situation parliament has no say in recalling parliament .

That is why a five week closure is not right.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 16, 2019, 12:56 PM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 1829
     Re: [northstandexile] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Quite honestly the only point of recalling Parliament early is to vote for a general election.

The MPís have got themselves into a position where they will vote for anything to defeat the Government, but simply refuse to bring the Government down.

In this situation we can have another five weeks of bluster, random and pointless votes and still be no better off.

Simply nothing of value is going to be done in Parliament now, until Boris comes back from the EU summit. Then weíll know if heís got a deal (that will be voted down by Parliament) or no deal.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 16, 2019, 4:35 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 1773
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Quite honestly the only point of recalling Parliament early is to vote for a general election.

The MPís have got themselves into a position where they will vote for anything to defeat the Government, but simply refuse to bring the Government down.


What they have refused to do is call a GE on Johnsonís terms.

The GE will happen after 31 Oct on their terms when, hopefully, there has been no deal and Art. 50 will have to berevoked or an extension sought.

The Tories will be toast.


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 17, 2019, 3:24 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 1615
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
A rare intelligent analysis of the Court of Sessions judgment by our media.

https://threadreaderapp.com/...252249667592193.html


The undeniable conclusion is that the court simply wishes to continue the tradition of 'rebel Scots' more than anything else.
It basically says the prorogation is legal but thinks it might be able to claim illegality on the basis of what might have been hidden in the PM's mind, even though that is beyond its remit!
It knows the Supreme Court will dismiss it biit the Scottish Court can at least retain a sense of solidarity with its fellow Nationals with its anti-Westminster ruling.


I think it's rather more a case of the English Courts seemingly unwilling to look at the reasons for prorogation whilst the Scots Courts consider that the reasons are relevant in order to prevent arbitrary abuse of power by the executive.

I'd expect the Supreme Court to be as reluctant as the English lower court in getting involved in the politics of the prorogation and therefore rule that the prorogation was lawful. But given the mess of recent years, I don't think our unwritten constitution is any longer the envy of anywhere else in the world.

Watching the TV coverage of the case in the Supreme Court this morning I was quite impressed by the discussions.

This afternoon I tried to watch a bit more and found that BBC2, BBC News Channel and BBC Parliament Channel were all covering Jo Swinson's speech from the Bournemouth Conference. Even though I'm a Lib Dem I don't find her speeches thrilling, so three channel coverage was a bit over the top!

.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 17, 2019, 6:29 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 1574
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
A rare intelligent analysis of the Court of Sessions judgment by our media.

https://threadreaderapp.com/...252249667592193.html


The undeniable conclusion is that the court simply wishes to continue the tradition of 'rebel Scots' more than anything else.
It basically says the prorogation is legal but thinks it might be able to claim illegality on the basis of what might have been hidden in the PM's mind, even though that is beyond its remit!
It knows the Supreme Court will dismiss it biit the Scottish Court can at least retain a sense of solidarity with its fellow Nationals with its anti-Westminster ruling.


I think it's rather more a case of the English Courts seemingly unwilling to look at the reasons for prorogation whilst the Scots Courts consider that the reasons are relevant in order to prevent arbitrary abuse of power by the executive.

I'd expect the Supreme Court to be as reluctant as the English lower court in getting involved in the politics of the prorogation and therefore rule that the prorogation was lawful. But given the mess of recent years, I don't think our unwritten constitution is any longer the envy of anywhere else in the world.

Watching the TV coverage of the case in the Supreme Court this morning I was quite impressed by the discussions.

This afternoon I tried to watch a bit more and found that BBC2, BBC News Channel and BBC Parliament Channel were all covering Jo Swinson's speech from the Bournemouth Conference. Even though I'm a Lib Dem I don't find her speeches thrilling, so three channel coverage was a bit over the top!

.



Well, politics is politics and Law is Law,

The Law need not rule on politics and as prorogation is a normal and legal action any reason for proroguing Parliament would be political therefore outside the concerns of the court, I would think.

I accept the Scottish Courts have a slightly different take on these issues.

Let's not forget the PM hasn't even done his Queen's Speech yet, which
every new PM has to do.

Parliament had 3 years to discuss Brexit. It's not going to hurt it to have a few weeks off.
It's given Swinson a chance to position herself fully against Labour and now there is really nowhere for Labour Remainers to go than over to the Lib Dems.

Next PM? a tad optimistic methinks but possibly 2nd largest share of the vote after Boris.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 17, 2019, 7:21 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 1557
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Next PM? a tad optimistic methinks but possibly 2nd largest share of the vote after Boris.


The chsnces of Johnson being PM at the next GE are pretty slim.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 18, 2019, 2:18 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 1422
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Watching a bit of the Gov't appeal proceedings at the Supreme Court.

A bit tedious listening to the usual Exclusivist tropes from the SNP's lawyer whilst he attempts to lecture the court on its role and pleading for special treatment for the Scottish case.............embarrassing!!


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 18, 2019, 9:24 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 1339
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I reckon that Johnson & Cummings decided to follow the David Davis game plan and aimed to run down the clock on the negotiations in the belief that they would pressure the EU to offer concessions as the 31 October 2019 deadline approached. Part of the plan appears to be avoiding detailing the UK's revised Ireland/UK border proposals until well into October.

Davis always said that a Deal would be struck at the eleventh hour because the EU would hold out to that point.

However, it's not just Johnson and the UK that can set deadlines.

https://www.theguardian.com/...border-checks-brexit

.


Ronsdog
First Team Star


Sep 20, 2019, 12:54 AM

Posts: 2669
Location: Sarf London
Team(s): Lowestoft Town, Crystal Palace


Views: 1181
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I reckon that Johnson & Cummings decided to follow the David Davis game plan and aimed to run down the clock on the negotiations in the belief that they would pressure the EU to offer concessions as the 31 October 2019 deadline approached. Part of the plan appears to be avoiding detailing the UK's revised Ireland/UK border proposals until well into October.

Davis always said that a Deal would be struck at the eleventh hour because the EU would hold out to that point.

However, it's not just Johnson and the UK that can set deadlines.

https://www.theguardian.com/...border-checks-brexit

.


Encouraging noises coming out of Brussels regarding the lodging of 'non-papers' by the British negotiating team.

Probably including theses proposals https://www.prosperity-uk.com/aacabout/
First posted 23/08 , page 167 previous thread.

It has also been pointed out in no uncertain terms that 40% of Irish exports go through Dover!
The pressure is on Varadker now and he could still find himself squeezed by both negotiating parties.


(This post was edited by Ronsdog on Sep 20, 2019, 12:56 AM)


Ronsdog
First Team Star


Sep 20, 2019, 1:36 PM

Posts: 2669
Location: Sarf London
Team(s): Lowestoft Town, Crystal Palace


Views: 1071
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

 
https://news.sky.com/...ill-happen-11814207#

With the spectre of a No Deal looming it appears that the EU have finally softened their negotiating stance.

Just goes to show what a Leaver PM can achieve......Cool


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 20, 2019, 2:48 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 1047
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
https://news.sky.com/...ill-happen-11814207#

With the spectre of a No Deal looming it appears that the EU have finally softened their negotiating stance.

Just goes to show what a Leaver PM can achieve......Cool


Imagine how much better it would have been had we had had a Leaver PM and a positive, co-operative EU right from the start.

Imagine how much easier it could have been had the Remoaners accepted their responsibilities as defined within the Democratic Contract.

Imagine all the people, Living life in Peace.

What a dreamer I am !


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 20, 2019, 4:23 PM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 1020
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
https://news.sky.com/...ill-happen-11814207#

With the spectre of a No Deal looming it appears that the EU have finally softened their negotiating stance.

Just goes to show what a Leaver PM can achieve......Cool


Of course, weíll still end up with no-deal because Corbyn will vote against any deal the Tories negotiate, but at least the country can blame Labour for that.

That should just about wipe out the last remaining Labour votes at the General Election.


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 20, 2019, 5:00 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 1005
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

If there is a genuine report from the government stating what benefits there are to Brexit i'd like to see it.! We'd all like to see it.!

The fact is reports showing benefits of Brexit do not exist. The only ones that do are damning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Yellowhammer

Gove tried to lie about how this is 'worst case planning' But it isn't, because he has another set of documents for that. And detailed within are the likely scenario in the aftermath of our own bad choices. This does't even cover the long term impact which arch brexiteer Jacob Reese-Mogg stated would take generations to recover from. IF you truly beleive there is evidence that this will go well, find it and post it here. (Even Farage doesn't predict a good outcome. All he ever says is "opportunity" "Get away from" He can never say where, or when, or how much, because there is no scenario where there is a positive)



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 20, 2019, 6:38 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 977
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

EU rejects Boris Johnson request for Brexit deal without Irish backstop

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-deal-irish-backstop-border-boris-johnson-eu-barnier-stephen-barclay-a9113451.html



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 20, 2019, 9:54 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 940
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
https://news.sky.com/...ill-happen-11814207#

With the spectre of a No Deal looming it appears that the EU have finally softened their negotiating stance.

Just goes to show what a Leaver PM can achieve......Cool


Of course, weíll still end up with no-deal because Corbyn will vote against any deal the Tories negotiate, but at least the country can blame Labour for that.

That should just about wipe out the last remaining Labour votes at the General Election.


Corbyn doesn't have a majority in the Commons.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 21, 2019, 11:45 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 873
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

If anyone was left in doubt before the Labour Party Conference, they surely arenít now; The Labour Party arenít fit to govern themselves, never mind the country.

All momentum (pun intended) lost, all messages drowned out by the attempt to sack Tom Watson.

Some credit to Corbyn, who had recognised the devastating impact of removing a democratically elected deputy, but too late to make the Conference about anything other than internal disputes.

What this country needs is a viable, strong opposition.

What we have is Momentum-led Labour Party.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 21, 2019, 12:05 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 870
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
If anyone was left in doubt before the Labour Party Conference, they surely arenít now; The Labour Party arenít fit to govern themselves, never mind the country.

All momentum (pun intended) lost, all messages drowned out by the attempt to sack Tom Watson.

Some credit to Corbyn, who had recognised the devastating impact of removing a democratically elected deputy, but too late to make the Conference about anything other than internal disputes.

What this country needs is a viable, strong opposition.

What we have is Momentum-led Labour Party.


Meanwhile 23 of the most respected Tory MPs walk out on Boris Johnson/Dominic Cummings' extremist Tory party.


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 21, 2019, 5:52 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 841
     Re: [Ronsdog] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
https://news.sky.com/...ill-happen-11814207#

With the spectre of a No Deal looming it appears that the EU have finally softened their negotiating stance.

Just goes to show what a Leaver PM can achieve......Cool


Both the EU and the UK desperately want a deal and to move on to the next stage of the negotiations.

They might try to tweak May's deal and pretend significant movement had taken place but maybe the crucial concession would take place in Belfast.

https://www.theguardian.com/...it-deal-brussels-dup

And if Johnson does achieve a Deal by 31 October the upcoming General Election could be extremely painful for the opposition parties.

As Simon Jenkins puts it:

"His one need is to deliver formal Brexit on target. It would leave both Labour and the Liberal Democrats, now pledged to various forms of remain, up the electoral creek without a paddle."

.


Part-Timer
Chelsea Transfer Target

Sep 24, 2019, 10:24 AM

Posts: 4526
Location: Huntingdonshire
Team(s): Brentford, Bradford City, Peterborough United, Yaxley


Views: 436
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
If there is a genuine report from the government stating what benefits there are to Brexit i'd like to see it.! We'd all like to see it.!

The fact is reports showing benefits of Brexit do not exist. The only ones that do are damning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Yellowhammer

Gove tried to lie about how this is 'worst case planning' But it isn't, because he has another set of documents for that. And detailed within are the likely scenario in the aftermath of our own bad choices. This does't even cover the long term impact which arch brexiteer Jacob Reese-Mogg stated would take generations to recover from. IF you truly beleive there is evidence that this will go well, find it and post it here. (Even Farage doesn't predict a good outcome. All he ever says is "opportunity" "Get away from" He can never say where, or when, or how much, because there is no scenario where there is a positive)

Don't be such a pessimist. Ann Widdecombe has told us that Brexit won't be as bad as Word War Two. Surely that's enough encouragement for anyone to leave.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 11:08 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 422
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

The undeniable conclusion is that the court simply wishes to continue the tradition of 'rebel Scots' more than anything else.
It basically says the prorogation is legal but thinks it might be able to claim illegality on the basis of what might have been hidden in the PM's mind, even though that is beyond its remit!
It knows the Supreme Court will dismiss it biit the Scottish Court can at least retain a sense of solidarity with its fellow Nationals with its anti-Westminster ruling.


11-0

LOL!


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 24, 2019, 11:43 AM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 12:01 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 384
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

"If you have any information on this pair, who cruelly deceived a 93-year-old lady, do please contact Westminster police station."




Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 24, 2019, 12:18 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 374
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Maybe Boris and his Brexit followers can get a retrial until they get the verdict they want!
I would be happy with that, say if in 3 years time more information and evidence came to light.



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 12:21 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 369
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Maybe Boris and his Brexit followers can get a retrial until they get the verdict they want!


Is there no European Court they can appeal to?


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 1:30 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 524
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Maybe Boris and his Brexit followers can get a retrial until they get the verdict they want!


Is there no European Court they can appeal to?


No because this is British Law.

Doesn't make a lot of difference re: Leaving the EU.

Boris can appeal .........to the electorate via an election, or he can prorogue parliament.....again!

Prorogation gets my vote!


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 2:06 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 488
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

We have now entered very dangerous territory when unelected and unaccountable individuals override government decisions (and, therefore, the decisions of the people).

Lords Reed and Carnwarth sat today. They were two of three dissenting judges in the Miller case in 2017 (the third, Lord Hughes, has since retired). Then, Reed said it was not the business of the courts to interfere in the business of parliament. I wonder why he thinks differently now?


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 2:10 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 486
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
We have now entered very dangerous territory when unelected and unaccountable individuals override government decisions (and, therefore, the decisions of the people).


LOL!!!!!!!!!

(you were joking, weren't you?)


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 2:19 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 479
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

No.

Does your vocabulary extend beyond LOL?


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 2:49 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 466
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Not when I'm laughing out loud. And to be fair there are a lot of LOL moments from Brexiteers on this thread.

Your complaint about our judiciary being unelected is deliciously Trumpian.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 3:31 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 430
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Why is it funny? It's deadly serious. Their being unelected doesn't matter until they interfere in the proceedings of Parliament. The English High Court knew its place. The Supreme Court apparently thinks itself better.


Blanc Mange
Youth Team Regular

Sep 24, 2019, 3:33 PM

Posts: 201
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 426
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

So if the result had gone the other way i'd wager you wouldn't be so magnanimous about it,fists pumping at the TV screen,veins bulging out your eyes whilst contemplating what to type next[;)....so parliament returns to do what exactly????? (thinks for a nanosecond) so here's some highlights so we don't have to watch it'

1.The majority of the house will be doing their let's not agree to a deal routine.
2.Boris will waffle on without really saying anything.
3.Jeremy will ask Boris to resign.
4.Liblabtor will become the new 3rd main party (bye bye SNP).
5.Ian Blackford will ask a question that takes a hour to ask (and we all know which question that will be)
6.Jeremy will ask Boris to resign.
7.Boris will be doing his lets have a general election spiel.
8.Jo Swinson tells the house that the referendum didn't reallly happen and wonders what all the fuss is all about.
9.Boris then tells everybody that WE WILL LEAVE ON THE 31ST OF OCTOBER just in case nobody knew!
10.Jeremy will ask Boris to resign (it's the new labour brexit policy)
11.Boris then asks why Jeremy is such a scaredy cat and not wanting a general election.
12.Emily Thornberry swivels her eyes and Dawn Butler shakes her head till its explodes at the shocking and unwarranted question.

As Madonna once sang 'Strike a pose there's nothing to it
Prorogue'


(This post was edited by Blanc Mange on Sep 24, 2019, 3:46 PM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 4:26 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 390
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Why is it funny? It's deadly serious. Their being unelected doesn't matter until they interfere in the proceedings of Parliament. The English High Court knew its place. The Supreme Court apparently thinks itself better.


Their only interference is to stand up for the rights of our democratically elected parliament against the whims of our unelected executive. When chancersl ike Johnson and Cummings conspire to ride roughshod over our parliament to prevent parliament from representing us, with no other reason than to stymie scrutiny and debate , we have a right to seek redress in the law.

Johnson and Cummings are not above the law.

Just consider some of the Supreme Court's judgement:

"Parliament can make laws which everyone must obey: this would be undermined if the executive could, through the use of the prerogative, prevent Parliament from exercising its power to make laws for as long as it pleased. "

"ďthe conduct of government by a Prime Minister and Cabinet collectively responsible and accountable to Parliament lies at the heart of Westminster democracyĒ. The power to prorogue is limited by the constitutional principles with which it would otherwise conflict."

"a decision to prorogue (or advise the monarch to prorogue) will be unlawful if the prorogation has the effect of frustrating or preventing, without reasonable justification, the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions as a legislature and as the body responsible for the supervision of the executive. "
"The Court is bound to conclude, therefore, that the decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification."


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 4:37 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 383
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The whole laughable irony of all this, of course , is that until today Brexiteers, from Johnson down, were telling us prorogation was absolutely nothing to do with Brexit.

Now they have been rumbled by the highest court in the land and they bleat that declaring Johnson's con trick illegal is an attempt to stop Brexit.

LOL!

Thank goodness for those brave people in and out of parliament who have stood up to Johnson and Cummings.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 5:15 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 366
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The people are sovereign, not Parliament in the way that some think i.e. that it can dictate to the people, who voted explicitly to leave the EU in the referendum and implicitly in the 2017 general election. The Referendum Act and the Article 50 Act were passed by huge margins. The Repeal (Withdrawal) Act was passed by a comfortable margin (but not before parliament nobbled it) and yet Johnson is apparently 'riding roughshod' over parliament. That parliament has done everything it can to overthrow the 2016 result by subterfuge yet doesn't have the courage to call another GE. It has committed a coup against the people and the judges support it by calling it 'holding the executive accountable'.

Nevertheless, I agree with those who think Johnson was foolish to do this. He should have known the trouble it would bring. The word 'disingenuous' is used wrongly too often today but it was appropriately applied to Government arguments here just as it was to the hypocrites in the House who said they were respecting the referendum result but wanted to prevent 'no deal'. The argument that 'only 3-4 days business would be lost' is no more convincing than that of the Remain camp who said they needed the time to' hold the executive accountable'. There's been three years of 'holding the executive accountable' by trying to stop it enacting democratic decisions.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 5:34 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 355
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The people are sovereign, not Parliament in the way that some think i.e. that it can dictate to the people, who voted explicitly to leave the EU in the referendum and implicitly in the 2017 general election. The Referendum Act and the Article 50 Act were passed by huge margins. The Repeal (Withdrawal) Act was passed by a comfortable margin (but not before parliament nobbled it) and yet Johnson is apparently 'riding roughshod' over parliament. That parliament has done everything it can to overthrow the 2016 result by subterfuge yet doesn't have the courage to call another GE. It has committed a coup against the people and the judges support it by calling it 'holding the executive accountable'. .


Your first sentence simply isn't true.

Our Parliament is sovereign. We elect MPs to represent us in that parliament.

We are a representative democracy, not a populist one.

We entrust our representatives to do what they believe is best for us. In most cases they do that, but not when it comes to Brexit. Most Tory MPs campaigned against leaving the Eu because of the untold damage it will inflict on the UK ... but many of those same Tory MPs now campaign for Brexit because they fear for their seats and are wiliing to abrogate their responsibilities as MPs to keep their seats. Thanks goodness for the (ex-)Tory MPs of principle like Grieve, Soubry, Allen, Boles.

No sane person can want a No Deal Brexit which is what we will get on 31 OCtober if Johnson, Cummings and the lunatic Tory right get their way. Thankfully there remains a sane majority in Parliament.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 6:09 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 335
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

"We are a representative democracy, not a populist one."

Yes, under normal circumstances. Nobody would suggest for a minute that Parliament act on any or every suggestion from the people or that it should ask us for an answer to any or every question it might think of. In this matter, however, it asked us a simple, unambiguous question and we gave the answer on the basis of trust: that it would enact "what the people decided".

It has gone back on that promise on the spurious grounds that a WTO exit will 'cause untold damage to the UK'. This is pure speculation. You can no more predict that it will than I can predict that it won't. The forecasts of apocalypse are embarrassing and although it is fair to say that there might be some difficulties, most of these should have been headed off with long-term planning and will pass anyway with time. Leaving must mean a change in border and customs arrangements. That's what Parliament should have been discussing, not scurrying around in dark places to come up with schemes to delay our leaving or reverse the vote with bogus pleas of conscience.

Parliamentary sovereignty is national sovereignty. Parliament is ours. It is not entitled to act against us. It draws its power and legitimacy from us, not from itself and its own sense of being. It is correct to say that it is there to hold to account an over-mighty executive. It is not entitled to usurp the executive's power, as it has done.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 6:11 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 332
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
The people are sovereign, not Parliament in the way that some think i.e. that it can dictate to the people, who voted explicitly to leave the EU in the referendum and implicitly in the 2017 general election. The Referendum Act and the Article 50 Act were passed by huge margins. The Repeal (Withdrawal) Act was passed by a comfortable margin (but not before parliament nobbled it) and yet Johnson is apparently 'riding roughshod' over parliament. That parliament has done everything it can to overthrow the 2016 result by subterfuge yet doesn't have the courage to call another GE. It has committed a coup against the people and the judges support it by calling it 'holding the executive accountable'. .


Your first sentence simply isn't true.

Our Parliament is sovereign. We elect MPs to represent us in that parliament.

We are a representative democracy, not a populist one.

We entrust our representatives to do what they believe is best for us. In most cases they do that, but not when it comes to Brexit. Most Tory MPs campaigned against leaving the Eu because of the untold damage it will inflict on the UK ... but many of those same Tory MPs now campaign for Brexit because they fear for their seats and are wiliing to abrogate their responsibilities as MPs to keep their seats. Thanks goodness for the (ex-)Tory MPs of principle like Grieve, Soubry, Allen, Boles.

No sane person can want a No Deal Brexit which is what we will get on 31 OCtober if Johnson, Cummings and the lunatic Tory right get their way. Thankfully there remains a sane majority in Parliament.


We have a populist Parliament that has prorogued Democracy.

Parliament can sit tomorrow and nothing changes..........We are leaving the EU and all this does is continue the uncertainty.

Anyone who claims this country can't cope with leaving the EU is lying through their teeth and deliberately and disingenuously so.

Election Now...........The People vs The Remainer Establishment/Elite


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 6:12 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 329
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Lords Reed and Carnwarth sat today. They were two of three dissenting judges in the Miller case in 2017 (the third, Lord Hughes, has since retired). Then, Reed said it was not the business of the courts to interfere in the business of parliament. I wonder why he thinks differently now?


I think partly that may be because the Government lawyers made such a poor effort at putting the Government case.

The judges seemed to focus on the failure of those lawyers to even attempt to justify the decision to prorogue. i.e.

"No justification for taking action with such an extreme effect has been put before the court."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/...uk-politics-49810680

.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 6:19 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 325
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
It has gone back on that promise on the spurious grounds that a WTO exit will 'cause untold damage to the UK'. This is pure speculation. You can no more predict that it will than I can predict that it won't.


I can point to the opinion of countless experts. What can you point to to suggest otherwise?

(Yes, I know Brexiteers don't like experts)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 6:21 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 323
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Election Now...........The People vs The Remainer Establishment/Elite


That's what Johnson is pleading for.

The election will be after 31 October, when the damage from a No Deal Brexit has been avoided and Johnson and the Tories are toast.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 6:27 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 308
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Experts on what? The usual crowd who predicted financial meltdown would follow a 'No' vote?

It IS speculation, often based on absolute worst-case scenarios. These 'experts' would do better to offer their advice on measures to reduce risk in the immediate post-exit period.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 6:29 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 306
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I think partly that may be because the Government lawyers made such a poor effort at putting the Government case.

The judges seemed to focus on the failure of those lawyers to even attempt to justify the decision to prorogue. i.e.

"No justification for taking action with such an extreme effect has been put before the court."

.


It's not the lawyers' fault.

The Scottish Court of Session invited Johnson and his officialst o outline their reasons for prorogation. Answer came there none.

That there was no "case for the defence" was patently obvious. It was a ploy to stymie parliament and no one was willing to perjure themselves by pretending otherwise - not even Johnson.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 6:34 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 300
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

"I think partly that may be because the Government lawyers made such a poor effort at putting the Government case."

Probably because the case was weak, as I said elsewhere. Nevertheless, this is dangerous territory for judges. In 2017, Reed stressed the need for Parliament to hold the executive to account (no one should be questioning this) but he warned the judiciary to tread carefully.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 6:37 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 296
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Experts on what? The usual crowd who predicted financial meltdown would follow a 'No' vote?


https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/...the-impact-would-be/

https://ukandeu.ac.uk/...ion-Fact-sheet-1.pdf

https://www.nfuonline.com/...no-deal-and-the-wto/

https://www.bloomberg.com/...t-could-be-quicktake

But hey, just google "effects of WTO Brexit" and find out for yourself.

Sometimes I think Brexiteers live in a kind of LA-La-Land where the whole world is plotting against their vision of the sunny uplands of a No Deal Brexit, by presenting them with unfortunate facts.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 6:38 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 292
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Probably because the case was weak, as I said elsewhere. Nevertheless, this is dangerous territory for judges. In 2017, Reed stressed the need for Parliament to hold the executive to account (no one should be questioning this) but he warned the judiciary to tread carefully.


Do you think our executive is above the law?


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 6:57 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 281
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

So many forecasts are based on the idea that trade will continue for some considerable time in the future as it is behaving now i.e. that the nature of economy will not change, that people's buying habits will not change, that imports and exports will not vary etc. In other words, the calculations are based on a snapshot (as with HMG's annual budget). The real world's not like that. The economy will adjust.

Leavers understand there will be difficulties. They also know that they can be overcome but that that requires some positive will. Too many opposed to leaving seem to be wishing failure upon the nation.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 6:58 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 277
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

What law has been broken?


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 7:30 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 245
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
What law has been broken?


The Supreme Court concluded unanimously that Johnsonís attempt to silence Parliament was ďunlawfulĒ.

Take it up with the Supreme Court if you think his actions were lawful.


steve walker
Administrator


Sep 24, 2019, 7:34 PM

Posts: 1807
Location: Staffordshire
Team(s):


Views: 240
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
What law has been broken?



Did you read or more likely watch the judgement from the Supreme Court when it was read out?

It's about an abuse of power ie the decision to suspend Parliament for 5 weeks was unnecessary in the opinion of all 11 Justices and took away the ability of Parliament to scrutinise the Government, who incidentally are also not elected... we as voters have no say in who is in Government only who is in Parliament.

Those in Parliament should be able to ask questions of the Government as to what is going on at this most crucial of times. The Court are merely upholding that right and they outlined very clearly why they have the precedent to do so.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 7:37 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 422
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Ah, you're on form today! Shockingly rude as ever.

No statute has been broken but the SC has entered political territory. It's an important distinction.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 7:48 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 413
     Re: [steve walker] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Yes, I have read the judgement. I have also made the point here that no one would disagree with the basic premise that Parliament should scrutinise the actions of the government and that I thought Johnson acted unwisely.

Parliament has had enough time to force through the Benn Act and would have had more time for legislation prior to Oct 31 yet the judges decided prorogation (of, in reality, 3-4 lost days) denied Parliament the time to hold the Government to account. It is that that is a political argument and takes us into (almost) uncharted territory.

Unusual prorogations were used in 1930, 1948 and 1997 but the courts did not become involved then.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 7:51 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 407
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Ah, you're on form today! Shockingly rude as ever.

No statute has been broken but the SC has entered political territory. It's an important distinction.


I havenít been rude at all.

The SC judged unanimously that Johnsonís ruse was unlawful. Like Johnson, you seem to disagree with them.


steve walker
Administrator


Sep 24, 2019, 7:59 PM

Posts: 1807
Location: Staffordshire
Team(s):


Views: 396
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Ah, you're on form today! Shockingly rude as ever.

No statute has been broken but the SC has entered political territory. It's an important distinction.



How was my reply rude?

Obviously there is no law stating that suspending Parliament for [insert time here] is against the law. That would be ridiculous.

As you have obviously read the decision the Justices came to the conclusion they reached was that the actions of the Government had the effect of disallowing Parliament from asking the very many questions that they want to put to Government Ministers about many issues including Brexit. If they deem that "unlawful" then it's pretty clear that is against the law.

Even Johnson won't dare to go down the line of argument you are taking up here so I would be careful if I were you. Probably The Sun will have more 'Enemies of the People' headlines tomorrow, enjoy your copy.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 8:00 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 392
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Oh, come along now. Don't play the innocent!


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 8:04 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 384
     Re: [steve walker] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
How was my reply rude?


That wasn't a reply to you. You appear to have muddled your quotations.

However, the rest of your answer isn't so friendly but perhaps you've rather misunderstood me. The courts have always tried to avoid getting involved in the proceedings of the House. That is an observation that anyone could make from either side of the EU argument. Now that the courts have done so, they have set a precedent. Can you say where I have suggested that the ruling should be defied, which is one possible interpretation of what you have written?


(This post was edited by Mr. T on Sep 24, 2019, 8:22 PM)


steve walker
Administrator


Sep 24, 2019, 8:31 PM

Posts: 1807
Location: Staffordshire
Team(s):


Views: 351
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
How was my reply rude?


That wasn't a reply to you.

However, the rest of your answer isn't so friendly.

I do think you've rather misunderstood me. The courts have always tried to avoid getting involved in the proceedings of the House. That is an observation that anyone could make from either side of the EU argument. Now that the courts have done so, they have set a precedent. Can you say where I have suggested that the ruling should be defied, which is one possible interpretation of what you have written?


Yes I get that about your reply, no problem.

If you read the judgement then the Supreme Court do not consider the prorogation of Parliament to be a procedure of the House. It isn't voted on unlike a recess therefore they are not interfering with Parliament. We can to and fro about if that is right or not but all 11 Justices of the highest Court in the land determined it so.

I'll take their opinion over Johnsons to be honest whose history of being sacked over telling lies is legendary and goes way back as we all know.


northstandexile
First Team Regular

Sep 24, 2019, 8:39 PM

Posts: 1413
Location: Mansfield
Team(s): Mansfield Town


Views: 336
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Yes, I have read the judgement. I have also made the point here that no one would disagree with the basic premise that Parliament should scrutinise the actions of the government and that I thought Johnson acted unwisely.

Parliament has had enough time to force through the Benn Act and would have had more time for legislation prior to Oct 31 yet the judges decided prorogation (of, in reality, 3-4 lost days) denied Parliament the time to hold the Government to account. It is that that is a political argument and takes us into (almost) uncharted territory.

Unusual prorogations were used in 1930, 1948 and 1997 but the courts did not become involved then.



One of the issues here is that Prorogation is only normally a week, which is usually fine but this one is five weeks and Parliament had no say on the length.

Conference season is decided by parliament and is a 'recess'. Parliament has the right if it wishes to cancel a recess, with prorogation parliament has no say.

This 'losing 4 or 5 days' is not the issue. Parliament can cancel a recess but not a prorogation so this prorogation was to stop parliament having their say and not just the queens speech.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 8:40 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 335
     Re: [steve walker] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

But it is a political interjection inasmuch as they talk of time required to consider matters in the house. In this, our opinions are as valid as theirs!

Anyway, there'll be dozens of articles in the press over the next few days for everyone to study, either to confirm their bias or expand their knowledge.

Happy reading, everyone!


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 8:43 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 326
     Re: [northstandexile] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
This 'losing 4 or 5 days' is not the issue.

I made the point in #160 that' only 3-4 days business lost' is not a particularly convincing argument.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 8:44 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 325
     Re: [steve walker] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Ah, you're on form today! Shockingly rude as ever.

No statute has been broken but the SC has entered political territory. It's an important distinction.



How was my reply rude?

Obviously there is no law stating that suspending Parliament for [insert time here] is against the law. That would be ridiculous.

As you have obviously read the decision the Justices came to the conclusion they reached was that the actions of the Government had the effect of disallowing Parliament from asking the very many questions that they want to put to Government Ministers about many issues including Brexit. If they deem that "unlawful" then it's pretty clear that is against the law.

Even Johnson won't dare to go down the line of argument you are taking up here so I would be careful if I were you. Probably The Sun will have more 'Enemies of the People' headlines tomorrow, enjoy your copy.



The Court said the prorogation was unlawful in the sense that it was misused. In that I agree.
There is no doubt that Johnson used prorogation for other ends than the Queen's Speech.
Could he have known that it was going to be deemed 'unlawful' rather than 'political'....Not really. How could he have? There was no precedent and, as you point out , no specific statute to disobey.

Nowhere in their ruling is there any suggestion that Boris Johnson lied to the Queen, before any one starts spouting that nonsense.

I think Johnson was right to attempt prorogation and I support his attempt at prorogation , even if the courts disagree.

Johnson's fight against the powerful, influential and all pervasive EU/Remainer elite will win him plenty of votes in the GE.

I predict a vote of No Confidence in parliament (maybe from a Tory MP ) leading to a GE and an overwhelming Tory victory.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 9:00 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 305
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I predict a vote of No Confidence in parliament (maybe from a Tory MP ) leading to a GE and an overwhelming Tory victory.


Your predictive skills haven't been too great so far.

Why on earth would Labour go along with a NC motion? A GE plays into Johnson's hands. It's what he's been begging for. It's the only way he and the Tories can escape humiliation. Opposition tactics should be to do nothing until 31 October. Just let Johnson and the Tories stew, let them humiliate themselves by extending A50 and and they will be toast at the next election.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 9:03 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 302
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
A

No statute has been broken but the SC has entered political territory.


2016 We don't want foreign courts interfering in our affairs

2019 We don't want UK courts interfering in our affairs.


steve walker
Administrator


Sep 24, 2019, 9:08 PM

Posts: 1807
Location: Staffordshire
Team(s):


Views: 301
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
But it is a political interjection inasmuch as they talk of time required to consider matters in the house. In this, our opinions are as valid as theirs!

Anyway, there'll be dozens of articles in the press over the next few days for everyone to study, either to confirm their bias or expand their knowledge.

Happy reading, everyone!



well, they do say there those so blind that they refuse to see. As we are so close to the Brexit deadline I want to see Parliament asking questions of Ministers. Johnson says he is getting a deal with the EU, I want to see him being questioned about this. It affects me. I want to know what is happening, why wouldn't I?

As the clock ticks down I worry that my wife who is an EU National will suddenly have her status changed. This is not just an ideological thing it really affects real people.

You can talk all you like about Brexit and Johnson and whatever and argue amongst yourselves about semantics and try to get one over the previous poster. The fact is that this affects real people and I'm not sure any of you when you are trying to make your clever posts to get one over whoever disagrees with you really realises how this situation actually affects people.

It's just an ideological argument for most of you. It's a practical argument for some. That's me bowing out of this thread for now and you can continue to argue your ideals with no consequences if you want to.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 9:26 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 279
     Re: [steve walker] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
As the clock ticks down I worry that my wife who is an EU National will suddenly have her status changed. This is not just an ideological thing it really affects real people.

I shall politely demur at the suggestion that a debate about the base of power and law in the UK is merely semantic and ideological clever-dickery. See post #162 Ė my reference is to trade and borders but can be applied to all matters affected.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 9:31 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 267
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
I predict a vote of No Confidence in parliament (maybe from a Tory MP ) leading to a GE and an overwhelming Tory victory.


Your predictive skills haven't been too great so far.

Why on earth would Labour go along with a NC motion? A GE plays into Johnson's hands. It's what he's been begging for. It's the only way he and the Tories can escape humiliation. Opposition tactics should be to do nothing until 31 October. Just let Johnson and the Tories stew, let them humiliate themselves by extending A50 and and they will be toast at the next election.


I predicted prorogation months ago.....Got that right!

I predicted our Parliamentarians would do the decent and honest thing and respect the will of the people as expressed through the legal and binding EU referendum of three years ago..........I got that wrong!


northstandexile
First Team Regular

Sep 24, 2019, 9:32 PM

Posts: 1413
Location: Mansfield
Team(s): Mansfield Town


Views: 265
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
As the clock ticks down I worry that my wife who is an EU National will suddenly have her status changed. This is not just an ideological thing it really affects real people.

I shall politely demur at the suggestion that a debate about the base of power and law in the UK is merely semantic and ideological clever-dickery. See post #162 Ė my reference is to trade and borders but can be applied to all matters affected.

Leaving must mean a change in border and customs arrangements.
In post 162 you say the above. What changes do you want to see between NI and ROI


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 9:42 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 257
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
I predict a vote of No Confidence in parliament (maybe from a Tory MP ) leading to a GE and an overwhelming Tory victory.


Your predictive skills haven't been too great so far.

Why on earth would Labour go along with a NC motion? A GE plays into Johnson's hands. It's what he's been begging for. It's the only way he and the Tories can escape humiliation. Opposition tactics should be to do nothing until 31 October. Just let Johnson and the Tories stew, let them humiliate themselves by extending A50 and and they will be toast at the next election.


I predicted prorogation months ago.....Got that right!

I predicted our Parliamentarians would do the decent and honest thing and respect the will of the people as expressed through the legal and binding EU referendum of three years ago..........I got that wrong!


Prorogation never happened, You got it wrong,


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 9:42 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 257
     Re: [northstandexile] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Leaving must mean a change in border and customs arrangements.
In post 162 you say the above. What changes do you want to see between NI and ROI?

As few as possible. Whatever happens should be decided between the UK and the ROI. Some intelligent input from the HoC would have been good (that was the point I was making in that message) but it hasn't been forthcoming. Doom-mongering prevailed.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 9:46 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 250
     Re: [steve walker] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
But it is a political interjection inasmuch as they talk of time required to consider matters in the house. In this, our opinions are as valid as theirs!

Anyway, there'll be dozens of articles in the press over the next few days for everyone to study, either to confirm their bias or expand their knowledge.

Happy reading, everyone!



well, they do say there those so blind that they refuse to see. As we are so close to the Brexit deadline I want to see Parliament asking questions of Ministers. Johnson says he is getting a deal with the EU, I want to see him being questioned about this. It affects me. I want to know what is happening, why wouldn't I?

As the clock ticks down I worry that my wife who is an EU National will suddenly have her status changed. This is not just an ideological thing it really affects real people.

You can talk all you like about Brexit and Johnson and whatever and argue amongst yourselves about semantics and try to get one over the previous poster. The fact is that this affects real people and I'm not sure any of you when you are trying to make your clever posts to get one over whoever disagrees with you really realises how this situation actually affects people.

It's just an ideological argument for most of you. It's a practical argument for some. That's me bowing out of this thread for now and you can continue to argue your ideals with no consequences if you want to.


Yes Brexit affects real people but your partner's problem of status is easily solvable via the application for settled status process.........But you know that.

Conversely , EU membership adversely affected millions of real people too. That's why 17.4 million of them voted Brexit.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 9:49 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 247
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

But ROI is in the EU, NI wonít be.

If we leave without a deal, how do you avoid a border?

Remember, if Johnson gets his way, and you support no deal Brexit, this will be happening in 5 weeks time.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 9:49 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 246
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
I predict a vote of No Confidence in parliament (maybe from a Tory MP ) leading to a GE and an overwhelming Tory victory.


Your predictive skills haven't been too great so far.

Why on earth would Labour go along with a NC motion? A GE plays into Johnson's hands. It's what he's been begging for. It's the only way he and the Tories can escape humiliation. Opposition tactics should be to do nothing until 31 October. Just let Johnson and the Tories stew, let them humiliate themselves by extending A50 and and they will be toast at the next election.


I predicted prorogation months ago.....Got that right!

I predicted our Parliamentarians would do the decent and honest thing and respect the will of the people as expressed through the legal and binding EU referendum of three years ago..........I got that wrong!


Prorogation never happened, You got it wrong,


Of course it never, that's why Parliament sat today and sat all last week, and the week before etc,

And the people didn't vote 52% -48% to leave the EU neither......

And..... Your Back In The Room!


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 9:51 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 242
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Conversely , EU membership adversely affected millions of real people too. That's why 17.4 million of them voted Brexit.


In what way!


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 9:55 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 240
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
But ROI is in the EU, NI wonít be.

If we leave without a deal, how do you avoid a border?

Remember, if Johnson gets his way, and you support no deal Brexit, this will be happening in 5 weeks time.


A hard border designed and built by Brussels ...... oh how well they've played this game!


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 24, 2019, 9:57 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 232
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

My hope is that intelligence prevails. All around the world, goods cross customs barriers without on-the-spot intervention. Most inspections and virtually all collections of tariffs occur 'behind the lines'. However, I suppose there will have to be some modest checks on people moving between Ireland and the UK.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 9:58 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 829
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

Conversely , EU membership adversely affected millions of real people too. That's why 17.4 million of them voted Brexit.


In what way![/reply

Do you even live in the UK ?

Oh no, silly me, of course . Before the referendum there were a couple of thousand fascists in the UK.

The day after there were 17..4 million fascists in the UK........Just Like That!


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 10:00 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 826
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
My hope is that intelligence prevails. All around the world, goods cross customs barriers without on-the-spot intervention. Most inspections and virtually all collections of tariffs occur 'behind the lines'. However, I suppose there will have to be some modest checks on people moving between Ireland and the UK.


I agree except for checks on people..........Not a single check on people whatsoever should be the UK position.

Not one check on one single person on the island of Ireland.......simples!


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 10:02 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 821
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
But ROI is in the EU, NI wonít be.

If we leave without a deal, how do you avoid a border?

Remember, if Johnson gets his way, and you support no deal Brexit, this will be happening in 5 weeks time.


A hard border designed and built by Brussels ...... oh how well they've played this game!


Designed by Brussels?

The UK will have chosen to leave the Common Market without a deal. The consequences will be 100% of our making.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 10:04 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 820
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

Conversely , EU membership adversely affected millions of real people too. That's why 17.4 million of them voted Brexit.


In what way![/reply

Do you even live in the UK ?

Oh no, silly me, of course . Before the referendum there were a couple of thousand fascists in the UK.

The day after there were 17..4 million fascists in the UK........Just Like That!


Eh? Thatís not an answer to my question. In what way were 17.4 m adversely affected by being in the EU?


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 10:22 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 800
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

Conversely , EU membership adversely affected millions of real people too. That's why 17.4 million of them voted Brexit.


In what way![/reply

Do you even live in the UK ?

Oh no, silly me, of course . Before the referendum there were a couple of thousand fascists in the UK.

The day after there were 17..4 million fascists in the UK........Just Like That!


Eh? Thatís not an answer to my question. In what way were 17.4 m adversely affected by being in the EU?


Honestly, Paul C, you asked that question numerous times and been answered numerous times.......My question to you is..Given your dismissive, arrogant and superior attitude to Leave voters.....

Why are you even asking,...........?


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 10:26 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 793
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
But ROI is in the EU, NI wonít be.

If we leave without a deal, how do you avoid a border?

Remember, if Johnson gets his way, and you support no deal Brexit, this will be happening in 5 weeks time.


A hard border designed and built by Brussels ...... oh how well they've played this game!




Designed by Brussels?

The UK will have chosen to leave the Common Market without a deal. The consequences will be 100% of our making.


The border is between two allegedly Sovereign nations.
We brokered the GFA with Eire and the two communities,

We could be talking with that other ' Sovereign' nation if Brussels would let them,lol!

Yes, Made In Brussels, y'know, Brussels.........The capital city of Ireland!!


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 10:27 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 785
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

Conversely , EU membership adversely affected millions of real people too. That's why 17.4 million of them voted Brexit.


In what way![/reply

Do you even live in the UK ?

Oh no, silly me, of course . Before the referendum there were a couple of thousand fascists in the UK.

The day after there were 17..4 million fascists in the UK........Just Like That!


Eh? Thatís not an answer to my question. In what way were 17.4 m adversely affected by being in the EU?


Honestly, Paul C, you asked that question numerous times and been answered numerous times.......My question to you is..Given your dismissive, arrogant and superior attitude to Leave voters.....

Why are you even asking,...........?


You still arenít answering. Why not?


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 10:34 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 777
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The border is between two allegedly Sovereign nations.
We brokered the GFA with Eire and the two communities,

We could be talking with that other ' Sovereign' nation if Brussels would let them,lol!

Yes, Made In Brussels, y'know, Brussels.........The capital city of Ireland!!


Of its own volition, RoI has chosen to be part of the largest single market in the world.

Of its own volition, it adheres to the rules of the organisation it has joined.

It is typical Brexiteer cloud cuckoo land to think we can deal with one part of the European Union in a different way from the rest. It will not happen and never could.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 24, 2019, 10:52 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 767
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

Conversely , EU membership adversely affected millions of real people too. That's why 17.4 million of them voted Brexit.


In what way![/reply

Do you even live in the UK ?

Oh no, silly me, of course . Before the referendum there were a couple of thousand fascists in the UK.

The day after there were 17..4 million fascists in the UK........Just Like That!


Eh? Thatís not an answer to my question. In what way were 17.4 m adversely affected by being in the EU?


Honestly, Paul C, you asked that question numerous times and been answered numerous times.......My question to you is..Given your dismissive, arrogant and superior attitude to Leave voters.....

Why are you even asking,...........?


You still arenít answering. Why not?


Because I've told you before.

You tell me why you think 17.4 million people voted Leave.

Try not to be snide, condescending, morally superior or patronising. Talk not of lies ( because there were mistruths and fear mongering on the Remain side) Talk not of the usual stereotypical tropes Remainers have trotted out to dehumanise and besmirch the winners in the referendum but let's have from you an honest and candid attempt to genuineluy 'understand' and verbalise why YOU think so many millions of yiour fellow UK citizens voted this way. Without the hate, the vitriol and without the enmity.

Go on........


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 24, 2019, 10:59 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 761
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Well, Iím always happy to answer questions, even if others arenít.

The principal stated reason was immigration.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 25, 2019, 6:09 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 714
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Well, Iím always happy to answer questions, even if others arenít.

The principal stated reason was immigration.



I'm glad you are happy to answer questions but your reply is not good enough.


What , in detail, were the problems with and effects of immigration that voters regarded as sufficiently negative to cause such a seismic change in British political expression.?

Also, Was that really the only issue that affected voters' decision to Leave or was there even more to it?

Tbh I wasn't wanting you to regurgitate the 'Official' stated reason beause there is no point in asking you if that's all you're going to do.

I'm interested in drilling down in to your honest , personal feeling on this matter.


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Sep 25, 2019, 6:22 AM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 25, 2019, 7:39 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 691
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Well, Iím always happy to answer questions, even if others arenít.

The principal stated reason was immigration.



I'm glad you are happy to answer questions but your reply is not good enough.


What , in detail, were the problems with and effects of immigration that voters regarded as sufficiently negative to cause such a seismic change in British political expression.?

Also, Was that really the only issue that affected voters' decision to Leave or was there even more to it?

Tbh I wasn't wanting you to regurgitate the 'Official' stated reason beause there is no point in asking you if that's all you're going to do.

I'm interested in drilling down in to your honest , personal feeling on this matter.


It's peculiar that a Brexiteer wants to know from a Remainer the reasons why Brexiteers did as they did. Especially since the Remainer was the one asking the question.

I didn't give you the "Official" principal reason, whatever that might mean - but the one arising from academic research into to the thought processes of Brexiteers. But yes I'm sure there were others - "fancying a change", "wanting to give Cameron a bloody nose, "wanting more powerful vacuum cleaners" are all there too.

Over to you.


northstandexile
First Team Regular

Sep 25, 2019, 8:01 AM

Posts: 1413
Location: Mansfield
Team(s): Mansfield Town


Views: 674
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Well, Iím always happy to answer questions, even if others arenít.

The principal stated reason was immigration.



I'm glad you are happy to answer questions but your reply is not good enough.


What , in detail, were the problems with and effects of immigration that voters regarded as sufficiently negative to cause such a seismic change in British political expression.?

Also, Was that really the only issue that affected voters' decision to Leave or was there even more to it?

Tbh I wasn't wanting you to regurgitate the 'Official' stated reason beause there is no point in asking you if that's all you're going to do.

I'm interested in drilling down in to your honest , personal feeling on this matter.


As been said in a post higher up the reason vote leave had more votes than remain was apart from being brainwashed by the right wing press for 40 years was immigration.

I am a staunch remainer living in Mansfield, a 71% leave area with a run down ex-industrial economy but unbelievably since 2017 with a Tory MP.

Last week I was in the local sub post office on a ex council estate at the back of the queue which was nearly out the door. Nothing unusual you say, except everyone collecting their pension was complaining about the queue.

With one poor sod on the counter the reason for the hold up was a young Romanian lad with a poor knowledge of the English language trying to send money back to his widowed mother in Romania.

I would imagine every pensioner in that queue voted leave. Simple things like this had an effect as well as giving Cameron a bloody nose.


MelChester
Junior Team Regular

Sep 25, 2019, 9:54 AM

Posts: 41
Location: Cotswolds
Team(s):


Views: 634
     Re: [northstandexile] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Why are the pensioners queueing for their pensions, surely many now have their pensions paid into a bank account. Thought there was a big push a few years ago to get away from big queues in the Post Office, car tax online was another queue buster.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 25, 2019, 10:18 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 619
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
Well, Iím always happy to answer questions, even if others arenít.

The principal stated reason was immigration.



I'm glad you are happy to answer questions but your reply is not good enough.


What , in detail, were the problems with and effects of immigration that voters regarded as sufficiently negative to cause such a seismic change in British political expression.?

Also, Was that really the only issue that affected voters' decision to Leave or was there even more to it?

Tbh I wasn't wanting you to regurgitate the 'Official' stated reason beause there is no point in asking you if that's all you're going to do.

I'm interested in drilling down in to your honest , personal feeling on this matter.


It's peculiar that a Brexiteer wants to know from a Remainer the reasons why Brexiteers did as they did. Especially since the Remainer was the one asking the question.

I didn't give you the "Official" principal reason, whatever that might mean - but the one arising from academic research into to the thought processes of Brexiteers. But yes I'm sure there were others - "fancying a change", "wanting to give Cameron a bloody nose, "wanting more powerful vacuum cleaners" are all there too.

Over to you.


Those are superficial reasons. You dont honestly believe the tropes about 'vacuum cleaners' and ' blue passports' , surely?
No, you don't.

The reason was far more innate, instinctual ,fundamental.

Try again you need to know your enemy.

I'm dropping hints and clues and signposts but still you are going in the wrong direction.
If you truly want to mend society, heal the fissure then think about working class society far away from the levers, privilege and machinations of power, think of family, of community, belonging ,emotional investment, roots!
Forget politics.
Politics isnt why people voted Leave.


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Sep 25, 2019, 10:20 AM)


Part-Timer
Chelsea Transfer Target

Sep 25, 2019, 11:23 AM

Posts: 4526
Location: Huntingdonshire
Team(s): Brentford, Bradford City, Peterborough United, Yaxley


Views: 597
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
My hope is that intelligence prevails. All around the world, goods cross customs barriers without on-the-spot intervention. Most inspections and virtually all collections of tariffs occur 'behind the lines'. However, I suppose there will have to be some modest checks on people moving between Ireland and the UK.

Anyone who has experienced the border between Poland and Ukraine would question this. Prior to Poland's accession to the EU the border was free-flowing (actually porous would probably be a better word). After accession the EU built a hard border which causes significant delays to the transportation of goods every day.


Chris1963
Man City Transfer Target!

Sep 25, 2019, 12:53 PM

Posts: 6942
Location: North London
Team(s): Oxford United / Groundhopper


Views: 566
     Re: [Part-Timer] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Anyone who has experienced the border between Poland and Ukraine would question this. Prior to Poland's accession to the EU the border was free-flowing (actually porous would probably be a better word). After accession the EU built a hard border which causes significant delays to the transportation of goods every day.


That is interesting, I didn't know that. However, I suppose it goes some way towards explaining why they jointly hosted the Euro football finals several years ago. The two countries must have had a good relationship for some time before then.


northstandexile
First Team Regular

Sep 25, 2019, 6:58 PM

Posts: 1413
Location: Mansfield
Team(s): Mansfield Town


Views: 427
     Re: [MelChester] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Why are the pensioners queueing for their pensions, surely many now have their pensions paid into a bank account. Thought there was a big push a few years ago to get away from big queues in the Post Office, car tax online was another queue buster.


These pensioners go with their post office card, put it in the machine on the PO counter and withdraw all the cash in the account each week. I know it is unbelievable but many do around here.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 26, 2019, 10:21 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 313
     Re: [northstandexile] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Out of interest, does anyone think it was worth recalling Parliament for that 12 hours of play-ground nonsense yesterday?

Both sides spitting poison at each other does little to resolve the crisis of the day or make the U.K. look particularly good.

So, all weíll get until Boris comes back from the EU summit, is the opposition telling him to resign, but not actually forcing him out.

Pointless.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 26, 2019, 10:43 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 299
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Out of interest, does anyone think it was worth recalling Parliament for that 12 hours of play-ground nonsense yesterday?

Both sides spitting poison at each other does little to resolve the crisis of the day or make the U.K. look particularly good.

So, all weíll get until Boris comes back from the EU summit, is the opposition telling him to resign, but not actually forcing him out.

Pointless.


Yesterday's proceedings may have been regarded as 'lawful' but they were most definitely 'void' and of 'no effect'

Emotionally illiterate Labour MP's spitting vitriol and bile and throwing out spurios accusations and exploiting the grief of the death of an MP was
as low as it gets.

Did the Supreme Court rule against the Government for that ShitShow?

More proof that MP's live in a bubble where they take up even more parliamentary time on their own issues , their own anxieties and their own prejudices...........Stuff the electorate let's focus on US!!!


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 26, 2019, 12:12 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 264
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Out of interest, does anyone think it was worth recalling Parliament for that 12 hours of play-ground nonsense yesterday?

Both sides spitting poison at each other does little to resolve the crisis of the day or make the U.K. look particularly good.

So, all weíll get until Boris comes back from the EU summit, is the opposition telling him to resign, but not actually forcing him out.

Pointless.


Yesterday's proceedings may have been regarded as 'lawful' but they were most definitely 'void' and of 'no effect'

Emotionally illiterate Labour MP's spitting vitriol and bile and throwing out spurios accusations and exploiting the grief of the death of an MP was
as low as it gets.

Did the Supreme Court rule against the Government for that ShitShow?

More proof that MP's live in a bubble where they take up even more parliamentary time on their own issues , their own anxieties and their own prejudices...........Stuff the electorate let's focus on US!!!


007 rightly pointed out that both sides were "spitting poison at each other". Trying to pretend that one side were worse than the other simply isn't credible. The language employed by both sides matter. Otherwise Jo Cox isn't the only actual casualty that Brexcrement will produce.

Personally, I found the fifth rate amateur dramatics of Geoffrey Cox particularly risible and pathetic.

What amazes me is why Johnson made such a stupid blunder as opting for an extended prorogation when ever since the 2016 Referendum the Commons had shown no ability to decide on anything. All he did was unite the various anti No Deal factions. The usual standard Recess over the Conference season would have been a non controversial way of disposing of at least three weeks of Commons sitting, if he'd really thought it necessary.

For once I agree with Nigel Farage and his assessment of prorogation as being the "worst political decision ever".

https://www.express.co.uk/...ion-Dominic-Cummings
.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 12:31 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 255
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Jess Philips currently speaking in Parliament stating this week she received a death threat ... quoting Johnson.

It does no good trying to defend and normalise the appalling behaviour of Johnson and his gang of cronies. Johnson is the personification of amorality. He and his cronies are a moral vacuum.

Tories are heading down the same path as the Nazi party. They attack any opposition as traitors, they shut down and silence parliament. They defy the law and threaten the judiciary.

If anyone still wonders how Germany, an advanced democracy, went mad in the 1930s, now they know. Destroy Parliamentary democracy, turn the people against the parliament and exploit the stupidity of so many in the electorate who are so easily led by the media they control.


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 26, 2019, 12:33 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 255
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Yesterday was probably the lowest we've ever seen from any PM in UK parliamentary history. He sank lower than a snakes belly in my view with The mention of Jo Cox death. It went way beyond politics. This was just downright inflammatory rhetoric designed to stoke up division, as callous as it gets !



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 12:51 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 247
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Caroline Nokes recounting being told in Romsey she was a traitor who deserved to be shot.

This is the world of Tory Brexit.


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 26, 2019, 1:06 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 241
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Out of interest, does anyone think it was worth recalling Parliament for that 12 hours of play-ground nonsense yesterday?

Both sides spitting poison at each other does little to resolve the crisis of the day or make the U.K. look particularly good.

So, all weíll get until Boris comes back from the EU summit, is the opposition telling him to resign, but not actually forcing him out.

Pointless.


Awful to watch.

Maybe Johnson should have delayed his return from the USA and let Gove lead in the debate. It's possible he was jet lagged and that affected his judgement and performance. I don't think his up and at 'em approach won him any friends among the Labour MPs for Leave voting constituencies that he needs (on the current state of the parties) to pass any Deal through Parliament.

.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 26, 2019, 1:06 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 607
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Johnson did not raise the subject of Jo Cox. That was done by Labour MPs.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 1:27 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 584
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Johnson did not raise the subject of Jo Cox. That was done by Labour MPs.


ďThe best way to honour Jo Coxís memory is to get Brexit doneĒ
Boris Johnson


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 1:32 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 581
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I don't think his up and at 'em approach won him any friends among the Labour MPs for Leave voting constituencies that he needs (on the current state of the parties) to pass any Deal through Parliament.

.


It wasn't really for House of Commons consumption. It was just red meet for the 35%. Upping the ante for the gammon which respond positively to Johnson's vitriol It will all have been wargamed by Johnson and his cronies.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 26, 2019, 1:35 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 576
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Johnson did not raise the subject of Jo Cox. That was done by Labour MPs.


ďThe best way to honour Jo Coxís memory is to get Brexit doneĒ
Boris Johnson


And?


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 26, 2019, 1:39 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 570
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Johnson did not raise the subject of Jo Cox. That was done by Labour MPs.


Exactly!

It's the emotional illiteracy of Opposition MPs that has create poisonous rhetoric.
They play the emotive card whenever they cant find the race card.
A labour MP mentioned Cox .....the PM gave it the correct perspective....

Get Brexit Done!

Btw has any else seen the nasty, seething ,objectionable and hate filled ranting of Labours poison Dwarf, John McDonnell doing the rounds on Twitter?

Truly bloody shocking!


paulh66
Qatar World Cup bid member!


Sep 26, 2019, 1:49 PM

Posts: 19265
Location: Surrey
Team(s): Tranmere Rovers, South Liverpool (the South will rise again), Cammell Laird


Views: 556
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I sat watching two hours of that fiasco with jaw to the floor. Shocking stuff. Anyone on either side trying to squeeze even a drop of one-upmanship out of that disgusting pantomime really needs to look at themselves.

Most depressing thing for the political state of the country, regardless of what happens in the next few weeks, is there's no real groundswell of gravitas and integrity waiting in the political wings.

Dangerous times.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 1:50 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 556
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
Johnson did not raise the subject of Jo Cox. That was done by Labour MPs.


ďThe best way to honour Jo Coxís memory is to get Brexit doneĒ
Boris Johnson


And?


And that was his own comment. He decided to pick up the reference to Jo Cox and run with it in a reply to a further question in order to sell Brexit.

Shameful stuff.

https://metro.co.uk/...rexit-done-10809336/


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 1:55 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 549
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

It's interesting, though unsurprising, to see who they are who seek to defend and normalise the behaviour of Johnson.

The man is a boor, a racist, a liar, a faciliatator of assault on a journalist. He seeks to close down Parliamentary debate.

He is totally unfit for public office and this reflects very badly on those who stand up for this moral vacuum.


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 26, 2019, 1:56 PM)


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 26, 2019, 1:57 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 544
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The shame was solely on the Labour MPs. He was put on the spot by them. He could have ignored it; he could have answered it better. Some of the media headlines are shamefully misleading.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 2:03 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 532
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

You think the best way to honour the memory of someone who argued against Brexit and was murdered by a Brexiteer is to support Brexit.???


Here's what Johnson's sister Rachel thinks of him.

https://twitter.com/.../1177191675048943616

If I were supporting amorality personified I would be having a major rethink.


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 26, 2019, 2:09 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 520
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
You think the best way to honour the memory of someone who argued against Brexit and was murdered by a Brexiteer is to support Brexit?

That is a grotesque misrepresentation of what I wrote. Shame on you too.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 2:12 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 513
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
You think the best way to honour the memory of someone who argued against Brexit and was murdered by a Brexiteer is to support Brexit?

That is a grotesque misrepresentation of what I wrote. Shame on you too.


It's what Johnson said. In a QUESTION I asked if that was what you thought too.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 26, 2019, 2:13 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 513
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
You think the best way to honour the memory of someone who argued against Brexit and was murdered by a Brexiteer is to support Brexit.???


Here's what Johnson's sister Rachel thinks of him.

https://twitter.com/.../1177191675048943616

If I were supporting amorality personified I would be having a major rethink.


That's tosh....
Jo Cox's position on Brexit is irrelevant to the democratic choice of the UK electorate. The political position of the killer should have no influence or bearing on polo
It is today.

What Jo Cox campaigned for was TOLERANCE and COMMON GROUND, and you using her death to campaign for stopping Brexit is disgusting and trying to justify the campaign to stop Brexit because Jo Cox just happened to be a remainer.
If Jo Cox liked red shoes are you saying we should all wear red shoes..

Your point


Mr. T
Chelsea Transfer Target


Sep 26, 2019, 2:59 PM

Posts: 5371
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 484
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
You think the best way to honour the memory of someone who argued against Brexit and was murdered by a Brexiteer is to support Brexit?

That is a grotesque misrepresentation of what I wrote. Shame on you too.

It's what Johnson said. In a QUESTION I asked if that was what you thought too.


No. The misrepresentation IS your question and the manner of its asking. I had already written that he could have responded differently.

If you were to argue that Johnson is a poor performer at the Despatch Box I would agree with you. He's not quick enough on his feet in those circumstances and his merry little quips and off-the-cuff one-liners, which should be left outside, were always going to get him in to trouble but he did not raise the subject of Jo Cox. That was quite disgracefully done by Labour MPs.

The events in the HoC of the last two days have been appalling. Few come out with any credit.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 4:59 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 442
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The events in the HoC of the last two days have been appalling. Few come out with any credit.


One who does is Jeremy Corbyn.

Whilst Johnson fights for a place in the gutter, appealing to the lowest common denominator of the UK electorate, Corbyn behaves like a consummate parliamentarian. Despite all attempts by the Tory rent-a-mob on the backbenches Corbyn just gets on with it. Never riled ,no theatrics, invariably polite and respectful of the House and the Speaker.

The contrast with the amoral, opportunist, entitled Johnson could not be greater.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 26, 2019, 6:38 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 412
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
The events in the HoC of the last two days have been appalling. Few come out with any credit.


One who does is Jeremy Corbyn.

Whilst Johnson fights for a place in the gutter, appealing to the lowest common denominator of the UK electorate, Corbyn behaves like a consummate parliamentarian. Despite all attempts by the Tory rent-a-mob on the backbenches Corbyn just gets on with it. Never riled ,no theatrics, invariably polite and respectful of the House and the Speaker.

The contrast with the amoral, opportunist, entitled Johnson could not be greater.


You think his indifference towards Brexit and the Electorate is noble?

You think that forgives him his support for Irish murderers and terrorists, his friendship ( his words) with Hamas and Hezbollah?

Did you look at the twitter footage of John McDonnel and his threats of violence?

Do you still support milkshaking?

You mght suffer from selective amnesia but I don't and nor do the electorate.

Johnson has not said anything untoward but the extreme emotive reactions on the opposition benches is indicative of their lack of suitability for the job of MP.

GE Now and we can purge parliament of these charlatans.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 7:29 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 388
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

 

Most of that does not relate to Corbyn.

None of it relates to his deportment in the Commons.

Apart from that, great comeback. LOL!


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 26, 2019, 11:15 PM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 320
     Re: [Mr. T] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I have a feeling the remainers are falling into the same trap they did during the 2016 referendum. Mud-slinging at Boris, is only going to strengthen the voters resolve for Leave. They are out-of-touch with the public.

My God, Boris is not perfect, as evidenced by his performance yesterday, but heís viewed as someone trying to deliver on the Peopleís wishes.

I know for some people the thought is horrifying and they wonít believe the British people will vote for him, but I think every day that passes is increasing his majority in the upcoming General Election.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 26, 2019, 11:29 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 312
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I have a feeling the remainers are falling into the same trap they did during the 2016 referendum. Mud-slinging at Boris, is only going to strengthen the voters resolve for Leave. They are out-of-touch with the public.

My God, Boris is not perfect, as evidenced by his performance yesterday, but heís viewed as someone trying to deliver on the Peopleís wishes.

I know for some people the thought is horrifying and they wonít believe the British people will vote for him, but I think every day that passes is increasing his majority in the upcoming General Election.


What the opposition parties have been doing is stopping a calamitous No Deal Brexit. No more, no less.

No one in their right minds can look at the consequences of a No Deal Brexit and say "Bring it on!" At the moment, they are putting their energies into preventing Johnson doing just that.

As for every day increasing his majority - the evidence is quite the opposite. The gap is narrowing.

And. of course there is now a majority against Brexit - of the order of 54-46.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 27, 2019, 6:05 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 265
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
I have a feeling the remainers are falling into the same trap they did during the 2016 referendum. Mud-slinging at Boris, is only going to strengthen the voters resolve for Leave. They are out-of-touch with the public.

My God, Boris is not perfect, as evidenced by his performance yesterday, but heís viewed as someone trying to deliver on the Peopleís wishes.

I know for some people the thought is horrifying and they wonít believe the British people will vote for him, but I think every day that passes is increasing his majority in the upcoming General Election.


What the opposition parties have been doing is stopping a calamitous No Deal Brexit. No more, no less.


You don't believe that , I don't believe that, The Country does not believe that !


That's as honest as Boris claiming prorogation was not about Brexit!


The problem forthe opposition is there is not a single person on this planet that does not think the opposition's only objective is to halt Brexit.

If that wasn't so the opposition would be working to get the best deal possible.............They woulld be hrlping the Gov't.

They would not be hamstringing the Gov't's negotiating capability.
They would not be colluding with the EU.
They would not be colluding with unelected , wealthy business people and using their resources against the express wishes of the electorate.
They would not have progressed The Surrender Bill through the House.

My partner voted Remain because she wanted to keep the Status Quo................Now she would vote Leave because the Status Quo has been shattered.

Many Remainers now feel that way and feel the way the EU and European leaders across all 27 States have disrespected the UK, disrespected our negotiators and disrespected our former PM and disrespected our current PM............

They no longer feel at home in the EU!


MelChester
Junior Team Regular

Sep 27, 2019, 7:39 AM

Posts: 41
Location: Cotswolds
Team(s):


Views: 253
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Not sure where you actually live but I would say the complete opposite, the UK government has been disrespecting to the EU. Most leavers I know either now want to remain or have a Norway type deal. The latter which most thought they were voting for in the first place, not No Deal.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 27, 2019, 8:37 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 225
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

As for every day increasing his majority - the evidence is quite the opposite. The gap is narrowing.

.


Even your trusty polls canít back up that:

YouGov 19-20 Sept: Tories 30 / Labour 23
YouGov 24-25 Sept: Tories 33 / Labour 22

BTW, that last You Gov poll would give the Tories a 64 seat majority.

Sadly, the remainers fall into the same trap every time. They are so full of self-righteousness that they fail to understand the mood of the general population. They consistently fail to comprehend what people want and therefore donít offer them a viable alternative when campaigning. All national votes in since 2014 prove it, yet remainers cling to the view that if you constantly talk down to leavers they will change their mind.

If I was a remainer, I would beg the politicians to change tact.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 27, 2019, 8:49 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 220
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

ComRes 24/9
Lab 27%
Tories 27%

Survation 25/9
Tories 27% -2
Lab 24%
LD 22%


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 27, 2019, 10:08 AM)


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 27, 2019, 10:10 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 184
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
ComRes 24/9
Lab 27%
Tories 27%

Survation 25/9
Tories 27% -2
Lab 24%
LD 22%


You don't believe that.

I don't believe that.

The country doesn't believe that.



Polls have been criminally misleading for years.
Anyone who quotes polls to make a point is being disingenuous.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 27, 2019, 10:19 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 180
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

LOL!


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 27, 2019, 10:25 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 639
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

My God, Boris is not perfect, as evidenced by his performance yesterday, but heís viewed as someone trying to deliver on the Peopleís wishes.


Should Johnson resign?

Yes 43%
No 39%


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 27, 2019, 10:42 AM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 628
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Sadly, the remainers fall into the same trap every time. They are so full of self-righteousness that they fail to understand the mood of the general population.

They consistently fail to comprehend what people want and therefore donít offer them a viable alternative when campaigning. All national votes in since 2014 prove it, yet remainers cling to the view that if you constantly talk down to leavers they will change their mind.

If I was a remainer, I would beg the politicians to change tact.


There's at least as much self righteousness among Leavers as among Remainers.

And the "Will of the People" so frequently and mystically invoked is simply the will of 52% of the electorate on a Poll held more than three years ago.

As for the current "mood of the general population" I'd be very wary of deciding what that is purely by the people we personally associate with, or the propaganda being peddled by the newspapers on both sides of the argument.

One of the fake news elements of the Johnson line is that it is just Remainers who have prevented us leaving the EU. May's Deal would have taken us out of the EU back in March but was voted down by a combination of Remainers and Extremist Conservative Leavers of Steve Baker/Andrew Bridgen ilk and their DUP allies.

.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 27, 2019, 11:20 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 615
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
My partner voted Remain because she wanted to keep the Status Quo................Now she would vote Leave because the Status Quo has been shattered.

Many Remainers now feel that way[


Reality is quite different from your own narrow experience. It's amusing reading about your disdain for scientifically conducted polls whilst extrapolating your partner's views to represent the whole of the UK!

Polls show the Remain lead is in the order of 54-46%. None of the 100+ polls conducted since 2017 has shown a majority in favour of leaving the EU.

We have changed our minds.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 27, 2019, 11:23 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 613
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Don't forget Johnson among those who brought down May's deal.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 27, 2019, 11:25 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 608
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
My partner voted Remain because she wanted to keep the Status Quo................Now she would vote Leave because the Status Quo has been shattered.

Many Remainers now feel that way[


Reality is quite different from your own narrow experience. It's amusing reading about your disdain for scientifically conducted polls whilst extrapolating your partner's views to represent the whole of the UK!

Polls show the Remain lead is in the order of 54-46%. None of the 100+ polls conducted since 2017 has shown a majority in favour of leaving the EU.

We have changed our minds.


Oh dear, clinging to false hope. Some things never change.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 27, 2019, 11:34 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 602
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
My partner voted Remain because she wanted to keep the Status Quo................Now she would vote Leave because the Status Quo has been shattered.

Many Remainers now feel that way[


Reality is quite different from your own narrow experience. It's amusing reading about your disdain for scientifically conducted polls whilst extrapolating your partner's views to represent the whole of the UK!

Polls show the Remain lead is in the order of 54-46%. None of the 100+ polls conducted since 2017 has shown a majority in favour of leaving the EU.

We have changed our minds.


Oh dear, clinging to false hope. Some things never change.



LOL! Brexiteer head-in-sand par excellence.

But I'll bite Please provide one iota of evidence that there is now a majority in favour of leaving. Just one


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 27, 2019, 11:37 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 600
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
My partner voted Remain because she wanted to keep the Status Quo................Now she would vote Leave because the Status Quo has been shattered.

Many Remainers now feel that way[


Reality is quite different from your own narrow experience. It's amusing reading about your disdain for scientifically conducted polls whilst extrapolating your partner's views to represent the whole of the UK!

Polls show the Remain lead is in the order of 54-46%. None of the 100+ polls conducted since 2017 has shown a majority in favour of leaving the EU.

We have changed our minds.


Oh dear, clinging to false hope. Some things never change.



LOL! Brexiteer head-in-sand par excellence.

But I'll bite Please provide one iota of evidence that there is now a majority in favour of leaving. Just one


Iíll invite you to look at the last actual election results in June (European elections).


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 27, 2019, 11:54 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 592
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

And what do you think a non-binary election result tells us about a binary referendum?

But let's examine the result

Brexit Party 30.5%
Tories 8.8%
Ukip 3.2%

What point do you think you are making?


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 27, 2019, 12:42 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 549
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Even your trusty polls canít back up that:



Apparently the problem for opinion pollsters is that we've all become promiscuous.



That is in terms of which parties we vote for, Cool we're much more prepared to play the field than used to be the case.

https://www.theguardian.com/...redict-next-election

And I must admit that after voting for the same party in 11 successive General Elections, last time out I decided to vote for the best candidate instead and ended up voting for a party I'd never voted for before.

I didn't realise that the candidate was a convinced Fracker. Frown

Fortunately, she lost.

.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 27, 2019, 8:07 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 430
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
My partner voted Remain because she wanted to keep the Status Quo................Now she would vote Leave because the Status Quo has been shattered.

Many Remainers now feel that way[


Reality is quite different from your own narrow experience. It's amusing reading about your disdain for scientifically conducted polls whilst extrapolating your partner's views to represent the whole of the UK!

Polls show the Remain lead is in the order of 54-46%. None of the 100+ polls conducted since 2017 has shown a majority in favour of leaving the EU.

We have changed our minds.



Except I didn't extrapolate my partner's views to represent the whole nation.

You're lying to yourself by concluding that.

I stated her change of emphasis is now to Get Brexit Done because there is no going back to how it used to be...........That's a Remainer Unicorn.

I then stated that many remainers feel the same, based on vox pops from the news and social media............

I challenge you to tell me that not a single Remainer voter doesn't want us to honour the result and Leave because I am hearing it all the time.

We were Leave before, with Remainer suppport outside The Bubble the country is even more Leave than ever it was !!


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 27, 2019, 8:24 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 416
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
And what do you think a non-binary election result tells us about a binary referendum?

But let's examine the result

Brexit Party 30.5%
Tories 8.8%
Ukip 3.2%

What point do you think you are making?



That The Brexit Party trumped all others by a Country Mile and The Labour Party campaigned to hnour the result of the referendum by negoriating a withdrawal deal with the EU therefore it campaigned as a Leave Party.

Had this election been a GE then The Brexit Party would have had a massive majority and been the current Govt,

Polls mean Diddley Shit.

It's elections that count

People lie to pollsters

Election results are the reality.

Why do you need that explained to you?


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 27, 2019, 10:07 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 374
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
And what do you think a non-binary election result tells us about a binary referendum?

But let's examine the result

Brexit Party 30.5%
Tories 8.8%
Ukip 3.2%

What point do you think you are making?



That The Brexit Party trumped all others by a Country Mile and The Labour Party campaigned to hnour the result of the referendum by negoriating a withdrawal deal with the EU therefore it campaigned as a Leave Party.

Had this election been a GE then The Brexit Party would have had a massive majority and been the current Govt,

Polls mean Diddley Shit.

It's elections that count

People lie to pollsters

Election results are the reality.

Why do you need that explained to you?

What on earth are you on about?

The figures above are election results, not poll results.

For Brexit parties 42.5% - pretty close to the poll findings of around 46%, though perhaps they overestimate the size of what is left of support for Brexit.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 3:28 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 318
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
And what do you think a non-binary election result tells us about a binary referendum?

But let's examine the result

Brexit Party 30.5%
Tories 8.8%
Ukip 3.2%

What point do you think you are making?


Remain:
Liberal: 19.6%
Green: 11.8%
Change: 3.3%
SNP: 3.6%
PC: 1.0%

So a 42.5% v 39.3% result for parties explicitly supporting Brexit over explicitly supporting Remain.

I know it might be hard to remember Labours Brexit position in June, as itís flip-flopped so much, but here it is:
- we will seek to do a deal with the EU on our terms and if that is not possible, we seek a General Election.

The consequences of the Labour position changing to include a second referendum, will be laid bare at the next general election.


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 7:07 AM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 301
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Trying to interpret how those figures will relate to the outcome of the upcoming election is a nightmare for all concerned.

For instance the percentages don't necessarily stay the same across the country, so what impact the various parties stance will have in different areas isn't easy to predict. One obvious example is that the very small SNP, PC percentages actually translate into very significant percentages in Scotland and Wales.

There's also the issue of impact of electoral pacts, formal or otherwise. I don't see any likelihood of any such arrangement between Labour and Lib Dem, and currently it's uncertain whether Brexit and the Conservatives will hang together or separately.

A General Election is a clumsy way of settling a single issue crisis.

One difficulty is that large parts ofthe electorate may decide that other questions are more important to them than Brexit and vote according to the parties stance on those matters eg problems brought about by Austerity.

Johnson/Cummings/Baldrick may think that they can triumph by running a single issue campaign but they may not get the answer they expect.

We may end up with another hung Parliament and even deeper in doo doo.

.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 8:12 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 278
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
And what do you think a non-binary election result tells us about a binary referendum?

But let's examine the result

Brexit Party 30.5%
Tories 8.8%
Ukip 3.2%

What point do you think you are making?


Remain:
Liberal: 19.6%
Green: 11.8%
Change: 3.3%
SNP: 3.6%
PC: 1.0%

So a 42.5% v 39.3% result for parties explicitly supporting Brexit over explicitly supporting Remain.

I know it might be hard to remember Labours Brexit position in June, as itís flip-flopped so much, but here it is:
- we will seek to do a deal with the EU on our terms and if that is not possible, we seek a General Election.

The consequences of the Labour position changing to include a second referendum, will be laid bare at the next general election.


25% of Labour voters in the Euro elections voted to Leave in 2016. It is hard to imagine that as many woud vote Leave now since many leavers have jumped ship to the Tories or the other Brextremist parties. But even if we use the 25% figure the LAbour percentage would be split 10.2% Remain, 3.4%

That would push up the Leave figure to 45.9%(pretty much in line with the polls).

We no longer want Brexit. Of that there is no doubt.



007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 8:16 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 277
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

We may end up with another hung Parliament and even deeper in doo doo


I expect a large Tory majority at the next election. Which resolves the Brexit crisis.

However, if iím wrong, and weíre in hung parliament territory, then I would accept the only resolution is through a second referendum (although good luck getting parliament to agree on a question / questions).

A general election has to be the next step, as parliament no longer upholds the Brexit policy people voted for in 2017 (ie 84% of seats won on the basis of delivering Brexit without a second referendum).


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 8:19 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 276
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
And what do you think a non-binary election result tells us about a binary referendum?

But let's examine the result

Brexit Party 30.5%
Tories 8.8%
Ukip 3.2%

What point do you think you are making?


Remain:
Liberal: 19.6%
Green: 11.8%
Change: 3.3%
SNP: 3.6%
PC: 1.0%

So a 42.5% v 39.3% result for parties explicitly supporting Brexit over explicitly supporting Remain.

I know it might be hard to remember Labours Brexit position in June, as itís flip-flopped so much, but here it is:
- we will seek to do a deal with the EU on our terms and if that is not possible, we seek a General Election.

The consequences of the Labour position changing to include a second referendum, will be laid bare at the next general election.


25% of Labour voters in the Euro elections voted to Leave in 2016. It is hard to imagine that as many woud vote Leave now since many leavers have jumped ship to the Tories or the other Brextremist parties. But even if we use the 25% figure the LAbour percentage would be split 10.2% Remain, 3.4%

That would push up the Leave figure to 45.9%(pretty much in line with the polls).

We no longer want Brexit. Of that there is no doubt.


I must have missed the box on the ballot paper that said, Ďlabour voters, please tick whether you support brexití

Clutching at straws again.....

Iíll let you have the final word on this...


(This post was edited by 007Dale on Sep 28, 2019, 8:31 AM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 8:25 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 265
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

 

Oh dear. This is laughable. You were the one who was unable to come up with any evidence that we now support Brexit and resorted to the 2019 EU poll. A non-binary election which you tried to use to back up a binary referendum.

You are now rubbishing the only bit of evidence you have come up with. This is absolutely hilarious and illustrates the utter head-in-sand attitude of Brexiteeers.

Do you have any evidence that is credible??

LOL!


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 28, 2019, 8:27 AM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:01 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 228
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately




Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 9:06 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 219
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Oh dear. This is laughable. You were the one who was unable to come up with any evidence that we now support Brexit and resorted to the 2019 EU poll. A non-binary election which you tried to use to back up a binary referendum.

You are now rubbishing the only bit of evidence you have come up with. This is absolutely hilarious and illustrates the utter head-in-sand attitude of Brexiteeers.

Do you have any evidence that is credible??

LOL!



If there is any doubt that the country supports Leave a European election that was boycotted by millions of Leave voters and yet which Leave parties won the majority of the vote ( as per post #267) and in which The Brexit Party won the largest share of the vote by far in their first election provides absolute evidence that Remain has simply not gained any further traction.

Imagine if that had been another EU referendum and Leave campaigners actually mobilised their full support behind Leave.

I , for one, didn't vote in the European Election.

I also believe this week's shenanigan's in the courts and in Parliament has
hardened people's desire and determination to just ' Get Brexit Done'.
Labour's decision to use the ghost of Jo Cox to gain political ground and to deny the use of proper and decent language that dares cruiticise their actions and position was a mistake that backfired .
Since when has 'surrender' been an offensive word?

You, Paul C, need to get outside your Remainer Bubble and start listening to a wider audience.


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Sep 28, 2019, 9:07 AM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:08 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 211
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

If there is any doubt that the country supports Leave a European election that was boycotted by millions of Leave voters


Evidence?


In Reply To
in which The Brexit Party won the largest share of the vote by far in their first election provides absolute evidence that Remain has simply not gained any further traction.


How does a party called the BREXIT PARTY getting less thanka third of the vote prove Remain has not gained any further traction?

That is just nonsense.


In Reply To
I also believe this week's shenanigan's in the courts and in Parliament has
hardened people's desire and determination to just ' Get Brexit Done'.


Parliament will decide. We will not leave on 31 October, there will be a second referendum and enough of the electorate wil see sense and will vote to remain in the EU.

Repeating Theresa May/Boris Johnson/Daily Mail soundbites is meaningless.


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 28, 2019, 9:18 AM)


dottirofhod
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:11 AM

Posts: 13738
Location: The North. 'Ich hassen lehm kopfs'
Team(s): Crewe Alex and obviously England.(Unlike a lot on here)


Views: 206
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

We no longer want Brexit. Of that there is no doubt.



Will you stop speaking for me.

52% - 48%. Out.





July 1, 2019 to June 30,2020 = 87 / 75 / 12 / inc 3 x 0-0's. (You know my rules) @ 14 / 10 / 2019.
2019/20. Benelux = Bel = 0-0-0-(I(MUI-I)-0-0)-(0-2-1-1)/ Lux = 0-2 / Neth = 0-0-0-(1 - 2) Others France = 0-0 / Germany =0-0-0 / Italy =0-1(Act 2- Frosinone new)./ Iberia = P = 0-0 & S = 0-0.

Now blogging at https://eccentricity.video.blog/



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:14 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 204
     Re: [dottirofhod] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

 I think you will find the figures you quote are from three and a half years ago.

We have collectively changed our minds since then as all the evidence shows.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 9:16 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 199
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To


The only thing that Polls prove is that Remain voters are more likely to register with and engage with Pollsters than Leave voters.

Maybe because they have better access to the internet and more time on their hands.

Also it iis obvious that Remainers are bad losers and far more angry and therefore more likely to express their rage through engaging with pollsters.

To Extrapolate any poll to represent the whole electorate is dodgy science.

It is fundamentally wrong to say that Statistically Significant represents facts or scientificly definitive data.

You are a charlatan in presenting polls as the views of the nation.....

Game , Set and Match, Pal!


dottirofhod
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:21 AM

Posts: 13738
Location: The North. 'Ich hassen lehm kopfs'
Team(s): Crewe Alex and obviously England.(Unlike a lot on here)


Views: 190
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

STOP USING THE WE.

Sure all your blether was heard 4 years ago and look what happened then, because of people like you and your kind a result was obtained but never implemented.



July 1, 2019 to June 30,2020 = 87 / 75 / 12 / inc 3 x 0-0's. (You know my rules) @ 14 / 10 / 2019.
2019/20. Benelux = Bel = 0-0-0-(I(MUI-I)-0-0)-(0-2-1-1)/ Lux = 0-2 / Neth = 0-0-0-(1 - 2) Others France = 0-0 / Germany =0-0-0 / Italy =0-1(Act 2- Frosinone new)./ Iberia = P = 0-0 & S = 0-0.

Now blogging at https://eccentricity.video.blog/



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:26 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 599
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

The only thing that Polls prove is that Remain voters are more likely to register with and engage with Pollsters than Leave voters.


Evidence.

Yatesman - you really have to realise that simply stating something as fact does not make it so

If you wish to have your theories taken seriously, come up with some evidence.


Quote
To Extrapolate any poll to represent the whole electorate is dodgy science.

It is fundamentally wrong to say that Statistically Significant represents facts or scientificly definitive data.


And so on what do you base your belief that the majority still supports Leave? Is it scientifically more valid than opinion polling?

I suspect the greatest piece of evidence that support for Leave is disappearing like snaw aff a dyke is the utter fear those still supporting the cause have of a confirmatory referendum.

They know in their hearts the game is up.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:28 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 599
     Re: [dottirofhod] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
STOP USING THE WE.


"WE" is a perfectly accurate description of the UK electorate of which you and I are part.


dottirofhod
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:39 AM

Posts: 13738
Location: The North. 'Ich hassen lehm kopfs'
Team(s): Crewe Alex and obviously England.(Unlike a lot on here)


Views: 589
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
STOP USING THE WE.


"WE" is a perfectly accurate description of the UK electorate of which you and I are part.



Well WE voted 52%-48% three and a half years ago didn't WE ? Why are WE here now.



July 1, 2019 to June 30,2020 = 87 / 75 / 12 / inc 3 x 0-0's. (You know my rules) @ 14 / 10 / 2019.
2019/20. Benelux = Bel = 0-0-0-(I(MUI-I)-0-0)-(0-2-1-1)/ Lux = 0-2 / Neth = 0-0-0-(1 - 2) Others France = 0-0 / Germany =0-0-0 / Italy =0-1(Act 2- Frosinone new)./ Iberia = P = 0-0 & S = 0-0.

Now blogging at https://eccentricity.video.blog/



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:41 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 585
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

 

In Reply To
Game , Set and Match, Pal!


Internet rules and laws: the top 10, from Godwin to Poe

6. Danthís Law (also known as Parkerís Law)
States: ďIf you have to insist that you've won an internet argument, you've probably lost badly.Ē

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/...m-Godwin-to-Poe.html


leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 28, 2019, 9:43 AM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 574
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The only thing that is clear and certain from the multitude of (contradictory) posts telling me what is clear and certain is that nothing is clear and certain.

Brexit is not a binary decsion, there are still three options, Hard (No Deal) Brexit, Brexit with a deal and Remain - this is why it has stalled, there is not enough support in Parliament for any one of the three to get passed. Our current prime minister has voted for different options at different times. Jacob Rees-Mogg has said in parliament that a second referendum on the terms of a deal was an option.

The exact reasons why each voter voted in a specific way is never known, the number of voters from each side that have changed positions is unknown. All the polls show the country is split over the issue. We might now be able to get 52-48 in favour of remain, (after which we should have a penalty shoot out)



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:44 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 573
     Re: [dottirofhod] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Well WE voted 52%-48% three and a half years ago didn't WE ? Why are WE here now.


Yes we did.

And in the intervening period we have changed our mind. Why should we, in 2019, punish ourselves by imposing on ourselves something we no longer want?

It makes no sense at all.

...unless you can explain the sense of making ourselves do something we no longer want to do.


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 28, 2019, 9:45 AM)


dottirofhod
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 9:49 AM

Posts: 13738
Location: The North. 'Ich hassen lehm kopfs'
Team(s): Crewe Alex and obviously England.(Unlike a lot on here)


Views: 562
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

WE should have implemented the outcome but poor losers like YOU have been complaining ever since. YOU and your ilk are nauseating ( On this topic).



July 1, 2019 to June 30,2020 = 87 / 75 / 12 / inc 3 x 0-0's. (You know my rules) @ 14 / 10 / 2019.
2019/20. Benelux = Bel = 0-0-0-(I(MUI-I)-0-0)-(0-2-1-1)/ Lux = 0-2 / Neth = 0-0-0-(1 - 2) Others France = 0-0 / Germany =0-0-0 / Italy =0-1(Act 2- Frosinone new)./ Iberia = P = 0-0 & S = 0-0.

Now blogging at https://eccentricity.video.blog/



(This post was edited by dottirofhod on Sep 28, 2019, 10:09 AM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 10:10 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 555
     Re: [dottirofhod] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
WE should have implemented the outcome but poor losers like YOU have been complaining ever since. YOU and your ilk are nauseating.


Well we haven't implemented the outcome and in the intervening time we have changed our minds. Why should we punish ourselves by doing what we no longer want to do?


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 28, 2019, 11:49 AM)


dottirofhod
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 10:19 AM

Posts: 13738
Location: The North. 'Ich hassen lehm kopfs'
Team(s): Crewe Alex and obviously England.(Unlike a lot on here)


Views: 554
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
WE should have implemented the outcome but poor losers like YOU have been complaining ever since. YOU and your ilk are nauseating.


Well we haven't implemented the outcome and in the intervening time we have changed our minds. Why should be punish ourselves by doing what we no longer want to do?


In YOUR opinion.
Shove your polls , they mean nothing, I suppose you enter as many polls as possible , I would not know where to go to fill one in and no one rings me to poll. Your phone red hot ?

When it comes to voting , that used to be different but now I'm unsure , if the minority can stop the majority will.



July 1, 2019 to June 30,2020 = 87 / 75 / 12 / inc 3 x 0-0's. (You know my rules) @ 14 / 10 / 2019.
2019/20. Benelux = Bel = 0-0-0-(I(MUI-I)-0-0)-(0-2-1-1)/ Lux = 0-2 / Neth = 0-0-0-(1 - 2) Others France = 0-0 / Germany =0-0-0 / Italy =0-1(Act 2- Frosinone new)./ Iberia = P = 0-0 & S = 0-0.

Now blogging at https://eccentricity.video.blog/



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 10:29 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 542
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Perhaps the problem is we ended up with the wrong Johnson.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/...uk-politics-49594793

Maybe we should have tried to persuade Joe or Labour's Alan to be PM.

.


Or Rachel.

I wonder if Johnson will survive long enough for the impending Vote of No Confidence or if the Black Maria will have picked him up before then.

We are now in the realm of possible criminal charges.

"Boris Johnson referred to police watchdog over friendship with businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri"



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 533
     Re: [dottirofhod] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Shove your polls , they mean nothing






dottirofhod
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 10:41 AM

Posts: 13738
Location: The North. 'Ich hassen lehm kopfs'
Team(s): Crewe Alex and obviously England.(Unlike a lot on here)


Views: 529
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Shove your polls , they mean nothing






YOU like MY post 272 then ?



July 1, 2019 to June 30,2020 = 87 / 75 / 12 / inc 3 x 0-0's. (You know my rules) @ 14 / 10 / 2019.
2019/20. Benelux = Bel = 0-0-0-(I(MUI-I)-0-0)-(0-2-1-1)/ Lux = 0-2 / Neth = 0-0-0-(1 - 2) Others France = 0-0 / Germany =0-0-0 / Italy =0-1(Act 2- Frosinone new)./ Iberia = P = 0-0 & S = 0-0.

Now blogging at https://eccentricity.video.blog/



Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 12:11 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 471
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

The only thing that Polls prove is that Remain voters are more likely to register with and engage with Pollsters than Leave voters.


Evidence.

Yatesman - you really have to realise that simply stating something as fact does not make it so

If you wish to have your theories taken seriously, come up with some evidence.


Quote
To Extrapolate any poll to represent the whole electorate is dodgy science.

It is fundamentally wrong to say that Statistically Significant represents facts or scientificly definitive data.


And so on what do you base your belief that the majority still supports Leave? Is it scientifically more valid than opinion polling?

I suspect the greatest piece of evidence that support for Leave is disappearing like snaw aff a dyke is the utter fear those still supporting the cause have of a confirmatory referendum.

They know in their hearts the game is up.



We have established that polls come under the category of 'Dodgy Science'

We agree that something that might be considered ' Statistically Significant' is no substitute for ' Definitive Data'

and therefore it's correct to conclude that your continued and obsessive use of polls does NOT equate to evidence.

The ONLY definitive data with regard to the country's position on membership of the EU was the result of the 2016 referendum.

You know the data relative to that event.

Therefore we have the data to conclude the nation supports Leave.

The onus is on YOU to prove , through definitive data, the opposite is true.

You have been unable thus far to do that.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 12:30 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 458
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

The ONLY definitive data with regard to the country's position on membership of the EU was the result of the 2016 referendum.

You know the data relative to that event.

Therefore we have the data to conclude the nation supports Leave.


Wrong.

That event was nearly three and half years ago. We know that in June 2016 the electorate supportED Leave. That does not tell us what we support now.

ALL the evidence now is that the electorate does not support Leave.

It also explains why the surviving Leavers are set against a confirmatory referendum once we know the deal (if any) on offer.

They know the game is up. Enough of the electorate now sees sense.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 12:37 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 455
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Leading Brexiteers now inciting people to riot. This is the state of the Leave campaign now.

There is a criminal offence of incitement to riot.

https://twitter.com/...571381216718849?s=20


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 3:23 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 396
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

The ONLY definitive data with regard to the country's position on membership of the EU was the result of the 2016 referendum.

You know the data relative to that event.

Therefore we have the data to conclude the nation supports Leave.


Wrong.

That event was nearly three and half years ago. We know that in June 2016 the electorate supportED Leave. That does not tell us what we support now.

ALL the evidence now is that the electorate does not support Leave.

It also explains why the surviving Leavers are set against a confirmatory referendum once we know the deal (if any) on offer.

They know the game is up. Enough of the electorate now sees sense.



You have NO evidence that the electorate does not support Leave , only Dodgy Science.

The reason why Leavers are against a confirmatory referendum is because they know it is in reality a disigenuous attemppt to stop Brexit.
Leavers want the 2016 referendum honoured before any form of 2nd referendum.....So NOW you know the real reason.

Your use of the word surviving is offensive and shows the cesspit within your cranium.

At least you accept that the only definitive data available shows the nation supports Leaving the EU.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 3:25 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 393
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Leading Brexiteers now inciting people to riot. This is the state of the Leave campaign now.

There is a criminal offence of incitement to riot.

https://twitter.com/...571381216718849?s=20


Yes we are fully aware that the Elite and the Upper middle classes 'protest'

and the Working Class 'riot'


Some attitudes never change!


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 28, 2019, 4:07 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 374
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Leading Brexiteers now inciting people to riot. This is the state of the Leave campaign now.

There is a criminal offence of incitement to riot.

https://twitter.com/...571381216718849?s=20


Like Ms Hopkins he's a professional controversialist. He'll love attracting attention from grown-ups.

.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 4:52 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 370
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Leading Brexiteers now inciting people to riot. This is the state of the Leave campaign now.

There is a criminal offence of incitement to riot.

https://twitter.com/...571381216718849?s=20


Yes we are fully aware that the Elite and the Upper middle classes 'protest'

and the Working Class 'riot'


Some attitudes never change!


This Brextremist was advocating "rioting". Yes you're right, Leavers protest ... peacefully.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 4:53 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 369
     Re: [jon b] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Like Ms Hopkins he's a professional controversialist. He'll love attracting attention from grown-ups.

.


I trust the grown ups include the Metropolitan Police.


kirby knitters
Qatar World Cup bid member!

Sep 28, 2019, 5:20 PM

Posts: 18127
Location: Kirby Muxloe
Team(s): Hinckley United FC.


Views: 351
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Nice to see you may have even taken a break from this madness of a thread to go and watch a game this afternoon. LOL! Laugh


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 28, 2019, 5:25 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 342
     Re: [kirby knitters] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Aye, the battery on my phone went flat.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 12:01 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 263
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately



"Number 10 declined to discuss what evidence they had against the MPs "

"sources said"

"this newspaper has also learned."


I believe there are people who actually believe what they read in the Daily Heil.

The Tory lie machine is working flat out. They must be worried.


Chris1963
Man City Transfer Target!

Sep 29, 2019, 12:42 AM

Posts: 6942
Location: North London
Team(s): Oxford United / Groundhopper


Views: 241
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Perhaps the problem is we ended up with the wrong Johnson.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/...uk-politics-49594793




I wonder if Johnson will survive long enough for the impending Vote of No Confidence or if the Black Maria will have picked him up before then.

We are now in the realm of possible criminal charges.

"Boris Johnson referred to police watchdog over friendship with businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri"


Perhaps he could emulate his hero Winston Churchill. who escaped from a POW prison in South Africa during the Boer War. As Johnson would probably be sent to an open prison, escaping from it shouldn't be too difficult!


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 9:40 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 203
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To


"Number 10 declined to discuss what evidence they had against the MPs "

"sources said"

"this newspaper has also learned."


I believe there are people who actually believe what they read in the Daily Heil.

The Tory lie machine is working flat out. They must be worried.



Remainers don't like scrutiny , do they? LOL!

Personally, I think it's essential that the opposition 's collusion with the EU and any other foreign malintents should be investigated and the full power of the judicial system set against them if evidence of wrong doing uncovered.

It was rather strange that Parliament made such a fuss about being prorogued , saying they wanted to be able to scrutinise the Gov't and then spent the day shreiking and bawling about their precious Surrender Bill being scrutinised in return...........Double Standards in Extremis, such as we have become accustomed from Remainers.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 9:40 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 813
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To


"Number 10 declined to discuss what evidence they had against the MPs "

"sources said"

"this newspaper has also learned."


I believe there are people who actually believe what they read in the Daily Heil.

The Tory lie machine is working flat out. They must be worried.



Remainers don't like scrutiny , do they? LOL!

Personally, I think it's essential that the opposition 's collusion with the EU and any other foreign malintents should be investigated and the full power of the judicial system set against them if evidence of wrong doing uncovered.

It was rather strange that Parliament made such a fuss about being prorogued , saying they wanted to be able to scrutinise the Gov't and then spent the day shreiking and bawling about their precious Surrender Bill being scrutinised in return...........Double Standards in Extremis, such as we have become accustomed from Remainers.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 9:43 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 811
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

I used to wonder what kind of person read the Daily Mail and actually believed what it told them to think

Now I know.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 10:56 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 753
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I used to wonder what kind of person read the Daily Mail and actually believed what it told them to think

Now I know.


As usual your comment makes no sense, unless you are referring to yourself.

I never introduced the Daily Mail in to this thread, You did

I don't read the Daily Mail...... My impression is that its for older , middle class folk who support a particular staid view of society . But you patently do........obviously just to rail against it!

My comment was in relation to the general crux of your post and the headline that I could see on the picture you provided.

As I say, we should scrutinise those Remain MP's who put the Surrender Bill together and see if they have colluded wiith a foreign power against the legitimate efforts of the British Gov't to negotiate a deal.

I've no doubt, as you support the rule of law, you agree these people should be investigated............Am I correct ?

Do you support the rule of law ?

Do you agree thse that have colluded with foreign powers should be investigated?


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 11:29 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 721
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

 

Is there any evidence beyond the Heil headline?

Who is making such an allegations?


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 12:38 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 692
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

Is there any evidence beyond the Heil headline?

Who is making such an allegations?


You tell me . You brought the subject up.

Btw , I asked you a number of pertinet questions in my previous post which you have chosen not to answer.

I can only conclude you are selective in which laws you obey and which laws Remainers need adhere to especially in pursuit of their political goals

Set up an inquiry now. If any Remainer Parliamentarians are shown to have colluded against the UK with a foreign power ( The EU) to their advantage against the UK's position then they should be investigated by the Met Police.

Guy Verhofstadts appearance at a LibDem conference is a starting point.

What meetings did he have, what instructions did he give?

Who are the EU funding to stop Brexit ?

There's talk of the actor who stands outside Westminster in a top hat with a megaphone is being paid £80 per day .......Who's funding him?

Who's funding Femi-Sorry on Twitter???

We have a right to know who's paying to undermine our democracy!


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Sep 29, 2019, 12:40 PM)


bakis
Reserve Team Regular

Sep 29, 2019, 1:12 PM

Posts: 605
Location: Worcestershire
Team(s): Kidderminster Harriers


Views: 668
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

We are for the time being members of the EU, so I fail to see why discussing issues with EU representatives is 'colluding with a foreign power'. It's perfectly reasonable to have such discussions to help constrain the damaging and increasingly ludicrous actions of the current UK government.
Throughout this sorry saga it seems to me that the EU has been and continues to be a far better advocate of the interests of UK people, along with all European citizens, than the British government.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 1:17 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 666
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

Is there any evidence beyond the Heil headline?

Who is making such an allegations?


You tell me . You brought the subject up.


Absolutely. To show the levels to which the Tory Brexit press can stoop as they fool the hard of thinking Brexiteers who read their rubbish.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 1:20 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 663
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

We have a right to know who's paying to undermine our democracy!


How is any of this, even if there were any substance to it, undermining our parliamentary democracy?

The only ones who have been shown not to abide by the law are the Brextremists - starting at the very top.


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 2:20 PM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 649
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

For those that like a good opinion poll, latest opinium for Observer;

Tories 36%
Labour 24%
Lib Dem 20%
Brexit 11%

This is 25th-27th September (post the shameful events on Wednesday).

This would translate into the following seats:
Tories: 371
Labour: 170
Lib Dem: 32

Tory majority of 92.

Personally I donít put any faith in polls, but we could all relax and be assured the Brexit uncertainty was behind us if those results came to pass.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 2:35 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 644
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
For those that like a good opinion poll, latest opinium for Observer;

Tories 36%
Labour 24%
Lib Dem 20%
Brexit 11%

This is 25th-27th September (post the shameful events on Wednesday).
/reply]

Tories down, Labour up from last week, then.




PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 3:20 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 631
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Tory Brexiteers on the loose in Manchester.

https://twitter.com/...081653018767360?s=20


007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 3:27 PM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 627
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Ha, Iíd Take a 92 seat majority, you can keep the other 18 seats if it makes you feel better!


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Sep 29, 2019, 3:58 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 589
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

https://twitter.com/carolecadwalla/status/1177907522054828032?s=19

Nigel Farage appears to be inciting murder with his taking the knife to them quote!

If another person is knifed by a brexiteer, Farage will have blood on his hands!



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !


jon b
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 5:26 PM

Posts: 2990
Location: Dronfield
Team(s): SUFC, SWFC etc


Views: 552
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

To be fair to Farage it was a clumsy choice of words rather than intentional rabble rousing. His meaning, as I understand it, was to reduce the number of civil servants, generally equated to taking an axe to government spending. I don't agree with the sentiment given that it is those civil servants that provide the welfare and social services that we'd expect of a modern progressive society, but I can see where he is coming from.

Johnson on the other hand, is deliberately raising the political temperature through emotive language. The game plan appears to be to polarise opinion so that the Conservatives hoover up sufficient of the Brexit vote to win against the Remain vote split as it is between Labour and Lib Dem.

Given that under first past the post a 35% vote can give a party a healthy working majority, the Johnson/Cummings tactic, though odious, could well be effective.

.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 5:34 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 543
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Tory Brexiteers on the loose in Manchester.

https://twitter.com/...081653018767360?s=20


I see the beardy one is a Tory councillor from Gedling.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 5:57 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 527
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Tory Brexiteers on the loose in Manchester.

https://twitter.com/...081653018767360?s=20


I see the beardy one is a Tory councillor from Gedling.


Not quite the running street battles we see in Hong Kong but enough to upset the Snowflakes.
What's your take on the Momentum banner on the bridge in Manchester with the dummies hanging below with nooses on their necks threatening to murder Convervative members.
How proud are you of that on a scale of 1-10 with 10 meaning you have a few skeins of heavy duty nylon cable on order.?


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Sep 29, 2019, 5:58 PM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 6:42 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 499
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
What's your take on the Momentum banner on the bridge in Manchester with the dummies hanging below with nooses on their necks threatening to murder Convervative members.


LOL!

Is there any evidence to associate this with Momentum?

Sounds like Tory dirty tricks to me.

We had probable LIbDem dirty tricks in Shetland at the recent Holyrood by-election - "SNP" sprayed on a war memorial.

Try not to be so gullible. Question everything.


(This post was edited by PaulC on Sep 29, 2019, 6:42 PM)


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 9:43 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 449
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
What's your take on the Momentum banner on the bridge in Manchester with the dummies hanging below with nooses on their necks threatening to murder Convervative members.


LOL!

Is there any evidence to associate this with Momentum?

Sounds like Tory dirty tricks to me.

We had probable LIbDem dirty tricks in Shetland at the recent Holyrood by-election - "SNP" sprayed on a war memorial.

Try not to be so gullible. Question everything.


Fuck me, You and your obsession with 'evidence' like we are in a court of law instead of on a chat forum...........how about the fact it was on their twitter page this morning with rather supportive prose attached..........until it was , of course, deleted!

https://twitter.com/politikCentral/status/1178292041949859840/photo/1


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Sep 29, 2019, 9:46 PM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 9:46 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 445
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

You and your obsession with 'evidence' like we are in a court of law instead of on a chat forum.


Evidence smevidence.

Let's just make unfounded assertions and pass them off as truth.

It's what Brexiteers do, after all.

How are those sunllit uplands looking these days?


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 29, 2019, 9:47 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 441
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

You and your obsession with 'evidence' like we are in a court of law instead of on a chat forum.


Evidence smevidence.

Let's just make unfounded assertions and pass them off as truth.

It's what Brexiteers do, after all.

How are those sunllit uplands looking these days?


I just edited the last post with this..

https://twitter.com/politikCentral/status/1178292041949859840/photo/1

This was in 2016

https://twitter.com/sergeantdixie/status/1178270667449520128/photo/1

Lefty violence and intimidation is nothing new,.


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Sep 29, 2019, 9:53 PM)


Sale Holmfield
First Team Regular

Sep 29, 2019, 11:10 PM

Posts: 1394
Location: Sale
Team(s): Altrincham, Conwy Borough


Views: 398
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
What's your take on the Momentum banner on the bridge in Manchester with the dummies hanging below with nooses on their necks threatening to murder Convervative members.


LOL!

Is there any evidence to associate this with Momentum?

Sounds like Tory dirty tricks to me.

We had probable LIbDem dirty tricks in Shetland at the recent Holyrood by-election - "SNP" sprayed on a war memorial.

Try not to be so gullible. Question everything.


Fuck me, You and your obsession with 'evidence' like we are in a court of law instead of on a chat forum...........how about the fact it was on their twitter page this morning with rather supportive prose attached..........until it was , of course, deleted!

https://twitter.com/politikCentral/status/1178292041949859840/photo/1


Funny you mention that. I thought the effigies were pretty offensive, as did Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor of Greater Manchester. They were removed.

However, in a pub in Manchester I overheard three working class men using foul language, much like yourself, and they thought it was fair enough as the Tories do the same, and they are not welcome in Manchester. Northern working class people, despite what the London elite media would tell you, are not necessarily right wing bigots.

I thought it was just as bad when a Tory was mocking the protesters in today's wet weather by saying the great unwashed would have a wash so the protest was cancelled (it wasn't). I trust you will condemn that too.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 29, 2019, 11:18 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 393
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Tory Brexiteers on the loose in Manchester.

https://twitter.com/...081653018767360?s=20


Turns out the Tory thief, as well as being a councillor, is a school governor too.

The party of law and order.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 30, 2019, 7:58 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 335
     Re: [Sale Holmfield] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
What's your take on the Momentum banner on the bridge in Manchester with the dummies hanging below with nooses on their necks threatening to murder Convervative members.


LOL!

Is there any evidence to associate this with Momentum?

Sounds like Tory dirty tricks to me.

We had probable LIbDem dirty tricks in Shetland at the recent Holyrood by-election - "SNP" sprayed on a war memorial.

Try not to be so gullible. Question everything.


Fuck me, You and your obsession with 'evidence' like we are in a court of law instead of on a chat forum...........how about the fact it was on their twitter page this morning with rather supportive prose attached..........until it was , of course, deleted!

https://twitter.com/politikCentral/status/1178292041949859840/photo/1


Funny you mention that. I thought the effigies were pretty offensive, as did Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor of Greater Manchester. They were removed.

However, in a pub in Manchester I overheard three working class men using foul language, much like yourself, and they thought it was fair enough as the Tories do the same, and they are not welcome in Manchester. Northern working class people, despite what the London elite media would tell you, are not necessarily right wing bigots.

I thought it was just as bad when a Tory was mocking the protesters in today's wet weather by saying the great unwashed would have a wash so the protest was cancelled (it wasn't). I trust you will condemn that too.


Yes it was offensive, although I notice Paul C doesn't condemn it.

I'm not convinced a joke about the weather is quite as offensive as a banner promulgation murder as political strategy.

Brexit isnt party political. Brexit is neither Left or Right wing.
It surprises me not that people swear when speaking colloquially.
It surprises me not that left leaning working class people support Brexit.

I dont much regard the London media bubble.


leohoenig
Administrator

Sep 30, 2019, 8:12 AM

Posts: 13551
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town


Views: 326
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Yatesman, you know the rules
You may argue with what any person says (and I note that you certainly do that)

You may not call out posters for what they do not say. No one is at your beck and call.



Fat AND Pompous.
The proof that you can have too much of a good thing
Now blogging at http://www.leohoenig.com



007Dale
First Team Star

Sep 30, 2019, 11:01 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 257
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

The country has Brexit fatigue and is desperate for resolution. Parliament simply doesnít reflect the will of the people.

Two major opinion polls have pointed to the shift towards a pro-Brexit stance in the country;

The first, as reported yesterday, is Opinium for the Observer has Tories + Brexit + UKIP (ie hard Brexit) at 48% vs no Brexit (SNP, LD, Green, PC) at 28%.

The labour Deal + 2nd Ref takes 24%.

The second poll, Survation for the Guardian asks the question directly about Brexit, of those giving a response (excluding donít knows):

51% leave on 31st Oct with or without a deal.

The country has Brexit fatigue, they want it resolved and they want to leave the EU. All election results point that way and now even the dodgy opinion polls support that view.

Like them or loath them, the Tories are the only ones that can deliver what the people want.


(This post was edited by 007Dale on Sep 30, 2019, 11:30 AM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 30, 2019, 12:46 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 1248
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
The country has Brexit fatigue and is desperate for resolution. Parliament simply doesnít reflect the will of the people.

Two major opinion polls have pointed to the shift towards a pro-Brexit stance in the country;

The first, as reported yesterday, is Opinium for the Observer has Tories + Brexit + UKIP (ie hard Brexit) at 48% vs no Brexit (SNP, LD, Green, PC) at 28%.

The labour Deal + 2nd Ref takes 24%.


So 52% oppose a no deal Brexit.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 30, 2019, 7:52 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 1118
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
The country has Brexit fatigue and is desperate for resolution. Parliament simply doesnít reflect the will of the people.

Two major opinion polls have pointed to the shift towards a pro-Brexit stance in the country;

The first, as reported yesterday, is Opinium for the Observer has Tories + Brexit + UKIP (ie hard Brexit) at 48% vs no Brexit (SNP, LD, Green, PC) at 28%.

The labour Deal + 2nd Ref takes 24%.


So 52% oppose a no deal Brexit.




Your reply is exactly why polls aren't used to set policy or as an alternative to elections!


Yatesman
First Team Star

Sep 30, 2019, 7:56 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 1116
     Re: [leohoenig] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Yatesman, you know the rules
You may argue with what any person says (and I note that you certainly do that)

You may not call out posters for what they do not say. No one is at your beck and call.


Good point!

I'm just sorry Paul C passed up the opportunity I so kindly presented, but I get your point absoutely.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Sep 30, 2019, 11:08 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 1032
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
The country has Brexit fatigue and is desperate for resolution. Parliament simply doesnít reflect the will of the people.

Two major opinion polls have pointed to the shift towards a pro-Brexit stance in the country;

The first, as reported yesterday, is Opinium for the Observer has Tories + Brexit + UKIP (ie hard Brexit) at 48% vs no Brexit (SNP, LD, Green, PC) at 28%.

The labour Deal + 2nd Ref takes 24%.


So 52% oppose a no deal Brexit.




Your reply is exactly why polls aren't used to set policy or as an alternative to elections!


Absolutely. The sooner we have a referendum on Johnsonís deal/no deal, the better.

I was just demolishing 007Daleís argument.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Oct 1, 2019, 7:45 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 953
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
The country has Brexit fatigue and is desperate for resolution. Parliament simply doesnít reflect the will of the people.

Two major opinion polls have pointed to the shift towards a pro-Brexit stance in the country;

The first, as reported yesterday, is Opinium for the Observer has Tories + Brexit + UKIP (ie hard Brexit) at 48% vs no Brexit (SNP, LD, Green, PC) at 28%.

The labour Deal + 2nd Ref takes 24%.


So 52% oppose a no deal Brexit.




Your reply is exactly why polls aren't used to set policy or as an alternative to elections!


Absolutely. The sooner we have a referendum on Johnsonís deal/no deal, the better.

I was just demolishing 007Daleís argument.


I disagree that you demolished his argument. All you did was confirm that you are unable to take an objective view.
You inferred a conclusion based on flimsy evidence and unreasonable assumptions. You simply can't say that those who prefer a Labour Deal are also against a NO Deal..........They might be ok with a No Deal if there isn't a Labour Deal available. There are also many SNP supporters who vote for Brexit so we can reasonably assume would be happy with a No Deal.


With regards to another referendum , If it's a straight choice between a Johnson deal or No deal I would agree.

If there is a Remain option it can gtf!


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Oct 1, 2019, 7:49 AM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Oct 1, 2019, 8:15 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 924
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

With regards to another referendum , If it's a straight choice between a Johnson deal or No deal I would agree.

If there is a Remain option it can gtf!


Brave New World.

"You sre not allowed to change your mind."


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Oct 1, 2019, 3:42 PM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 799
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/queen-sought-advice-sacking-prime-minister-638320

Wonder why the Tory And pro brexit media have gone quiet on this?



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !

(This post was edited by Towlawtom on Oct 1, 2019, 4:02 PM)


Yatesman
First Team Star

Oct 1, 2019, 6:09 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 739
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

With regards to another referendum , If it's a straight choice between a Johnson deal or No deal I would agree.

If there is a Remain option it can gtf!


Brave New World.

"You sre not allowed to change your mind."


Change your mind today, change it back tomorrow and do that every day for the rest of your life ............Just don't expect to an election every time you do, LOL!


Yatesman
First Team Star

Oct 1, 2019, 6:14 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 734
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/queen-sought-advice-sacking-prime-minister-638320

Wonder why the Tory And pro brexit media have gone quiet on this?


It's a non-story, that's why!


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Oct 1, 2019, 6:20 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 732
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Third multi-issue GE in 4 years coming up soon but the Brextremists won't allow us a second referendum now we know what the implications of Brexit are. No longer the sunlit uplands we were promised.

The Brextremists know the gameís up.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Oct 1, 2019, 6:57 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 718
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Latest Polls. The Remain lead is getting even bigger.

SURVATION SEP 25
Leave 45%
Remain 51%
Don't know 4%

YOUGOV SEP 20
Leave 37%
Remain 46%
Wouldn't vote/dk 17

KANTAR SEP 9
Leave 34%
Remain 37%
Wouldn't vote/dk 28%

DELTAPOLL SEP 4
Leave 40%
Remain 46%
Dk 14%

PANELBASE SEP 6
Leave 45%
Remain 52%
Dk 3%


(This post was edited by PaulC on Oct 1, 2019, 6:58 PM)


Yatesman
First Team Star

Oct 1, 2019, 6:58 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 717
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Third multi-issue GE in 4 years coming up soon but the Brextremists won't allow us a second referendum now we know what the implications of Brexit are. No longer the sunlit uplands we were promised.

The Brextremists know the gameís up.


Boris is on the case......He's the leader of the party that actually got elected to form a Gov't to lead the country .

I never heard anyone promise sunlit uplands in the referendum campaign.

Please direct me to footage of the politician who used the specific term ' Sunlit Uplands', please.

I would like to hear the context in which that promise was made.

Thank you, in anticipation!


Yatesman
First Team Star

Oct 1, 2019, 7:01 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 711
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Latest Polls. The Remain lead is getting even bigger.

SURVATION SEP 25
Leave 45%
Remain 51%
Don't know 4%

YOUGOV SEP 20
Leave 37%
Remain 46%
Wouldn't vote/dk 17

KANTAR SEP 9
Leave 34%
Remain 37%
Wouldn't vote/dk 28%

DELTAPOLL SEP 4
Leave 40%
Remain 46%
Dk 14%

PANELBASE SEP 6
Leave 45%
Remain 52%
Dk 3%


Dodgy Science.

Polls aren't elections

More Remainers sign up to polling companies than Leavers.

Statistical significance is no substitute for 'definitive data'.....

But you know all that!


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Oct 1, 2019, 7:11 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 703
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

[repl]

More Remainers sign up to polling companies than Leavers!


LOL!

Evidence?


Yatesman
First Team Star

Oct 1, 2019, 8:47 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 667
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
[repl]

More Remainers sign up to polling companies than Leavers!


LOL!

Evidence?


My statement stands unless you provide evidence to the contrary..


The truth is you quote polls with absolutely no knowledge or understanding of their efficacy

You produce no evidence of their methodology, no fine detail of their micro-data .

Internet polling does not have a proven track record and telephone polling can no longer reach enough people and is probably too expensive.

Taking your poll from a single source on the internet, as many pollsters are now wont to do, for efficiency, does not , even with weighting or other control measures, provide a diverse enough representative sample of the electorate.

But that's just common sense!


(This post was edited by Yatesman on Oct 1, 2019, 9:10 PM)


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Oct 1, 2019, 8:49 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 664
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
[repl]

More Remainers sign up to polling companies than Leavers!


LOL!

Evidence?


My statement stands unless you provide evidence to the contrary..


LOL!!!!!


Yatesman
First Team Star

Oct 1, 2019, 9:09 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 640
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
[repl]

More Remainers sign up to polling companies than Leavers!


LOL!

Evidence?


My statement stands unless you provide evidence to the contrary..


LOL!!!!!


I've edited my last post...........you need to read it.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Oct 1, 2019, 10:22 PM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 594
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
[repl]

More Remainers sign up to polling companies than Leavers!


LOL!

Evidence?


My statement stands unless you provide evidence to the contrary..


LOL!!!!!


I've edited my last post...........you need to read it.


Well you certainly give us a good laugh, yatesman if nothing else.

You see the method of proof is to make a statement and back it up with evidence. I can see how the Brext elite who stand to make billions out of our potential misfortune, are able to get away with their outrageous lies. So many Brexiteers just hear what they want to hear.

Facts and experts are anathema to them.


Yatesman
First Team Star

Oct 2, 2019, 8:07 AM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 503
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To

In Reply To
[repl]

More Remainers sign up to polling companies than Leavers!


LOL!

Evidence?


My statement stands unless you provide evidence to the contrary..


LOL!!!!!


I've edited my last post...........you need to read it.


Well you certainly give us a good laugh, yatesman if nothing else.

You see the method of proof is to make a statement and back it up with evidence. I can see how the Brext elite who stand to make billions out of our potential misfortune, are able to get away with their outrageous lies. So many Brexiteers just hear what they want to hear.

Facts and experts are anathema to them.





You've just made 2 statements that are impossible to back up with evidence,,,,,,,,,,

'Brexiteers are set to make millions'
'Brexiteers hear what they want to hear'

You can have a theory about future events but you can't make a definitive statement like tht without ignoring the very standards you attempt to set for others.

Where is your evidence/
Are you saying Remainers can't or are barred from making millions from Brexi?

Are Remainers not already wealthy?

Gina Miller?
Jeremy Corbyn?
Gary Lineker?
JK Rowling?
Steve Coogan?
David Beckham?


The truth is that 'asking for evidence' is a tactic used to stifle debate. Not because evidence doesn't have a place it's just that eviddence can take forms other than finding some dodgy scientific research on the internet, as you are wont to do!

Did the great thinkers and philosophers of antiquity rely of Evidentialism or did reason, experience and rationality play the greater part ?

Evidence is one thing but even then the conclusions drawn can be false.......something you are most certainly guilty of.

If evidence can provide two people to draw two conclusions that suggests either the evidence is faulty, incomplete or that other factors play a part in people's beliefs..........Common sense, Reason and Intelligence, Environment .

My point is Evidentialis is one, flawed area of justifying beliefs and there are many other factors that you are too ready to dismiss.

There is plenty of stuff on the internet talking about Evidentialism and Philosophy if yo.u care to look

For once in your life try taking off your blinkers and actually sit and contemplate these issues because we are not in a court of law and you are not winning any battles offering flawed evidence and disregarding other pertinent factors that people are entitled to use to justify their beliefs.

It's why Remain have failed to convert Leavers to their POV despite what is probably the most sustained, angry, bitter and well funded propoganda campaign in history.


dottirofhod
Man City Transfer Target!


Oct 2, 2019, 8:47 AM

Posts: 13738
Location: The North. 'Ich hassen lehm kopfs'
Team(s): Crewe Alex and obviously England.(Unlike a lot on here)


Views: 481
     Re: [Yatesman] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

First official case , more to follow off here of Brexit-triggered psychosis.
Get well soon.

''Dr Muhammad Zia Ul Haq Katshu, who treated the patient, wrote: ďHis wife reported that since the EU referendum results were declared on 24 June 2016, he started spending more time putting his thoughts across on social media''

https://www.independent.co.uk/...usions-a9127841.html



July 1, 2019 to June 30,2020 = 87 / 75 / 12 / inc 3 x 0-0's. (You know my rules) @ 14 / 10 / 2019.
2019/20. Benelux = Bel = 0-0-0-(I(MUI-I)-0-0)-(0-2-1-1)/ Lux = 0-2 / Neth = 0-0-0-(1 - 2) Others France = 0-0 / Germany =0-0-0 / Italy =0-1(Act 2- Frosinone new)./ Iberia = P = 0-0 & S = 0-0.

Now blogging at https://eccentricity.video.blog/



PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Oct 2, 2019, 9:32 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 447
     Re: [dottirofhod] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Classic from James Cleverley (surely, nominative determinism gone wrong) on the Today programme:

"We must respect the DUP as they are the elected representatives of the people. "


007Dale
First Team Star

Oct 3, 2019, 7:58 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 296
     Re: [dottirofhod] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately

Well the offer from Boris to the EU is out there.

The noise coming from DUP and Labour rebels is they may support it.

However, this is contingent on the EU agreeing, which I would suspect is unlikely to happen. That said, itís better for RoI than a no-deal, so you never know.


PaulC
Man City Transfer Target!


Oct 3, 2019, 8:34 AM

Posts: 11693
Location: Ayrshire, Midlothian
Team(s): AFC Darwen, Troon, Ayr Utd, Burnley


Views: 279
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Well the offer from Boris to the EU is out there.

The noise coming from DUP and Labour rebels is they may support it.

However, this is contingent on the EU agreeing, which I would suspect is unlikely to happen. That said, itís better for RoI than a no-deal, so you never know.


How will we leave without a deal, if it's illegal?


007Dale
First Team Star

Oct 3, 2019, 9:39 AM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 246
     Re: [PaulC] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Well the offer from Boris to the EU is out there.

The noise coming from DUP and Labour rebels is they may support it.

However, this is contingent on the EU agreeing, which I would suspect is unlikely to happen. That said, itís better for RoI than a no-deal, so you never know.


How will we leave without a deal, if it's illegal?


I think youíve been reading too much remainer propaganda. No deal is not illegal, it fact leaving the EU without a deal (if necessary) is actually still law, as per the EU withdrawal act.

If you are referring to the Benn / Surrender Act, it absolutely does not make leaving with no-deal illegal. At worst it only delays it until 31st January. But, all it does in reality is require the Government to seek an extension - which may or may not be granted by the EU.


Towlawtom
Reserve Team Regular


Oct 3, 2019, 11:52 AM

Posts: 667
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 213
     Re: [007Dale] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Well the offer from Boris to the EU is out there.

The noise coming from DUP and Labour rebels is they may support it.

However, this is contingent on the EU agreeing, which I would suspect is unlikely to happen. That said, itís better for RoI than a no-deal, so you never know.


Varadkar has more care for the safety of the northern Ireland people in his little finger then Johnson has in his whole blundering blubbery body.
He has no sense of responsibility for his own citizens

He doesn't care about anyone other than himself and his hedge fund buddies..

Varadkar is honouring the GFA an international peace treaty unlike our derisory PM.

Brexiteers might finally see what being a member of the EU finally means 27 countries standing shoulder to shoulder to protect one of their own. Instead of the sheer stupidity and mind numbing self centered Fu*kwittery of the elite Eton crowd.



I need to have the last word, as it always looks as if I am right !

(This post was edited by Towlawtom on Oct 3, 2019, 12:09 PM)


007Dale
First Team Star

Oct 3, 2019, 12:26 PM

Posts: 1726
Location:
Team(s): St Albans City, Leicester City


Views: 941
     Re: [Towlawtom] Brexit - Again or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Well the offer from Boris to the EU is out there.

The noise coming from DUP and Labour rebels is they may support it.

However, this is contingent on the EU agreeing, which I would suspect is unlikely to happen. That said, itís better for RoI than a no-deal, so you never know.


Varadkar has more care for the safety of the northern Ireland people in his little finger then Johnson has in his whole blundering blubbery body.
He has no sense of responsibility for his own citizens

He doesn't care about anyone other than himself and his hedge fund buddies..

Varadkar is honouring the GFA an international peace treaty unlike our derisory PM.

Brexiteers might finally see what being a member of the EU finally means 27 countries standing shoulder to shoulder to protect one of their own. Instead of the sheer stupidity and mind numbing self centered Fu*kwittery of the elite Eton crowd.


So, youíre on the fence about Johnson then? :)


Yatesman
First Team Star

Oct 3, 2019, 5:30 PM

Posts: 1455
Location: A Wee Toon in the Scottish Borders
Team(s):


Views: 840