Non League Matters - The Continuation of Tonys english Football Site 


  Main Index MAIN
INDEX
Search Posts SEARCH
POSTS
Who's Online WHO'S
ONLINE
Log in LOG
IN

Home: Non-League Football: Restructuring:
1-2-4-8-16

 

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All


ianh
Reserve Team Star

Feb 2, 2012, 1:05 PM

Posts: 912
Location:
Team(s):

Post #1 of 97 (5896 views)
Shortcut
1-2-4-8-16 Can't Post or Reply Privately

After last weeks meeting at Leicester there was almost unilateral arguments against 12 step 5 divisions, ranging from time and money to growth and retention with a reference to the green footprint thrown in for good measure.

It has been discussed so many times before on this board before, but when the Gresley representative stood up and took over the floor to show how it would work and combat Bishop Stortford and Witham Town-esque problems, it was amazing how many people agreed.

for the good of football This was demonstrated to be the way we should be working towards in the future, it couldnt happen overnight, but I beleive in 10 or maybe less years we could have the holy grail.

All the changes that need to be made have happened in the past and have precedents,
you would need 1 x step 3 (Midland?),
2 x step 4 (Midland East & West) and
2 step 5 leagues (elevate 2 current step 6 leagues?)

It can be done, but many issues would, so am asking through the board what issues? and possible solutions?


wazzafan
Youth Team Star


Feb 2, 2012, 1:36 PM

Posts: 299
Location: The City of Thelwall
Team(s): Warrington Town

Post #2 of 97 (5878 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ianh] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

I think there would be numerous stages in order to make this work, amazing how common maths can bring such a positive response. Firstly, the biggest losers out of this would be the step 5 divisions, who would lose a huge number of teams in the reorganisation. Therefore my first stage would be to increase the number of current step 5 leagues to 18, then after a few seasons I would include a midland division at step 3, making the pyramid look 1-2-4-6-18 (with a northern one and midland one). The next stage would be the most difficult in my eyes, essentially promoting two divisions from step 5 to step 4, due to the number of teams (44) that would be needed.



"2007/08 saw Warrington Town make big plans for the future with ambitions to be in the Football League within 5 years."

Five years later, and were still in the Evo-Stik North.

Non League Pyramid 2013/14: http://tinyurl.com/bzjowkf


London Harrier
First Team Star


Feb 2, 2012, 2:32 PM

Posts: 1781
Location: North London
Team(s): Kidderminster Harriers, Wingate & Finchley

Post #3 of 97 (5859 views)
Shortcut
Re: [wazzafan] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I think there would be numerous stages in order to make this work, amazing how common maths can bring such a positive response. Firstly, the biggest losers out of this would be the step 5 divisions, who would lose a huge number of teams in the reorganisation. Therefore my first stage would be to increase the number of current step 5 leagues to 18, then after a few seasons I would include a midland division at step 3, making the pyramid look 1-2-4-6-18 (with a northern one and midland one). The next stage would be the most difficult in my eyes, essentially promoting two divisions from step 5 to step 4, due to the number of teams (44) that would be needed.


Never mind pussy footing around with it.

Just introduce a complete overhaul of the NLS for the 2013/14 season and give clubs ‘x’ amount of years to meet ground requirements (or failing that, change the ground requirements). Mike Avery has (or had) a working example on his website.

That said, I would go even further and have a 2-4-8-16-32 split, with much smaller divsions (every division at the revised Step 2 down to have a maximum of 18 clubs, cutting down on loss making mid week games) A single division at level 5 still doesn’t make a lot of sense, especially when compared with the European models.

I would also introduce an appication for promotion system for ALL steps, similar to the current step 5 to step 4 scenario. The biggest problem with the current model is that clubs (and fans) assume they must take promotion. It is (or should be) purely optional.





Vote for your favourite football grounds at 100 British Grounds To Visit Before You Die



wazzafan
Youth Team Star


Feb 2, 2012, 3:15 PM

Posts: 299
Location: The City of Thelwall
Team(s): Warrington Town

Post #4 of 97 (5836 views)
Shortcut
Re: [London Harrier] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

You mean these?

http://www.mikeavery.co.uk/NewAlliancePremierLeague.htm

http://www.mikeavery.co.uk/MidlandPremRegionalConf.htm



"2007/08 saw Warrington Town make big plans for the future with ambitions to be in the Football League within 5 years."

Five years later, and were still in the Evo-Stik North.

Non League Pyramid 2013/14: http://tinyurl.com/bzjowkf


London Harrier
First Team Star


Feb 2, 2012, 3:18 PM

Posts: 1781
Location: North London
Team(s): Kidderminster Harriers, Wingate & Finchley

Post #5 of 97 (5833 views)
Shortcut
Re: [wazzafan] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To
You mean these?

http://www.mikeavery.co.uk/NewAlliancePremierLeague.htm

http://www.mikeavery.co.uk/...PremRegionalConf.htm


That's the ones Smile



Vote for your favourite football grounds at 100 British Grounds To Visit Before You Die



London Harrier
First Team Star


Feb 2, 2012, 3:31 PM

Posts: 1781
Location: North London
Team(s): Kidderminster Harriers, Wingate & Finchley

Post #6 of 97 (5820 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ianh] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To
After last weeks meeting at Leicester there was almost unilateral arguments against 12 step 5 divisions, ranging from time and money to growth and retention with a reference to the green footprint thrown in for good measure.

It has been discussed so many times before on this board before, but when the Gresley representative stood up and took over the floor to show how it would work and combat Bishop Stortford and Witham Town-esque problems, it was amazing how many people agreed.

for the good of football This was demonstrated to be the way we should be working towards in the future, it couldnt happen overnight, but I beleive in 10 or maybe less years we could have the holy grail.

All the changes that need to be made have happened in the past and have precedents,
you would need 1 x step 3 (Midland?),
2 x step 4 (Midland East & West) and
2 step 5 leagues (elevate 2 current step 6 leagues?)

It can be done, but many issues would, so am asking through the board what issues? and possible solutions?


If the vast majority (say 75-80%) of NLS member clubs requested a 1-2-4-8-16 or 2-4-8-16-32 pyramid, on what grounds would the FA so 'no'?

In all honesty, I am starting to get bored of national restructuring threads; it's the same ideas/arguments over and over again, with the same 'but the FA don't want to know' conclusions. Is there anything proactive that can be done, otherwise I foresee another ten years of hot air?

Also - and let's be honest - no matter WHAT system is in place, someone will find something to complain about.Wink



Vote for your favourite football grounds at 100 British Grounds To Visit Before You Die



oftenscore6
Chelsea Transfer Target

Feb 2, 2012, 3:54 PM

Posts: 3320
Location: Huddersfield
Team(s): FCUM, MUFC, Altrincham, Hammarby, Hawthorn (AFL),Huddersfield Rams (UK AFL)

Post #7 of 97 (5809 views)
Shortcut
Re: [wazzafan] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I think there would be numerous stages in order to make this work, amazing how common maths can bring such a positive response. Firstly, the biggest losers out of this would be the step 5 divisions, who would lose a huge number of teams in the reorganisation. Therefore my first stage would be to increase the number of current step 5 leagues to 18, then after a few seasons I would include a midland division at step 3, making the pyramid look 1-2-4-6-18 (with a northern one and midland one). The next stage would be the most difficult in my eyes, essentially promoting two divisions from step 5 to step 4, due to the number of teams (44) that would be needed.


I don't get the need for mathematical symmetry (either 1-2-3-6-12 or 1-2-4-8-16). You can achieve the same desires of clean promotion and appropriate league allocations by fixing regional boundaries and ringfencing promotion / relegation within that.

I note we are unlikely to get 12 step 5 promotees this season, as usual, with the likelihood of more Midlands teams leaving the Southern League and expanding the NPL boundaries south again this summer.



-----------------------------------------------
Last new football ground (438) Beck Lane Bay Athletic 2-1 Ovenden West Riding (13/5)
With FC United: 83 - and looking forward to one in Moston in 2014-5 (touchwood)!
On the agenda:
Osters v AIK (19/5)
Hammarby v Landskrona (20/5)


rainworthgord
First Team Star

Feb 2, 2012, 3:56 PM

Posts: 1614
Location:
Team(s):

Post #8 of 97 (5807 views)
Shortcut
Re: [London Harrier] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
You mean these?

http://www.mikeavery.co.uk/NewAlliancePremierLeague.htm

http://www.mikeavery.co.uk/...PremRegionalConf.htm


That's the ones Smile


The FA won't want to know because no matter how sensible, they are SOMEONE ELSE'S IDEAS and not theirs. By the same token they completely blanked Tony's ideas.


yorkieexile
First Team Star

Feb 2, 2012, 4:39 PM

Posts: 1746
Location: Hinckley
Team(s): Halifax, Groundhopper

Post #9 of 97 (5785 views)
Shortcut
Re: [rainworthgord] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

I think the difficulty with fixed boundaries is that wherever they are drawn, some clubs will undoubtedly have been better off had they been drawn in some other way.

I can imagine, for example, that one of the boundaries would go through either London or Birmingham, or any other big city, and then we will get the perennial beef that, say, why cannot all the London teams be in the same league.


ianh
Reserve Team Star

Feb 2, 2012, 4:53 PM

Posts: 912
Location:
Team(s):

Post #10 of 97 (5779 views)
Shortcut
Re: [oftenscore6] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I don't get the need for mathematical symmetry (either 1-2-3-6-12 or 1-2-4-8-16). You can achieve the same desires of clean promotion and appropriate league allocations by fixing regional boundaries and ringfencing promotion / relegation within that.

I note we are unlikely to get 12 step 5 promotees this season, as usual, with the likelihood of more Midlands teams leaving the Southern League and expanding the NPL boundaries south again this summer.


You have answered your own question there really, if you had a proper pyramid (1.2.4.8.16) , there would be less (if any) likelihood of more Midlands teams leaving the southern league and expanding the NPL Boundaries south.

The reason for the question is because the FA - Leagues Committee have been working hard on a restructuring (cant call it proposal or submission) exercise, where they have in their own words started with a blank piece of paperand allotted 12 leagues from 14 (with the only caveat being that you cant use the dartford Crossing).

When they presented it with the average extra travelling for step 5 clubs of nearly 500 miles a year (up to 3000 for some) and the increased expenditure of on average 30% (up to 80% for some) some clubs understandably baulked, so the FA - Leagues committee not in so many words said ........if you can come up with anything better...


Fanatic
First Team Regular


Feb 2, 2012, 7:05 PM

Posts: 1241
Location: Deepest Suffolk
Team(s):

Post #11 of 97 (5728 views)
Shortcut
Re: [oftenscore6] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To
I don't get the need for mathematical symmetry (either 1-2-3-6-12 or 1-2-4-8-16). You can achieve the same desires of clean promotion and appropriate league allocations by fixing regional boundaries and ringfencing promotion / relegation within that.


A very good point. Whilst I do support a symmetrical pyramid, I would also welcome one with fixed regional boundaries. It can be done, as I believe it is in Germany with state leagues having varying numbers of promotion places depending on their populations.


cope1
Chelsea Transfer Target


Feb 2, 2012, 7:30 PM

Posts: 5377
Location:
Team(s):

Post #12 of 97 (5712 views)
Shortcut
Re: [London Harrier] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

The simply answer to your first question there is that clubs aren't represented in any real way. They are represented at league meetings but the leagues don't have any reason to ask the question about what the clubs want full stop, they only ask about what the clubs want from the league itself (hopefully!). This means that the question never gets asked.

As for the same old discussions, as Andrelux once said to me, it's a merry go round. You get on and enjoy it for a couple of goes round, then you start going round for the third time and want to get off and go and do something else. Unless you're a geek like most of us on here, in which case you just keep on going round... :)



If you're looking for a new website for your club, league or any other organisation give me a shout at www.acwebcreations.net.


chienmort
Reserve Team Regular


Feb 3, 2012, 8:50 AM

Posts: 663
Location: Poole
Team(s): Poole Town FC, Queens Park RANGERS.

Post #13 of 97 (5582 views)
Shortcut
Re: [London Harrier] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
I think there would be numerous stages in order to make this work, amazing how common maths can bring such a positive response. Firstly, the biggest losers out of this would be the step 5 divisions, who would lose a huge number of teams in the reorganisation. Therefore my first stage would be to increase the number of current step 5 leagues to 18, then after a few seasons I would include a midland division at step 3, making the pyramid look 1-2-4-6-18 (with a northern one and midland one). The next stage would be the most difficult in my eyes, essentially promoting two divisions from step 5 to step 4, due to the number of teams (44) that would be needed.


Never mind pussy footing around with it.

Just introduce a complete overhaul of the NLS for the 2013/14 season and give clubs ‘x’ amount of years to meet ground requirements (or failing that, change the ground requirements). Mike Avery has (or had) a working example on his website.

That said, I would go even further and have a 2-4-8-16-32 split, with much smaller divsions (every division at the revised Step 2 down to have a maximum of 18 clubs, cutting down on loss making mid week games) A single division at level 5 still doesn’t make a lot of sense, especially when compared with the European models.

I would also introduce an appication for promotion system for ALL steps, similar to the current step 5 to step 4 scenario. The biggest problem with the current model is that clubs (and fans) assume they must take promotion. It is (or should be) purely optional.


i agree with all but two of your points Mike.

Firstly with so many people (myself included) working on Saturday, Midweek games are the only ones I see.

Secondly. Have grading amnesty by all means but lowering the standards has a knock on effect all the way up the league. The steps in ground grading make it less arduous the improve the ground at each promotion. If you relax any of them permanently, it will be come an invisible wall to the next promotion.



Poole Town FC - les couilles du chien


aicwhu
Reserve Team Sub

Feb 3, 2012, 10:39 AM

Posts: 504
Location: pershore
Team(s): west ham

Post #14 of 97 (5550 views)
Shortcut
Re: [chienmort] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

why does relaxing the gradings create an invisible wall?

if they are relaxed all the way up the non-league pyramid then the step change for promotion whilst slightly larger than now would still be manageable for clubs seeking promotion


andrew c


Railwatcher
Ballboy/girl

Feb 4, 2012, 8:57 AM

Posts: 9
Location:
Team(s):

Post #15 of 97 (5395 views)
Shortcut
Re: [aicwhu] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

Well forgive me I am new here, but..............

The only reason 1:2:4:8:16 keeps raising its head is the 3 who should be 4; the Step 3 chairman who have too much influence and won't let go of control to make the 4. They are a main part of the brains behing the tinkering, the ones who need the promotion pool which doesn't work, the ones with no geographical boundaries.

Oh and facilities, aren't we all supposed to have F grades for a few years now?

There are those with excellent f grades and those who scrape through, but we should all have them for Step 5 with the prize of FA cup entry.Wink

In Reply To


chienmort
Reserve Team Regular


Feb 4, 2012, 9:00 PM

Posts: 663
Location: Poole
Team(s): Poole Town FC, Queens Park RANGERS.

Post #16 of 97 (5277 views)
Shortcut
Re: [aicwhu] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To
why does relaxing the gradings create an invisible wall?

if they are relaxed all the way up the non-league pyramid then the step change for promotion whilst slightly larger than now would still be manageable for clubs seeking promotion


andrew c

The reason is that Grade A is the standard for entry in to the Football league and also the standard for the Conference Prem. Football League stadia have to abide by certain conditions laid out in the Green Guide, a government guide to the safety at sports grounds. It is not really possible to relax at this level and so each step up the grading ladder has to be drawn up with Grade A in mind.

If the difference between any two grade is too large, it would cost too much for a promoted team and so many would refuse promotion. Thus the invisible ceiling.

I am sorry if this seems a little abstract.



Poole Town FC - les couilles du chien


Mister TwoU
First Team Sub


Feb 4, 2012, 11:29 PM

Posts: 1157
Location: Bo'ness
Team(s): Cowdenbeath

Post #17 of 97 (5244 views)
Shortcut
Re: [chienmort] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or

Surely a simple codicil appended to the grading framework would sort that out extremely efficiently?

All it would need to cover is a subruling that any promoted team would be entitled to a certain extra period of grace within which to get their house in order; subject perhaps to there being evidenced certain progress throughout that period. Failure to improve by certain stages of that period would simply result in demotion and naturally, no further promotion allowable unless required works are completed on time.

Operating with such an appendix could easily allow for a much broader pyramid to develop. It's not rocket surgery.



Ut temporibus est cum diabolus accipit renes

Still the original Paddy MacNab.


buncranaboy
Man City Transfer Target!


Feb 5, 2012, 12:14 AM

Posts: 11608
Location: South Birmingham
Team(s): Barnstoneworth United; Bostock Stanley

Post #18 of 97 (5229 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Mister TwoU] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To
Operating with such an appendix could easily allow for a much broader pyramid to develop. It's not rocket surgery.



Are you a doctor ?


chienmort
Reserve Team Regular


Feb 5, 2012, 12:20 AM

Posts: 663
Location: Poole
Team(s): Poole Town FC, Queens Park RANGERS.

Post #19 of 97 (5227 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Mister TwoU] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

At most steps you have until March 31st to improve your ground AFTER you have been promoted. There is at least one exception:

Step 5 to Step 4. Step 5 needs and F grade but you have to get and E by 31st march in the season you are applying for promotion. If promoted you then need a Grade D by 31st March in your first season at step 4.



Poole Town FC - les couilles du chien


UKPunk
Man City Transfer Target!


Feb 5, 2012, 12:30 AM

Posts: 9215
Location: Clacton On Sea, Essex
Team(s): Tottenham Hotspur

Post #20 of 97 (5221 views)
Shortcut
Re: [buncranaboy] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
Operating with such an appendix could easily allow for a much broader pyramid to develop. It's not rocket surgery.

Are you a doctor ?

Yes, he's a rocket surgeon. Cool



Matches: 602 (58)
Grounds: 278 (50)

Last Matches: Saturday 11th May
Kent County League Premier Division
Stansfield, Oxford & Bermondsey 1 Snodland 2
(At Snodland)








aicwhu
Reserve Team Sub

Feb 5, 2012, 10:44 AM

Posts: 504
Location: pershore
Team(s): west ham

Post #21 of 97 (5160 views)
Shortcut
Re: [chienmort] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

you are right of course

the football league set their own benchmark which would be unchanged
but relaxing from conference down would not change the fact that to get into the league you need a certain grading so as i see it no-one is worse off as that particular grading standard was always there.
but lower down the pyramid life gets easier
and then more regionalisation could occur ie 1-2-4-8-16

andrew c


Mister TwoU
First Team Sub


Feb 5, 2012, 5:08 PM

Posts: 1157
Location: Bo'ness
Team(s): Cowdenbeath

Post #22 of 97 (5076 views)
Shortcut
Re: [aicwhu] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or

Perhaps it'd be a good idea to maintain or slightly increase expected standards at Conf. N&S level, but allow for some relaxation directly beneath that?

Doing that would then help ensure the seriousness of those applying for Conference standard football, while also allowing sensibly run teams without League ambitions to 'peak' at SLP/NPLP/ILP level.

That way, the introduction of an MPL corridor between steps 2 & 5 would be legitimised, with promotional possibility for two teams from each of the now four area-sections, replacing the two bottom-fours in the Conference regional divisions.
Standard Champion + P/Off winners go up, subject to that stiffer grading requirement, and say a one-season allowance for teams to be promoted without that grade, subject to their achievement of the previous grading standard.

Teams finishing in the top-5 without even that lesser grading to be ignored for promotion/play-off purposes, with possibility of P/Off positions then being offered to 6th. & 7th. places, but no further down than that.
Play-offs would 'run team(s) short if more than two top-5 finishers fail suitable gradings, or maybe an allowance might be made to take a 6th./7th.-place team best placed with PPG from other arms of the pyramid as replacements?



Ut temporibus est cum diabolus accipit renes

Still the original Paddy MacNab.


Andy Mac
Reserve Team Regular


Feb 5, 2012, 7:14 PM

Posts: 564
Location: Dawlish Warren
Team(s):

Post #23 of 97 (5040 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Mister TwoU] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately

What a truly remarkable spell-checker you have. Very impressive...


Mister TwoU
First Team Sub


Feb 5, 2012, 11:44 PM

Posts: 1157
Location: Bo'ness
Team(s): Cowdenbeath

Post #24 of 97 (4972 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Andy Mac] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or

Just the standard on-site one Andy. It tends to 'Yankee' spellings, so got to watch out for errant 'zees'



Ut temporibus est cum diabolus accipit renes

Still the original Paddy MacNab.


oftenscore6
Chelsea Transfer Target

Feb 7, 2012, 12:19 AM

Posts: 3320
Location: Huddersfield
Team(s): FCUM, MUFC, Altrincham, Hammarby, Hawthorn (AFL),Huddersfield Rams (UK AFL)

Post #25 of 97 (4815 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ianh] 1-2-4-8-16 [In reply to] Can't Post or Reply Privately


In Reply To

In Reply To
I don't get the need for mathematical symmetry (either 1-2-3-6-12 or 1-2-4-8-16). You can achieve the same desires of clean promotion and appropriate league allocations by fixing regional boundaries and ringfencing promotion / relegation within that.

I note we are unlikely to get 12 step 5 promotees this season, as usual, with the likelihood of more Midlands teams leaving the Southern League and expanding the NPL boundaries south again this summer.


You have answered your own question there really, if you had a proper pyramid (1.2.4.8.16) , there would be less (if any) likelihood of more Midlands teams leaving the southern league and expanding the NPL Boundaries south.


I think you missed my point Ian, you can do the same without changing the number of divisions.



-----------------------------------------------
Last new football ground (438) Beck Lane Bay Athletic 2-1 Ovenden West Riding (13/5)
With FC United: 83 - and looking forward to one in Moston in 2014-5 (touchwood)!
On the agenda:
Osters v AIK (19/5)
Hammarby v Landskrona (20/5)

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All
 
 


The Soccerlinks Hit List

free hit counters

Search for (options) HOSTED BY SOCCERLINKS v.1.2.3