Home: Non Football Related: Other Sports:
Ashes 2013-14: Ex-ECB chairman calls for county cricket overhaul



cope1
Man City Transfer Target!

Jan 15, 2014, 7:03 PM

Posts: 7267
Location:
Team(s):


Views: 975
Ashes 2013-14: Ex-ECB chairman calls for county cricket overhaul or Reply Privately

http://www.bbc.co.uk/...t/0/cricket/25702462

The proposal is to have 12 teams instead of 18. Naturally the counties won't go for it because they're only interested in their own, respective positions. However, a good point that is made that if you started now, from scratch, you wouldn't have 18 teams.

As we aren't starting from scratch I don't know how a 12-team setup could be achieved (short of having a 12-6 divisional split which would just be a bit weird) but we have more than twice as many teams at the top level as any other country except India (which has a population of over 1bn).


wishmaster3211
First Team Star


Jan 15, 2014, 7:59 PM

Posts: 2481
Location: A small town in Monmouthshire
Team(s): Calne Town, Darlington, Rosenborg, Sussex CCC, Huddersfield RL


Views: 967
Re: [cope1] Ashes 2013-14: Ex-ECB chairman calls for county cricket overhaul or Reply Privately

Oh no not again!!

This sort of thing gets dredged up all the time. The only bit thats slightly true is that you wouldn't start by having 18 now, but immediately he makes a fool of himself by recommending amalgamating Kent and Sussex simply because "they are next to each other". This takes no account of how successful a county Sussex are financially and performance wise.

He says "nobody watches County Cricket" which only proves that he doesn't. Two years ago Worcester got 3,500 for the first day of the season. Somerset for another also get regular 3,000 crowds. In fact Worcs get bigger crowds for some 4 day games than they do for the Limited Overs stuff.

There was a much more balanced report published two years ago that showed crowd numbers and membership numbers for all 18, plus their financial state, that would be the starting point if you wanted to do this. But it doesn't support this sort of agenda;

Basket cases were: Leicestershire, Glamorgan, Northants (yet they won the T20 and got promoted last year!!), not far behind are Lancashire, Yorkshire, Warwickshire and Kent.

There's the problem, some of the Test Counties are in big financial trouble, as are Durham in fact, despite winning the Title this year. The trouble is just like the "franchise" argument the facts won't fit neatly into what the likes of McLaurin want to do. Predominantly the most successful Counties are those where Cricket is still the main attraction in the County town, the big City Clubs get terrible crowds except for the odd T20 game and have mortgaged themselves to get test cricket running up huge debts in the process.

Aside from the difficulty of making it work, I am unconvinced that it would make much of a difference to Player Development. The Championship is the hardest first Class competition in the World by some distance. the problem is the England structure is run by people that don't think it is, players are taken out of the County game too much, miss out on Development and get messed around with by coaches who have their own agenda. Witness the debacle of Steven Finn, make no mistake, the England set up is what has ruined him NOT County Cricket. The very fact that we have such a spread of First Class cricket is a great aid to developing players to the highest possible level. There are Australian players who drop out of tests straight into Grade cricket for example...

Anyway, If you want to play the game of 18 into 12, I would have a stab at: Durham, Yorkshire, Lancashire, Somerset & Glos, Sussex, Surrey & Kent, Essex, Leics and Northants combined, Worcester & Warwicks (never happen!!), Notts & Derbys (again never going to happen), Middlesex, Hampshire and get rid of Glamorgan completely.



"Run For the Hills Before They Burn"

Checkout my Facebook page "Proper Football Grounds"

facebook.com/paul.fergusson