Non League Matters - The Continuation of Tonys english Football Site 


  Main Index MAIN
INDEX
Search Posts SEARCH
POSTS
Who's Online WHO'S
ONLINE
Log in LOG
IN

Home: All Other Football Interests: All other football:
Wages/revenue ratio

 



rainjar
First Team Star

Jun 16, 2010, 7:37 AM

Posts: 1427
Location:
Team(s):

Post #1 of 5 (994 views)
Shortcut
Wages/revenue ratio Can't Post or Reply Privately

It looks bad in the Premier League, but Serie A is far worse.



A breakdown of revenue also makes interesting reading, as does profitability:





The charts and graphs are from here.



Football Insights


leohoenig
Administrator

Jun 16, 2010, 12:13 PM

Posts: 7668
Location: Outer Cheltenhamshire
Team(s): Cheltenham Town

Post #2 of 5 (967 views)
Shortcut
Re: [rainjar] Wages/revenue ratio [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

This does not make the Premier look bad - despite paying by far and away the highest wages, they still are barely over 60% of turnover, and the Premier League clubs overall, make a healthy profit.



Fat AND Pompous.
I was going to list all my grounds for the season, but the moderator said five lines only.
Now blogging at www.leohoenig.com


rainjar
First Team Star

Jun 16, 2010, 1:20 PM

Posts: 1427
Location:
Team(s):

Post #3 of 5 (959 views)
Shortcut
Re: [leohoenig] Wages/revenue ratio [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

""For every £100 that comes into Premier League football clubs, £67 goes out on the wage bill - that's too high," said Deloitte's Dan Jones."

I think something closer to 60% is seen as the most that is sustainable.

Apart from wages, clubs have other costs. Operating profit of 93 million Euro out of turnover of 2,360 million Euro, with wages taking off 1,559 million Euro, is pretty miserable. The margins are very narrow - a 5% drop in turnover or rise in costs (including wages) could swing the Premier League into the red.



Football Insights


rainjar
First Team Star

Jun 22, 2010, 3:35 AM

Posts: 1427
Location:
Team(s):

Post #4 of 5 (888 views)
Shortcut
Re: [leohoenig] Wages/revenue ratio [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

Your post on another thread:
The Norwich City chairman says you need to average around 35,000 or above to break even as a Premier League club - only around half the division reaches this (9/20). And yet, according to figures you have relayed, the Premiership has overall profitability.

I do not doubt any of this. Clubs such as Liverpool and Manchester United were turning in good profits, before leveraged takeovers started eating into them, while many clubs at the lower end of the table are losing money, and have no hope of turning this around.

However, it does not have to be this way - there is one obvious cost that can be brought down until the club breaks even, players' wages. If one club acted on this, then it would effect their competitiveness. If half the division or more did so together, then it would bring down players' wages. It will not even cause an exodus of foreign mercenaries, as the Premier League could still be offering competitive salaries with all the other major leagues.
I'm replying here as the tables/charts above provide a useful context.

I suppose no one is suggesting a maximum wage in this day and age. A salary cap as the total amount a club can spend on player wages as a percentage of total revenue might be feasible. Somewhere around 60% is what the accountants seem to think is sustainable.

Apart from the difficulties and added costs of monitoring clubs' accounts, it means clubs can only grow organically, and stymies the working of a free market.

A modified guarantee system might work better. If a club spends more than 60% of its revenue on player wages, then the owners/directors of the club should be required to provide guarantees for a substantial part of the excess amount.

Financial penalties for breaches, such as fines as a percentage of the amount in excess might help deter cooking of books.

I also think that increasing the pyramid not only reduces the risk of the smaller clubs in the Premier League over-extending themselves, it also creates a more level playing field within each level of the pyramid.

It doesn't address previously incurred debt (including from leveraged takeovers) and any costs of ground development, which can be substantial.



Football Insights


(This post was edited by rainjar on Jun 22, 2010, 8:20 AM)


rainjar
First Team Star

May 31, 2012, 2:40 AM

Posts: 1427
Location:
Team(s):

Post #5 of 5 (562 views)
Shortcut
Re: [rainjar] Wages/revenue ratio [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

Premier League club wages climb to new highs

Quote

The proportion of income that Premier League clubs spend on wages hit a new high in the 2010-11 season, says a Deloitte report into football finance.

Clubs in England's top football league paid some 70% of their income on salaries for the first time.

Manchester United, who won the league that year, spent 46% of revenue on pay, but Manchester City spent 114%.

The Deloitte report says that control of wages "continues to be football's greatest commercial challenge".

Its 21st Annual Review of Football Finance also says that pay discipline is needed "in order to deliver robust and sustainable businesses".

Total wages across the Premier League rose by £201m (14%), equivalent to more than 80% of the £241m increase in club revenues that season, to give a final salary bill of £1.6bn.

Chelsea once again had the highest wage bill, at £191m.

The overall wages increase was driven by the clubs that finished in the top six positions in 2010-11, as well as Aston Villa. Between them they accounted for £145m of the total increase in pay.

However, clubs in the top league did manage to reduced average net debt by £351m, or 13%, to £2.4bn by the summer of 2011.

This was the lowest level since 2006, and largely due to significant debt reductions by Manchester United and Liverpool.

....




Football Insights

 
 


The Soccerlinks Hit List

free hit counters

Search for (options) HOSTED BY SOCCERLINKS v.1.2.3